West Ujimqin Banner, Xilingol League, Inner Mongolia, China sales7@bouling-chem.com
Follow us:

1,3,2-Dioxathiolane 2,2-Dioxide

    • Product Name 1,3,2-Dioxathiolane 2,2-Dioxide
    • Alias Ethylene sulfite
    • Einecs 214-281-4
    • Mininmum Order 1 g
    • Factory Site West Ujimqin Banner, Xilingol League, Inner Mongolia, China
    • Price Inquiry sales7@bouling-chem.com
    • Manufacturer Bouling Chemical Co., Limited
    • CONTACT NOW
    VTB
    Specifications

    HS Code

    583491

    Cas Number 1009-43-4
    Molecular Formula C2H4O4S
    Molecular Weight 124.12 g/mol
    Iupac Name 1,3,2-Dioxathiolane 2,2-dioxide
    Appearance Colorless liquid
    Boiling Point 176-177 °C
    Melting Point -15 °C
    Density 1.457 g/cm³
    Solubility In Water Miscible
    Smiles C1CO[S](=O)(=O)O1
    Inchi InChI=1S/C2H4O4S/c3-1-2-6(4,5)7-2/h2-3H2
    Synonyms Ethylene sulfite
    Odor Characteristic, faint odor
    Refractive Index 1.4366

    As an accredited 1,3,2-Dioxathiolane 2,2-Dioxide factory, we enforce strict quality protocols—every batch undergoes rigorous testing to ensure consistent efficacy and safety standards.

    Packing & Storage
    Packing 1,3,2-Dioxathiolane 2,2-dioxide comes in a 25g amber glass bottle, tightly sealed, with Sigma-Aldrich labeling and hazard warnings.
    Shipping 1,3,2-Dioxathiolane 2,2-Dioxide (Sigma Aldrich/Merck/TCI Chemical Grade) is shipped in tightly sealed containers, protected from moisture and light. Packaging complies with chemical safety regulations, ensuring secure transport. Shipping typically requires labeling as a hazardous material, with material safety data sheets (MSDS) included for proper handling upon receipt.
    Storage 1,3,2-Dioxathiolane 2,2-Dioxide should be stored in a tightly sealed container in a cool, dry, and well-ventilated area, away from heat, moisture, and incompatible substances such as strong bases and reducing agents. Avoid light exposure and sources of ignition. Ensure appropriate chemical safety signage and access restrictions, following relevant Sigma-Aldrich, Merck, or TCI Material Safety Data Sheet (MSDS) recommendations.
    Free Quote

    Competitive 1,3,2-Dioxathiolane 2,2-Dioxide prices that fit your budget—flexible terms and customized quotes for every order.

    For samples, pricing, or more information, please call us at +8615371019725 or mail to sales7@bouling-chem.com.

    We will respond to you as soon as possible.

    Tel: +8615371019725

    Email: sales7@bouling-chem.com

    Get Free Quote of Bouling Chemical Co., Limited

    Flexible payment, competitive price, premium service - Inquire now!

    Certification & Compliance
    More Introduction

    1,3,2-Dioxathiolane 2,2-Dioxide: A Closer Look From the Manufacturer’s Bench

    Understanding What 1,3,2-Dioxathiolane 2,2-Dioxide Brings to Industry

    Over many years in chemical manufacturing, certain materials stand out for the impact they have on both process and product. 1,3,2-Dioxathiolane 2,2-dioxide, often recognized by chemists as a cyclic sulfone, developed its own reputation through both reliability and versatility. In our facility, this compound—sometimes known under its alternate name, ethylene sulfite—fills a niche unmatched by more traditional reagents or additives. For people who haven’t watched it transform their own process lines, the potential might appear technical or esoteric on paper. But at production scale, the difference shows up in real yields and cleaner downstream handling.

    This molecule comes with a five-membered ring that incorporates both sulfur and oxygen. That structural detail sounds academic until you watch its influence on reactivity and stability. The crystalline or liquid state (as determined by purification and requested specification) allows for tight analytical controls and consistent results across batches. Our standard lot offers purity above 99%, monitored through gas chromatography and confirmed by wet chemical methods. These aren’t just proud numbers for brochures—clients detect that level of precision in the reproducibility of their own output.

    What Makes 1,3,2-Dioxathiolane 2,2-Dioxide Distinct?

    Anytime we scale up a product, the questions roll in: How does this differ from other sulfones, carbonates, or similar reagents? Why set aside the tried-and-true dimethyl sulfone, or pass over ethylene carbonate? The answer, based on time spent at the reactor and in pilot lines, unfolds in three key areas: reactivity, by-products, and safety profile. Unlike open-chain compounds, the ring structure of 1,3,2-dioxathiolane 2,2-dioxide offers pronounced chemical selectivity, steering many syntheses along cleaner, more controlled routes.

    For manufacturers focused on sulfonation steps, this material changes the story. You get high efficiency without excessive waste. Minimal release of free SO2 supports safer working conditions—our gas sensors confirm a remarkable drop in localized emissions compared to benchtop runs with alternatives. Customers in battery electrolytes, pharmaceutical intermediates, and advanced plastics comment on how much easier purification runs, how the end product fits specification with fewer downstream headaches.

    How We Produce It, and Why That Matters

    In many chemical stories, process design shapes the eventual reputation of a substance more than any data sheet claim. Our 1,3,2-dioxathiolane 2,2-dioxide follows a batch reaction under nitrogen, with meticulous quantitative dosing. Most of our technicians have refined this protocol through several generations, adjusting solvent choices and temperature profiles to beat the yield ceiling while avoiding problematic side formation. What arrives in our storage tanks after purification meets strict moisture and acid number limits, vital for customers pushing critical applications.

    Unlike some commodity chemicals, each drum traces back to both raw material lots and real-time process parameters. By maintaining this link between process and product, we catch any deviation before it reaches the customer. Multiple analytical checkpoints—hydrolytic stability, residual solvent testing, and pH stability—back each shipment. This approach reflects both regulatory pressures and the very practical fact that consistency, batch-to-batch, means less reworking and fewer product complaints.

    User Experience and Proven Results

    Unlike many alternatives, 1,3,2-dioxathiolane 2,2-dioxide doesn’t surprise formulators with erratic shelf life or drift in melting point. Several of our clients maintain six-month stocks, noting zero detectable degradation under recommended storage. Some users, particularly in complex synthesis routes, combine our product with lithium salts or specific catalysts, relying on its unique balance of ring strain and oxidative stability. These aren’t qualities found in larger or linear sulfones, which tend to break down or overreact under the same conditions.

    We’ve watched how switching to this material improves both throughput and product recovery. For alkylation reactions, for example, chemists comment on sharper end-point detection by titration and a marked drop in undesirable side reactions. In plasticizers and specialty resins, use rates decrease without sacrificing performance—another nod to higher reactivity and tighter selectivity. Some battery material producers even reduced their solvent residues, cutting both waste treatment costs and off-gassing in final device assembly.

    Safety and Environmental Responsibility

    Through the years, regulatory focus on process safety and environmental stewardship placed extra attention on sulfur-based reagents. We have adapted by improving our containment and reaction hygiene, and 1,3,2-dioxathiolane 2,2-dioxide makes this task less daunting than with traditional sulfonating agents or open-chain alternatives. Measured emissions during reactor unloading read consistently lower thanks to this product’s lower vapor pressure and tighter containment of sulfur-oxygen volatile fragments. Operators also report fewer headaches, skin irritation, or acute symptoms compared to legacy compounds.

    Disposal and waste treatment often dictate total cost for the user, not just purchase price. Hydrolyzable, yet resistant to aggressive breakdown, this compound helps users process rinse waters more efficiently, minimizing persistent sulfur content in effluent. We partner with several major waste handlers to design protocols for neutralization, reducing both liability and environmental impact. The feedback loop from our customers directs ongoing updates to our internal and external procedures.

    Differences Highlighted in Real-World Workflows

    For years, solvent selection in advanced electrolytes or precision plastics revolved around cost and established practice rather than chemical performance. Users turned to PEG derivatives, high-boiling carbonates, or sulfolane due to historical precedent. But as demand rose for tighter controls—especially in lithium ion battery manufacturing or medical device coatings—the edge from switching to a cyclic sulfone became too significant to ignore.

    Our own testing, corroborated by independent labs, shows that 1,3,2-dioxathiolane 2,2-dioxide blends more seamlessly with polar solvents and metal ions while resisting oxidative breakdown. In contrast, even carefully purified linear sulfones leach color or drop viscosity after a few cycles, threatening sensitive electronics or high-purity filaments. Common carbonate solvents break down into corrosive impurities far faster under heat stress.

    Switching over isn’t always simple, especially for large-scale operations. Rigorous compatibility trials and small-batch validation carry their own risks and costs. We learned this first-hand by assisting a major medical polymer producer over several quarters. Their final assessment, after extensive side-by-side running, concluded they could eliminate one downstream neutralization step and cut in-process testing time by several hours per batch. Other manufacturers, especially those with batch-to-batch comparison data, regularly mention decreased off-line troubleshooting as a tangible difference after full adoption.

    Regular Insights from the Factory Floor

    It’s easy to underestimate packaging and handling challenges in theory, but day-to-day operations reinforce the importance of physical state and container choice. Early on, customers told us that inconsistencies in solids loading or gradual solvent seepage delayed their own line start-ups. We rebuilt packaging solutions to offer product as both stabilized liquid (in lined drums) and as free-flowing flakes by special order. Forklift drivers and warehouse teams now encounter fewer incidents, and our quality control data shows no migration of plasticizers or liner material. This attention to end user reality results from lessons learned—not from lab manuals or regulatory documents, but from real-world complications.

    Clients often conduct their own quantitative analysis upon receipt, and we accommodate third-party verification. Chromatograms and moisture readings differ little across batches, and any flagged shipment is traced, tested, and, if needed, replaced on the next delivery. Our reputation in this field reflects a culture of listening, not just selling.

    Support Through Technical Engagement

    Our lab teams work alongside customers through process changes and new project launches. We give formulation advice, but also engage on troubleshooting and tailored solution-finding, knowing the limits as well as the strengths of 1,3,2-dioxathiolane 2,2-dioxide. Our own pilot facilities have run head-to-head comparisons with traditional sulfone and carbonate solvents, both in esterification and selective oxidation projects. Users bring their requirements, and we compare product loss rates, stability, and cleanup times under shared conditions. The numbers repeatedly tip in favor of this product for processes needing speed, chemical selectivity, and fewer by-products.

    Battery manufacturers, for instance, request detailed impurity profiles for electrolyte candidates. We offer both in-house data and coordination with third-party labs. Some of these projects have led us to refine our purification loop, reducing trace acids and residual organics even further. Feedback from these collaborations has shaped not only the product, but also our wider safety and logistics support.

    Sourcing and Scalability

    In chemical manufacturing, upstream continuity matters. We contract with long-standing suppliers and maintain buffer stock in anticipation of seasonal demand surges. Our in-house purification gives us flexibility, so we can fine-tune product parameters for different user groups—battery electrolyte, fine chemicals, or engineered plastics. No matter where the end-market lies, our output remains consistent profile: tight specification, robust packaging, and after-sales technical engagement as needed.

    Whether a partner handles multi-ton bulk reactors or carefully dispenses grams for speciality synthesis, our experience points to the fact that smooth transition takes shared problem-solving and a willingness to adjust standard processes. Several clients began with pilot drums and now receive regular tankers once internal validation clears. For research innovators, smaller pack sizes offer the same specification and guarantee of purity.

    Challenges in Adoption and Ongoing Problem-Solving

    No new material enters a value chain without resistance. Issues include solvent compatibility, variation in OEM guidance, and operator skepticism. Success stories tend to come from those groups willing to rigorously trial the product under their unique conditions—sometimes pushing beyond what our own lab suggested. Feedback cycles often reveal new applications. In one case, an electronics firm reported lower corrosion potential in sensitive components, prompting us to commission additional compatibility studies and confirm their findings independently.

    We assemble multi-disciplinary support teams—application chemists, logistics planners, health and safety officers—to solve transition challenges. Regulatory compliance always features in these discussions. Both domestic and global standards guide our methods, and we keep documentation ready for audit. The result shapes quicker product integration for new clients. Lab results published by users confirm that performance gains often exceed what was initially hoped—higher yields, less downtime, less material loss.

    Looking to the Future: R&D and Sustainability

    Shifts in end-market demand often steer R&D, and this holds no less true here. With growing global interest in battery technologies and advanced polymer composites, the need for reproducible, low-residue, and energy-efficient reagents rises. Our teams invest in improvements to both process efficiency and overall environmental impact. Recent upgrades further reduced production effluent, cut energy input for key synthesis stages, and improved operator safety through better containment and monitoring. Continuous dialogue with downstream users contributes to these developments. As industry regulations tighten, especially around persistent pollutants and worker exposure, we remain committed to reducing both risk and environmental load—with measurable results reflected in annual sustainability audits.

    Greener variants and recycled input streams are currently under feasibility review. Early pilot results suggest promising routes for circular economy integration, particularly with spent battery materials and advanced plastic recycling. Our plant trials report lower energy inputs and fewer process modifications than expected. This is an evolving domain, and we welcome ongoing discussion with forward-thinking users who want a role in shaping tomorrow’s chemical processes.

    Customer-Driven Evolution

    Direct user feedback—formulated through practical experience, not wish lists—proves invaluable. Several partnerships with technical universities allow us to support joint research and fine-tune the product to emerging applications. From microelectronics to energy storage, demands evolve rapidly, and material properties that provided an edge just two years ago sometimes require a new approach. Each modification we consider moves through cycles of pilot testing, scaled-up validation, and industry review.

    For process managers and R&D directors balancing time, budget, and regulatory hurdles, a material’s real contribution shines through its predictable behavior, high reactivity, and proven safety performance. The experience gained through collaboration points to 1,3,2-dioxathiolane 2,2-dioxide as a catalyst not just for reactions but for industry change—toward safer, more efficient, and more responsible manufacturing.

    Conclusion of Practical Experience

    Every detail in our handling and production of 1,3,2-dioxathiolane 2,2-dioxide reflects dialogues with end users, operational data, and evolving regulations. Its combination of chemical specificity, process safety, and reduced environmental footprint set it apart from the field of cyclic and linear sulfones. As new markets challenge us to refine and adapt further, our commitment to transparent communication, thorough technical support, and ongoing reinvestment holds steady. This approach, honed on the factory floor and tested through demanding industrial partnerships, continues to guide the evolution of both our product and our service.