© 2026 Nanjing Finechem Holdings Co., Ltd,
All Right Reserved
Over the decades, chemical companies shaped the history of Sodium 1-pentanesulfonate monohydrate through consistent refinements in sulfonation and purification. Decades back, surfactants and ion-pairing agents pulled in worldwide attention, sparking a wave of innovation in analytical chemistry. This specialty salt emerged during a growing need for selective retention and separation in complex sample matrices. I remember reading about U.S. and Japanese research groups in the 1970s, who worked through trial and error, learning that just tweaking the alkyl chain length or ionic configuration could swing the outcome of high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) separations. As the public and private sectors chased tighter standards for pharmaceuticals and environmental controls, manufacturers turned to sodium 1-pentanesulfonate for its balance of solubility, chain length, and mild ionic nature, which allowed for repeatable results. The chemical didn’t just sneak into labs; regulators wrote it into monographs and protocols, pushing its acceptance from bench to production line.
The main draw for sodium 1-pentanesulfonate monohydrate lies in its use as an ion-pairing reagent, especially in reversed-phase HPLC. Formulated as a white to off-white powder, this product brings reliable batch-to-batch consistency and purity, thanks to refined modern processes. In practice, labs order this chemical for the way it amplifies detection of polar analytes that otherwise wouldn't separate well on standard columns. Experienced scientists trust the monohydrate form because of its measured water content, which supports stability during storage and ensures accurate preparation. In the markets, customers appreciate how the product's compatibility with buffers and solvents translates to results they can trust—far fewer headaches from unpredictable baseline drifts or ghost peaks in chromatograms.
Sodium 1-pentanesulfonate monohydrate (C5H11SO3Na·H2O) stands out as a crystalline, free-flowing powder, not prone to caking under proper storage. The molecular weight falls around 206.23 g/mol including water of hydration, which is critical when scaling recipes in HPLC method development. It dissolves readily in water, forming clear solutions that can carry analytes efficiently through chromatography columns. The sulfonate group's strong ionic character helps keep the compound stable under acidic and neutral pH. With a melting point above standard lab room temperatures, sodium 1-pentanesulfonate handles transport and storage without much fuss. Direct sunlight and high humidity can cause minor clumping, so closed containers work best to keep the powder reliable.
The product typically comes labeled for 98-100% purity by titration. High-end supply chains now back these labels with chromatographic and spectroscopic analyses—proven measures, not just marketing. Impurities like other alkyl sulfonates, sodium sulfate, and residual solvents get flagged due to their tendency to interfere with high-sensitivity analysis. Manufacturers stamp batch numbers and expiration dates on packaging for traceability, which helps labs stay compliant during audits. The labels clarify recommended handling, storage temperatures (15-25°C, away from moisture), and the safety codes required under current chemical regulations. These details keep lab managers confident, without inconvenient calls to technical support chasing missing specs.
Manufacturers synthesize sodium 1-pentanesulfonate by sulfonating pentane—usually through direct reaction with sulfur trioxide or chlorosulfonic acid, in a controlled apparatus. Adding sodium hydroxide neutralizes the resulting pentanesulfonic acid, producing the sodium salt. The monohydrate crystallizes as the solution cools, with slow evaporation or seeding to guide the process. Modern facilities use closed systems with in-line purification, swapping in multiple crystallizations or activated carbon treatments to clean up the raw powder. Personal experience in a regulated lab taught me the difference between shortcut chemistry and a well-controlled, multi-step process. The quality of crystalline product, as confirmed by both NMR and HPLC, reflects this extra work.
Sodium 1-pentanesulfonate typically plays a stable, spectator role in chemical processes, owing to the unreactive sulfonate group under routine lab conditions. Still, researchers push limits by altering the alkyl chain, tweaking reactivity, or swapping counter-ions for custom separation challenges. Strong acids can free the sulfonic acid, yet the sodium form resists hydrolysis, oxidation, or reduction across most practical uses. Folks in synthesis labs have tried direct alkylation and oxidative cleavage when seeking derivatives, but these routes call for specialized waste management. The compound’s greatest influence comes through ion-pair interactions, especially with basic analytes in solution—one reason why biotech and pharma R&D teams never stray far from it.
Across catalogs, the chemical carries a confusing family of names: sodium n-pentanesulfonate, sodium pentylsulfonate, and sodium 1-pentylsulfonate. Having worked with global suppliers, I’ve seen these synonyms slow down procurement or even spark mix-ups. Reliable vendors always include CAS registry number (22767-49-3) to cut through the noise. Some companies market this as an “HPLC ion-pairing reagent,” though seasoned users zero in on the chain length rather than just a broad function. The alternative names trace back to both IUPAC conventions and easier-to-remember commercial labels.
Lab professionals treat sodium 1-pentanesulfonate monohydrate with basic chemical safety: gloves, dust masks, well-ventilated benches. The compound lacks acute toxicity at workplace exposure levels, but it can irritate the eyes and respiratory tract if handled carelessly. In my own bench work, scooping out fine powders always kicked up some dust; a fume hood or powder-safe workstation solved that problem. Waste runs through local approved disposal channels, not down the sink. EU CLP and OSHA globally harmonized system guidelines anchor all labeling and safety literature, which helps prevent accidents even as junior staff rotate in. Packaging in double-sealed bags or tamper-evident containers protects both users and the compound from atmospheric moisture.
Chromatography labs rely heavily on sodium 1-pentanesulfonate as a mobile phase additive for HPLC, especially to enhance the resolution of basic drugs, amino acids, and peptides. It finds a niche in quality assurance for pharmaceutical manufacturing, where consistent analyte detection makes the difference between batch approval and costly recalls. I've seen this compound unlock tricky separations where other ion-pairing agents like sodium heptanesulfonate proved too hydrophobic. Food safety and environmental monitoring labs also lean on its efficiency to separate charged pesticides and herbicide metabolites. Researchers choose the monohydrate form for the control it brings to buffer pH and ionic strength, essential for reproducible findings.
Ongoing R&D circles back to reducing sodium 1-pentanesulfonate’s impact on column longevity and detector fouling in HPLC instruments. A few published papers explore biodegradable analogs for green chemistry goals. Instrument firms now balance lithium, potassium, or ammonium alternatives for specialized, low-sodium analytical setups. Teams in bioanalytical method development look at modifying the compound to tune ionic strength in advanced applications, including mass spectrometry compatibility. I've attended conferences where teams swapped stories about shrinking sample prep times, thanks in part to more precise ion-pairing with this reagent.
Available toxicology data categorize sodium 1-pentanesulfonate monohydrate as low hazard in acute exposure; animal studies show minimal absorption through the skin and rapid renal elimination. Data from environmental toxicity testing place it in a low-moderate range for aquatic impact, consistent with other small alkyl sulfonates. Chronic exposure data remains limited, but no evidence so far suggests mutagenic or carcinogenic effects at workplace concentrations. Regulatory bodies still ask for ongoing periodic reviews, and some pharmaceutical excipient guides specify limits for residual sulfonates, a nod to the conservative approach that keeps consumer safety above all else. Lab teams track spills meticulously and keep safety data sheets accessible for compliance reviews.
The future points to tighter integration of sodium 1-pentanesulfonate in smart, automated sample preparation platforms. Researchers work to cut reagent waste and streamline buffer recipes, knowing this compound’s predictable performance can support robust algorithms for predictive separations. Green chemistry pressure will likely drive changes in synthesis and waste disposal—look for more pilot projects converting petro-based feedstocks to renewable or recycled sources. The move toward ultratrace detection in biologics and food safety ensures demand remains steady, boosting calls for ultra-pure, low-endotoxin grades. From what I've seen at recent analytical trade shows, industry feedback steers development toward customization, letting end users select additives like sodium 1-pentanesulfonate based on real problem-solving, not just catalog specs.
Sodium 1-pentanesulfonate monohydrate might sound like a mouthful, but in my years peering over chromatograms in the lab, it’s one of those chemicals that quietly takes on tough jobs. Chemists often talk about it as an “ion-pairing agent.” What this really means—for those who don’t live and breathe chromatography—is that it helps scientists make sense of stubborn mixtures. This chemical excels in high-performance liquid chromatography, or HPLC, especially when separating molecules that cling stubbornly, refusing to move on their own.
Some compounds just don’t want to split up in water. Take basic drugs or polar metabolites. They slip straight through reversed-phase columns, ignoring all the careful gradients and solvents you feed them. After wrestling with those mixtures, I found that a dash of sodium 1-pentanesulfonate can coax them to stick around long enough to analyze. This agent binds temporarily to molecules, giving them just enough bulk and hydrophobicity to grab onto the column. The result: cleaner peaks, more reliable data.
Pharmaceutical labs count on accuracy. The difference between a contaminant and a legitimate drug can sit at the tiniest change in a chromatogram peak. I’ve watched teams working on quality control turn to sodium 1-pentanesulfonate when nothing else seemed to work. Regulatory groups like the FDA demand that manufacturers prove their products are safe and effective. If the tools aren’t sensitive enough, a contaminated batch slips by or, worse, a good drug gets pulled. That’s why chemists trust this reagent when other tricks fall short.
Outside of drug labs, the same principle applies. Public analysts testing food for banned or harmful substances rely on sodium 1-pentanesulfonate to pick betraying molecules out of the noise. It can turn a tangled web of amino acids or pesticides into readable results. This is about more than regulatory checklists—it’s about getting dangerous stuff out of baby formula, out of water, out of the food we serve our families.
Working with any chemical brings risk. Sodium 1-pentanesulfonate might seem mild compared to acids and strong solvents, but good lab habits apply. Gloves, goggles, and a clear idea of what to do if it spills make all the difference. Science wins when people respect the risks and treat these substances like the tools they are.
Chemistry keeps moving. The push for greener techniques is growing, and labs want less reliance on sulfates and sulfonates. Water-based solvents, newer column materials, and biodegradable ion-pairing agents are slowly entering the field. I’ve worked in labs where trial and error led to surprising alternatives—sometimes even plant-based surfactants. The catch: not every replacement matches the crisp, sharp resolution that sodium 1-pentanesulfonate brings.
Every tool in a chemist’s kit should justify its spot. Sodium 1-pentanesulfonate fills a unique role. Until something better comes along, labs rely on it for honest results. Whether you’re saving a batch of medicine or screening water for toxins, this chemical averages out as an ally for anyone who cares about safety and truth in science.
Chemistry may seem like a world tucked away in labs, but its basics show up in everyday choices. A chemical formula tells us which elements make up a substance, such as H2O for water. The molecular weight, measured in atomic mass units (amu or g/mol), tells how heavy one molecule is.
Suppose you’re cleaning the kitchen and reach for baking soda. Glancing at the box, you spot NaHCO3: sodium, hydrogen, carbon, and oxygen bundled into one small molecule. The molecular weight reaches about 84 g/mol. This knowledge isn’t just trivia. Understanding the formula helps avoid confusion with other white powders—washing soda, for example, uses Na2CO3, so it reacts differently in your recipes or cleaning routines.
Every year, stories surface about people confusing household chemicals and causing accidents. A basic understanding of a formula or molecular weight provides a safety net. If you recognize that vinegar’s acetic acid, C2H4O2, won’t give off chlorine gas when mixed with bleach but learned chlorine cleaner can react badly with ammonia (NH3), you’ll probably sidestep a dangerous mistake.
Pharmacists, for instance, dispense medicines calculated to milligrams using molecular weight. Misreading a formula isn’t just an inconvenience—it can cause real harm. Take acetaminophen: its formula C8H9NO2 points to a molecular weight of 151 g/mol. Dosing depends on accuracy, ensuring what reaches patients matches exact prescriptions.
Researchers spend time cross-checking formulas and weights before starting experiments. A single digit or element typo can ruin weeks of work or cause unexpected reactions. Seeing the importance of precision makes it obvious why training always covers formulas in detail—not to confuse, but to protect and guide.
These days, food packaging lists ingredients and sometimes includes the precise formula of additives. Curious shoppers often find ascorbic acid (Vitamin C) labeled as C6H8O6. People with allergies use these details to avoid problem ingredients. As someone with friends allergic to sulfites, I check for SO3 in compounds before big meals together.
Online forums are filled with rumors about chemicals and their effects. Looking at the formula helps spot myths—especially ones that spark panic about food preservatives or cleaning supplies. Once you glimpse the simplicity of a formula, recognizing that table salt (NaCl) and the chlorine gas used in pools are worlds apart, sorting fact from fiction gets much easier.
Real confidence grows from knowledge. Kids learn water is H2O, but take that curiosity further and ask why the formula matters. The answer helps at the doctor, in the kitchen, or splicing cables in a workshop. At its core, understanding chemical formulas and molecular weights is as practical as knowing how to read a label or measure flour—the tools that keep us healthy, safe, and informed.
Many labs and chemical users overlook the basics: some compounds, like Sodium 1-Pentanesulfonate Monohydrate, respond badly to humidity, heat, and light. If you've worked with organics or salts before, you've probably seen what a bit of carelessness can do—clumping, discoloration, degraded results. Sodium 1-Pentanesulfonate Monohydrate doesn't like wet environments. Leaving a container cracked open even for a few minutes in a humid room leads to clumping and, sometimes, ruined reagent. I've seen an entire batch rendered useless just because someone left the bottle near a steaming water bath.
Glass and thick-walled plastic containers with tight, leak-free lids suit this compound best. Once, someone in my lab transferred chemicals to a flimsy snap-top box, and moisture sneaked in overnight. The next day, the powder stuck together, costing hours to salvage. Solid, screw-top jars and desiccants or drying agents—simple silica gel packets work—make a real difference. Even placing the label on the lid rather than the side helps prevent spills or confusion during quick access, especially in a busy storage area.
Heat hurts shelf life. Most users know not to store chemicals next to radiators or direct sunlight, but it’s easy to forget if the supply closet doubles as a storage room for other equipment. The ideal temperature for Sodium 1-Pentanesulfonate Monohydrate sits near room level or slightly cooler—think between 15°C and 25°C. I’ve stored it on the lower shelf of a climate-controlled cabinet, away from airflow that carries dust or particles. Avoiding dramatic daily temperature swings keeps the product in shape. LEDs beat fluorescent bulbs for overhead lighting because they generate less heat and don’t risk UV exposure.
Unlabeled or half-labeled jars float around every busy lab. To avoid confusion, clear, permanent labels matter. Include the chemical’s full name, concentration, date received, and expiration. Reagents age, sometimes faster when storage gets sloppy. I once found two containers with the same chemical but no date; nobody remembered which was new. Guesswork doesn’t cut it where standards matter. For safety, mark each container with a hazard symbol even if you think the crew remembers—fresh eyes and old hands alike benefit.
Sodium 1-Pentanesulfonate Monohydrate doesn't appreciate sitting in an open area where other powders or solutions get measured. Residues from gloves, scoops, or nearby chemicals sneak in, even from a quick transfer. Always use dedicated scoops—never touch the inside of the container with damp or contaminated utensils. Work on a clean surface, and clean up any spills right away to sidestep accidental mixing or reaction. Wear gloves and eye protection, not just for your safety but to keep sweat or skin oils from compromising the stock chemical.
Even with the best storage, some product gets old or spills happen. Have a chemical waste container nearby and use it—don’t dump anything down the sink. Keep a material safety data sheet on hand. If you work with others, a five-minute team refresher about the proper handling and emergency spill steps each month pays off. One quick review can sidestep a ruined batch, a chemical burn, or lost hours in the lab. Safe, organized habits don’t slow down progress; they save resources and prevent hazards before they ever happen.
Talk to anyone who’s spent time working on a farm or in a busy repair shop, and you’ll hear stories of accidents that happen when people treat something familiar as harmless. Diesel, cleaning fluids, garden fertilizers—items like these aren’t marked with skull-and-crossbones, but they can cause real trouble if people don’t give them respect. Not every material looks dangerous. Bleach burned my cousin’s hands years ago. She thought rubber gloves only mattered for acids. Many products around the house fall into that category—think battery acid, small propane tanks, even certain cleaning sprays that react if mixed. These things seem routine, but without care, they lead to burns, fires, or worse.
A simple check for hazard warnings doesn’t always tell the whole story. Some businesses push ahead because they’ve “always done it that way.” People transfer chemicals from a big drum to a smaller bottle, then lose the label. By the time someone asks what’s inside, nobody remembers, and now there’s a bottle of mystery fluid sitting in the corner. It’s not about neglect; it’s about routine creeping up and erasing good habits. According to the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, tens of thousands of workplace injuries each year trace back to improper handling of substances that looked safe.
Some dangers aren’t even visible. Fine dust from flour or wood in the air can trigger explosions in the right concentration. I spent a few summers working construction, and saw sawdust clouds hang in the sunlight. The crew always swept up, but nobody talked about the risk of combustion. Paint fumes and solvents seep through skin and can linger in closed garages; years later, workers cough, develop rashes, or worse. Not long ago, a bakery in Georgia saw a huge explosion traced back to flour dust—a shock to folks who figured such things happened only in factories with big chemical vats.
People don’t need a chemistry degree to stay safe. What helps is a steady habit of reading instructions and not getting lazy about gear. Gloves, masks, and proper containers prevent most accidents before they start. Clean hands and clear labels go a long way. In my experience, the most useful thing has been the regular “tailgate talks” safety meetings. Sharing stories—near misses, burns, the day the shop almost caught fire—reminds everyone about what’s at stake.
Responsibility falls across the board. Companies have to offer honest training and supply the right gear, not just meet the letter of the law. That means giving workers enough time to finish jobs safely, not rushing them with unrealistic deadlines. Individuals need to leave behind shortcuts. It isn’t only their arms or eyes on the line—mistakes can hurt bystanders, family, or neighbors in ways that last. Regulators and community leaders should spot-check and enforce rules where people cut corners. Sharing clear information, not just jargon or technical sheets, helps everyone understand the real risks lurking in the familiar.
Anyone who’s ever wondered about that bag of sugar from the supermarket, or maybe a supplement pulled off a pharmacy shelf, usually bumps into the concept of purity or grade at some point. Purity affects everything — from how something tastes, all the way to whether it’s safe for a kid to swallow. Most of us use products every day, trusting that what’s in the package matches what’s on the label. For folks in labs, workshops, or kitchens, this level of trust shapes decisions and habits.
Growing up, my dad worked in a food factory. He always swore you could taste the difference between brown sugar run through strict refining and the stuff off an old mill. The numbers tend to prove his taste buds right. Food-grade products sit at around 97–99% pure, good enough for eating or drinking. Pharmaceutical-grade steps it up, usually sticking above 99%, sometimes much tighter, as required by major health authorities around the globe. Any small slip-up here means risk.
Consider things outside of food and medicine. Cleaning supplies, industrial raw materials, and even water for electronics can lose their effectiveness or become unsafe with low-purity starting ingredients. No worker enjoys handling unpredictable batches, either. Companies facing recalls or reputation damage eventually choose to invest in tighter quality checks rather than gamble with cheaper, unproven sources.
The difference between a junk batch and a top-shelf product often boils down to strict verification in the factory. Reliable suppliers embrace regular lab checks. In pharma, that means full traceability — batch numbers down to the molecular fingerprint. Food brands take cues from international guidelines, like Codex Alimentarius. The best businesses post certifications, lot numbers, and even lab results online. Someone with chemistry chops can look up “Reagent Grade” or “USP Grade” for a nearly textbook-safe choice every time.
I once visited a friend who roasts specialty coffee. She wanted to know why one month’s beans dissolved so differently after grinding. Turned out the difference was the stepless attention paid to drying, washing, and handling—All these small steps directly impact the organic acid profile, which boils down to how pure each batch stays through the supply chain. Mistakes rarely hide for long.
Problems come up most often where shortcuts get taken, or regulations aren’t enforced. Poor oversight lets fake or contaminated products sneak in. Real transparency, enforced by strict regulators and third-party audits, makes it harder to cheat or bluff about batch quality. Solid traceability, documentation, and published test results leave a paper trail.
Anyone buying specialty goods, supplements, or chemicals should ask for certificates of analysis or lab documentation up front. The price difference between high and low purity products can be huge; paying for quality early often means lower risk, less waste, and peace of mind. For folks working behind the scenes, investing in staff training and reliable lab equipment pays for itself, with fewer batch failures and more predictable results for customers.
No one enjoys disappointment, and real health risks make shortcuts costly. By demanding honest data and knowing what real purity looks like, regular shoppers and professionals can keep themselves, their families, and their businesses out of trouble.
| Names | |
| Preferred IUPAC name | sodium 1-pentanesulfonate monohydrate |
| Other names |
1-Pentanesulfonic acid sodium salt monohydrate Sodium pentanesulfonate monohydrate Sodium n-pentanesulfonate monohydrate Sodium valeric sulfonate monohydrate |
| Pronunciation | /ˈsəʊdiəm wʌn pɛnˈteɪn.sʌlˌfə.neɪt ˌmɒn.oʊˈhaɪdreɪt/ |
| Identifiers | |
| CAS Number | 22767-49-3 |
| 3D model (JSmol) | `C(C)CCCCS(=O)(=O)O.Na.O` |
| Beilstein Reference | 1758733 |
| ChEBI | CHEBI:91243 |
| ChEMBL | CHEMBL3303552 |
| ChemSpider | 16211174 |
| DrugBank | DB11110 |
| ECHA InfoCard | 100043-88-5 |
| EC Number | NA |
| Gmelin Reference | 75409 |
| KEGG | C14170 |
| MeSH | D020071 |
| PubChem CID | 163283887 |
| RTECS number | TC8750000 |
| UNII | 9P5833SLL2 |
| UN number | UN2811 |
| Properties | |
| Chemical formula | C5H11SO3Na·H2O |
| Molar mass | 276.34 g/mol |
| Appearance | White to off-white powder |
| Odor | Odorless |
| Density | 1.266 g/cm³ |
| Solubility in water | soluble |
| log P | -4.2 |
| Vapor pressure | Negligible |
| Acidity (pKa) | -2.8 |
| Basicity (pKb) | -6.5 |
| Magnetic susceptibility (χ) | -53.0e-6 cm³/mol |
| Refractive index (nD) | 1.390 |
| Dipole moment | 2.98 D |
| Thermochemistry | |
| Std molar entropy (S⦵298) | 326.6 J·mol⁻¹·K⁻¹ |
| Hazards | |
| GHS labelling | GHS05, GHS07 |
| Pictograms | GHS05,GHS07 |
| Signal word | Warning |
| Hazard statements | H302, H315, H319, H335 |
| Precautionary statements | P264, P270, P301+P312, P330, P501 |
| NFPA 704 (fire diamond) | 1-1-0 |
| Lethal dose or concentration | Lethal dose or concentration: LD50 Oral Rat: 2230 mg/kg |
| LD50 (median dose) | LD50 Oral Rat 670 mg/kg |
| NIOSH | WN3485000 |
| PEL (Permissible) | PEL (Permissible Exposure Limit) for Sodium 1-Pentanesulfonate Monohydrate: Not established |
| REL (Recommended) | 100 mg/L |
| Related compounds | |
| Related compounds |
Pentanesulfonic acid 1-Pentanesulfonic acid sodium salt Sodium hexanesulfonate Sodium butanesulfonate Sodium octanesulfonate |
