© 2026 Nanjing Finechem Holdings Co., Ltd,
All Right Reserved
p-Methoxyphenylacetic acid didn’t arrive on the scene yesterday. Organic chemists started paying attention to this aromatic acid decades ago, digging into its quirks to serve both academic curiosity and the commercial push for better materials. The roots of methoxy-substituted benzylic acids run deep in the traditions of organic synthesis. Early research focused on the core structure— a benzene ring with a carboxylic acid hanging at the end, dressed up with a methoxy group at the para spot. That little tweak on the ring, shifting an H for an OCH3, sparked a flurry of experiments that moved from dusty glassware to real-world applications. Researchers learned fast that a small functional group turns a simple molecule into a workhorse.
Experience in the lab often tells more than numbers on a sheet. p-Methoxyphenylacetic acid forms white crystals that catch the light, melting not far above room temperature. You recognize its mild, sweet aroma the first time you open a fresh bottle. This simplicity is deceptive: each molecule packs an aromatic core with a flexible side chain pointing toward countless transformations. Solubility often depends on where you try to dissolve it, but alcohol and ethers open their arms to it much more than water does. Stability in air stays above what you sometimes expect from other acids. The methoxy group, with its electron-donating push, softens the acidity, shaping reactivity down the line.
People with chemistry in their bones check more than the product title. Labeling needs to go straight to essentials, not fluff. Purity—often 98% or better—sets the standard, as trace impurities invite trouble once you start modifying the scaffold. Physical forms (usually a powder or crystalline solid), molecular formula (C9H10O3), and expected melting point sharpen the picture, helping chemists line up their glassware for a new batch or purification. Labels that spell out potential hazards aren’t just legalese; they keep hands and eyes intact. Every bottle needs clarity: what’s inside, how it acts, and what to watch out for under standard lab conditions.
Most routes to p-methoxyphenylacetic acid lean on time-tested organic reactions. A classic method takes anisole, swings an acetic acid equivalent onto its para-position using Friedel–Crafts acylation, and finishes with a few careful steps—oxidation, crystallization, and often painstaking purification. Modern students learn that more efficient, greener paths can lead there too, thanks to catalytic reactions and enzymatic tweaks that cut down on waste. That practicality matters outside the lab; scaling up means finding preparation routes that avoid expensive or dangerous reagents, even if it means rethinking old recipes. My own work showed me that the best procedures rely not just on the textbook, but on keeping an eye on what comes out of each flask and adjusting before bottlenecks hit.
Once in hand, p-methoxyphenylacetic acid doesn’t sit unused. Its reactivity invites a host of transformations. Chemists routinely convert its acid group into esters for fragrance design, work up amides on the way to pharmaceuticals, or tap its side chain for cyclizations that yield new aromatic rings. Oxidation can extend the backbone or reveal aldehyde functions, opening new doors in synthetic planning. The ortho/para-directing power of the methoxy group creates opportunities for substitution where others molecules leave you hamstrung. Bringing this acid to life in the flask often unlocks new challenges, as subtle shifts in conditions can turn a smooth reaction bumpy—or point toward a surprise discovery unexpected from literature homework.
Science rarely sticks with a single name for a molecule. On the shelf or in a catalog, p-methoxyphenylacetic acid might pop up as 4-methoxyphenylacetic acid, para-methoxyphenylacetic acid, or sometimes as anistylacetic acid. If you’ve spent time in interdisciplinary labs, you see yet another face: it’s both an aromatic acid and, in some eyes, an essential starting material with a track record crossing fragrance chemistry, polymer science, and pharmaceutical research. Each label tells its story and can trace back to a different tradition—reminding you that chemistry’s language is always moving.
Chemistry’s progress relies not only on innovation, but on safety that becomes habit instead of afterthought. Even relatively benign phenylacetic acids don’t deserve carelessness. Direct contact with the skin can cause irritation, and inhaling dust from finely-powdered samples has caught even seasoned chemists off guard. Good ventilation, proper gloves, and eye protection are essential background steps—just like keeping acids and bases in their proper places. Disposal isn’t about dumping—it’s about thinking ahead, using collection for organic waste so nothing toxic ends up where it shouldn’t. Each safety sheet might seem repetitive, but following them separates accident-free projects from disasters. My own rules: treat every move as if a student’s watching, stick to small volumes when testing new reactions, and trust the data from safety agencies over rumors from colleagues.
For many, p-methoxyphenylacetic acid signals opportunity. Pharmaceutical teams value its versatility in building active ingredients—substituted aromatic acids weave into antihistamines, anticonvulsants, and emerging drug candidates. Perfume house chemists reach for it, chasing the type of delicate, lingering scent that only aromatic esters can provide. Synthetic organic research leans on its scaffolding properties: a sturdy launchpad for new heterocycles, fluorinated analogues, or functionalized biaryls. Students often begin their careers designing and modifying it, finding that simple building blocks often unlock deeper insights about mechanism, yield, and selectivity. In my experience, seeing this acid take shape in a flask was less about the final weigh-out, and more about building confidence to push further in synthesis—knowing that a single molecule’s story ties together historical methods, current demand, and unpredictable breakthroughs.
No compound—natural or synthetic—sidesteps toxicology. Data on p-methoxyphenylacetic acid shows low acute oral and dermal toxicity in small animal studies, but chronic exposure still raises flags for long-term hazards. Some analogues, once hailed as benign, revealed hidden risks to kidneys or liver at high doses over extended periods. Rigorous research digs into metabolic pathways in human and animal models, tracking breakdown products that occasionally cross-react with enzymes or proteins. Studies call attention to the possibility of allergy risk in fragrance workers. In practice, good laboratory standards—well-fitted gloves, good air circulation, proper storage—cut these dangers to nearly zero for professionals. Even so, every update on toxicity reinforces that old habits need refreshing now and then, especially as new research identifies effects not covered by decades-old tests.
Every time a chemist handles p-methoxyphenylacetic acid, they connect history with possibility. The demand for efficient, safer, and more sustainable synthesis grows, pushing research toward catalysts that work at lower temperatures, enzymes that deliver selectivity, and greener solvents that respect both product and environment. Industry looks to tweak the methoxy substituent for better bioavailability or unique scents, and exploratory work hints at its value in constructing polymers with new properties. The biggest challenge lies in distinguishing old utility from new potential—recognizing that every well-known starting material, revisited with modern tools, can yield fresh surprises. Emerging research links this acid to antitumor and neuroactive effects, hinting at roles that barely registered even a decade ago. What keeps me interested isn’t the certainty of discovering something new every day, but the knowledge that every method, every test, has the chance to reshape how we see a compound as familiar as p-methoxyphenylacetic acid.
Ask any chemist about p-Methoxyphenylacetic acid, and you’ll notice a spark in their eye—this compound’s structure isn’t just for textbooks. Take a look at its backbone: it has a phenyl ring, something you’d recognize as the classic six-carbon benzene core. What’s unique here is the group attached to that ring. You see a methoxy group at the para position—think of an oxygen linked to a methyl, both hanging directly across from the main chain attachment. Following that trail, the acetic acid group gives it both a carboxyl (-COOH) and a two-carbon side chain, forming a complete picture: C9H10O3.
Structure matters here. The para-methoxy substitution changes the way this molecule behaves, both chemically and physically. In my own organic lab days, it was clear the position of a single group could change solubility, reactivity, even how easily you could purify the stuff. The methoxy on the para position is electron-donating, making the aromatic ring more reactive towards electrophilic substitution. This isn’t just trivia—it’s how you get cleaner reactions or dodge byproducts that waste your efforts.
It’s easy to miss why the structure deserves attention. p-Methoxyphenylacetic acid pops up in pharmaceutical research, fragrance chemistry, and as a building block in organic synthesis. In chemistry labs, researchers use it to make compounds with real-world impact—from antihistamines to aroma compounds. The electron-donating nature of the methoxy group speeds up certain chemical reactions, which means more efficient production. Anyone who’s ever tried to scale up a reaction knows that small efficiency gains stack up to big savings.
Safety always takes priority, and knowing the molecular structure helps scientists predict how a compound might behave in the body or environment. For example, that carboxylic acid group can increase water solubility compared to simple aromatics, making this molecule less likely to bioaccumulate. Chemists rely on those details to make choices that protect workers and the planet. The structure also determines how quickly the compound breaks down—helping avoid stubborn, long-lived pollutants.
Looking back, understanding the structure of a molecule was never just about memorizing formulas for a test. Practical knowledge of resonance effects and electron shifts lets researchers design tailored syntheses, avoid pitfalls, and create safer byproducts. Interactive tools and visualization software can make the structure more accessible for students and professionals alike, letting everyone see why a methoxy group at the para position can be a game-changer.
Finding new uses for p-Methoxyphenylacetic acid depends on grasping how its atoms fit together. Green chemistry approaches could boost the compound’s appeal by using the right catalysts and solvents based on its functional groups. Open databases and transparent sharing of reaction conditions drive smarter research and help newcomers avoid repeating old mistakes. With the right foundation, innovation gets a boost right from the level of the molecule’s shape.
Organizations like PubChem and the American Chemical Society make verified details about compounds like p-Methoxyphenylacetic acid available, supporting researchers who count on reliable data. Staying curious and building from these basics keeps the work honest and impactful.
p-Methoxyphenylacetic acid plays a key role in organic chemistry labs and research projects. Its backbone carries a methoxy group attached to a phenyl ring, linked to an acetic acid group. At first glance, this molecule looks simple, but its real impact shows up in how labs use it to build complex substances. This acid serves as a versatile starting block for making new chemicals.
In drug research, chemists often pick p-methoxyphenylacetic acid for its solid performance building core drug structures. The methoxy group offers a site that can steer how a molecule works in the body, often making drugs more effective or less toxic. The acid group gives chemists a handle for attaching new functional groups or linking two parts of a molecule together. As a result, pharmaceutical labs use this acid to make prototypes for painkillers, anti-inflammatory medicine, and even antidepressants. Literature shows p-methoxy-linked compounds show promise as serotonin receptor agents, pushing research on mental health medication forward.
Flavors and fragrance designers have their eyes on p-methoxyphenylacetic acid too. Because of its structure, this acid helps build sweet-smelling molecules in perfumes and flavors for foods. The methoxyphenyl motif has a history of creating scents that smell pleasant and warm, often with powdery or creamy notes. Teams in the flavor industry use it as a foundation, tweaking its structure to match the right fragrance for confections and lotions. From what I've seen, one change to the molecule’s side-chain can shift a bland aroma to something that feels lively and fresh.
Research teams on the academic side often turn to p-methoxyphenylacetic acid during studies of reaction mechanisms. It’s reliable, reacts predictably, and takes part in condensation reactions, amide formation, or as a building block for heterocycles. This predictability lets teams test new reaction conditions or catalysts, then transfer those conditions to larger industrial runs. I’ve noticed small-scale labs choosing it to try out new green chemistry techniques because it stands up to different solvents and conditions without falling apart.
With the emergence of precision medicine and designer materials, p-methoxyphenylacetic acid’s versatility means researchers aren’t close to finishing what’s possible with it. More work connecting lab findings to clinical advancements would help bring new drugs to market faster. Researchers could benefit from sharing more open data on toxicology and bioactivity, using collaborative databases to flag promising p-methoxy derivatives early in the process.
Safe handling should not get overlooked. This acid is stable under most lab settings, but teams must use gloves, goggles, and good ventilation because of the potential for skin or eye irritation. Adopting clear safety training, setting consistent protocols, and peer checks help everyone stay safe, especially as research volumes grow.
Access to reliable sources and transparent communication from manufacturers makes a difference. Labs count on certificates of analysis and detailed origin data to ensure the purity needed for pharmaceuticals and sensitive syntheses. Trust comes from open discussion about impurities and consistent feedback loops between supplier and user. This culture of accountability and information sharing helps everyone get closer to breakthrough chemistry, step by step.
You find p-Methoxyphenylacetic acid in labs that specialize in organic synthesis. Some folks in my early research days liked to give new substances the benefit of the doubt, thinking, “It’s just an aromatic acid.” I learned fast that every chemical, no matter how plain it sounds, brings its own set of risks. Handling this compound the same way as table salt or vinegar creates problems down the line. A close friend once rushed through handling phenylacetic derivatives and had to scramble for the eyewash station—never a fun reminder.
p-Methoxyphenylacetic acid shows low acute toxicity in animal studies, but don’t let that lower your guard. The compound can cause irritation if it touches skin or eyes. If you inhale its dust, the body soon reacts—think sore throat or coughing. My hands have dried out for days just from a drop or two of certain aromatic acids. You remember those little things much longer than a table of safety guidelines.
Ignore proper gear and you will regret it. Gloves, safety glasses, and a lab coat go from optional to required as soon as you open the bottle. Dust generated while weighing or transferring the acid can linger in the air; the lab’s fume hood stands up as a vital defense here. I’ve watched less experienced students scoop solid acid on an open bench, creating a visible white cloud—never a good sign.
Spills need attention right away. Use paper towels or spill pads, but keep the acid dry—mixing with water creates sticky clumps, which are even harder to get off benches and tools. Double-bag waste for disposal. Don’t dump this stuff down the drain; it’s not just the environment at stake, but also plumbing and regulatory headaches.
p-Methoxyphenylacetic acid breaks down in the environment, but it lingers long enough to reach water systems if managed carelessly. In the lab, any incident can become a case study for others. Most accidental exposures come from not washing hands before lunch. I once caught myself absent-mindedly touching my face after working with an aromatic acid. Luckily nothing dramatic happened, but it stuck as a lesson.
Regular training helps people spot sloppy habits before a major mishap. Safety audits and buddy systems for dangerous tasks change the culture over time. Substitute less hazardous materials if possible, especially in teaching labs with new students. Labels and safety sheets don’t always make an impression—real stories drive the point home.
The hard truth hits the day something goes wrong, not the day the chemical arrives. Handle p-Methoxyphenylacetic acid—and everything even slightly like it—with respect, or expect a steep learning curve. Safety comes less from paperwork, more from practice and mindfulness at every step.
p-Methoxyphenylacetic acid, sometimes called anisic acid’s close cousin, play a role in pharmaceutical synthesis and specialty chemicals. While at first glance, it looks tame—a white to almost off-white powdery solid—its shelf life and safety demand respect. Most folks in the lab have seen spills, funky odors, and surprises from mishandled organics. This one stays pretty well-behaved if you treat it right, but even stable compounds have their quirks.
Humidity beats up most organics, especially those with aromatic rings and side chains. p-Methoxyphenylacetic acid hates wet air. Exposure draws moisture, leading to lumps or, worse, hydrolysis and breakdown. Even subtle water uptake messes with purity and yield. A well-sealed amber glass jar, lined with a gasketed plastic cap and kept inside a desiccator with fresh silica gel, usually keeps everything crisp. Going for plastic? Make sure it won't leach or react, as some plastics crack or grow brittle with time.
Once, after a long holiday, I found a sample that turned yellow and crusty after sitting in a warm storeroom—a good reminder that room temperature swings bring headaches. Most references settle at two targets: room temperature (15–25°C) for daily work and refrigerator temperatures (2–8°C) for backup storage. Freezing proves overkill, and can even encourage condensation inside containers. A quick note: avoid the tops of hot lab equipment, windowsills, or shared cabinets near vents, since indirect heat can slowly degrade even the best-sealed acid.
Some aromatic acids break down under sunlight or harsh fluorescent glow. p-Methoxyphenylacetic acid, like many organics, holds up better in the dark. Those lab stories about faded labels or sun-bleached powders happen more often than one admits. Light triggers slow oxidation and color changes, which may spell issues for someone chasing analytical purity. Keep the bottle out of open light—store inside cabinets or use amber glass to block UV.
Left forgotten, even decent-quality p-Methoxyphenylacetic acid degrades. Labs should perform a yearly mass check or a melting point test if it's unclear when the bottle arrived. Any odd smell, tint, or weird melting behavior signals something’s gone awry. Chemical suppliers post shelf life recommendations—usually two to three years with good handling—which beats playing guessing games.
Spills happen—wiping powders into a waste beaker rather than a sink keeps the workspace safe. Labels matter. I once saw a bottle relabeled with fading ink—mixed up and poured into a composition, leading to a lost day and a headache. Stick to bold, permanent labeling and log the received date. For busy labs, organizing an inventory spreadsheet keeps the oldest stock up front and alerts users when time’s up.
Handling p-Methoxyphenylacetic acid comes down to vigilance. Think dry storage, sealed containers, darkness, and regular checks. What seems trivial today saves trouble in the future. Applying these best practices not only protects results but sets a quiet standard for lab safety and reliability.
A substance like p-Methoxyphenylacetic acid rarely grabs attention outside chemical circles, but anyone who’s handled it in a lab knows purity changes everything. Research doesn’t forgive impurities—they often throw off results, waste time, or even pose health risks. Fine chemicals hovering around 98% purity usually find their way into classroom demonstrations or slower-paced experimental work. Reagents above 99% hit the mark for pharmaceutical or advanced biotech use, where even a fractional impurity spells the difference between breakthrough and dead end.
Most chemical catalogues list p-Methoxyphenylacetic acid with a minimum purity of 98%—sometimes higher for specialized batches. This level serves daily synthesis work and routine laboratory demands. Those chasing new drug candidates, polymer building blocks, or signal transduction research often insist on 99% or higher. Sourcing demands critical review of impurity profiles, including water content and byproduct traces. Sloppy quality checks end up with wasted resources, failed chromatographies, or unexpected side reactions.
A quick glance at reputable supplier certificates shows a clear standard: high purity, documented testing (HPLC or GC), and full disclosure of batch origin. Testing in my own projects stuck to lots carrying a full suite of documentation, not some anonymous barrel from a trading post. Positive controls can save hours; trace contaminants never do anyone favors.
Anyone who’s ordered from chemical suppliers knows packaging shapes how easily, safely, and economically you can work. Glass bottles rule for smaller, sensitive loads—usually 25, 100, or 500 grams. For larger-scale synthesis or repeat use, high-density polyethylene bottles become the vessel of choice. I’ve found that for long-term storage or frequent access in humidity-prone labs, glass keeps interactions predictable, and screw caps with liners limit moisture intrusion.
Academic research groups and startups might only want a few grams, which most distributors provide in sealed amber glass. Major manufacturers or contract R&D firms buy up multiple kilos sealed in plastic drums—less worry about breakage and lighter, but sometimes a compromise on shelf life. Some suppliers cater to niche requests with custom sizing, but going too small jacks up cost per gram; too large increases exposure risk or wastage if shelf life runs short.
Regulations on transport, especially across borders, prompt added care. Double containment, padded insulation, and tamper-evident sealing take a front seat for air shipments or temperature-sensitive lots. Domestic users usually see simpler yet robust packaging: good enough for the bench top, and safe during local travel or limited storage.
Labs running lean keep a closer watch on shelf stability and potential contamination from containers. Years ago, one careless order—wrong container, lower grade—meant a month deciphering whether an odd reaction step was a procedural blunder or a hidden impurity. Smart suppliers mark every lot, list every storage recommendation, and share full certificates of analysis without needing a dozen email chases.
As chemistry heads further into automation, traceability matters even more. Digital management depends on knowing exactly what sits in every bottle. Nobody wants to repeat a failed process because of a stray trace. Strong supplier relationships and reliable documentation let teams focus on great science rather than on second-guessing their raw materials.
In all this, both suppliers and researchers play their part—vigilance over purity specs, honest feedback on real-world storage, and advocating for transparent labelling. These little details in handling p-Methoxyphenylacetic acid make the difference between wasted steps and real progress.
| Names | |
| Preferred IUPAC name | 2-(4-Methoxyphenyl)acetic acid |
| Other names |
4-Methoxyphenylacetic acid p-Anisylacetic acid 4-Anisylacetic acid |
| Pronunciation | /ˌpiːˌmɛθ.ɒk.siˌfiː.nɪl.əˈsiː.tɪk ˈæs.ɪd/ |
| Identifiers | |
| CAS Number | 104-01-8 |
| Beilstein Reference | 1208734 |
| ChEBI | CHEBI:90222 |
| ChEMBL | CHEMBL138442 |
| ChemSpider | 73304 |
| DrugBank | DB08319 |
| ECHA InfoCard | 100.046.840 |
| EC Number | 3.1.1.78 |
| Gmelin Reference | **7, 878** |
| KEGG | C05504 |
| MeSH | D015862 |
| PubChem CID | 82509 |
| RTECS number | DO7926000 |
| UNII | LMZ74Z5JZ9 |
| UN number | UN2811 |
| CompTox Dashboard (EPA) | DTXSID9043701 |
| Properties | |
| Chemical formula | C9H10O3 |
| Molar mass | 166.18 g/mol |
| Appearance | White to off-white crystalline powder |
| Odor | Faint floral |
| Density | 1.179 g/cm³ |
| Solubility in water | Slightly soluble |
| log P | 1.11 |
| Vapor pressure | 4.2E-4 mmHg (25°C) |
| Acidity (pKa) | 4.5 |
| Basicity (pKb) | 14.24 |
| Magnetic susceptibility (χ) | -61.5×10⁻⁶ cm³/mol |
| Refractive index (nD) | 1.554 |
| Dipole moment | 1.73 D |
| Thermochemistry | |
| Std molar entropy (S⦵298) | 211.0 J·mol⁻¹·K⁻¹ |
| Std enthalpy of formation (ΔfH⦵298) | -439.6 kJ/mol |
| Std enthalpy of combustion (ΔcH⦵298) | -1672.9 kJ/mol |
| Hazards | |
| Main hazards | Harmful if swallowed, causes skin and eye irritation |
| GHS labelling | GHS07, Warning, H315, H319, H335 |
| Pictograms | GHS07 |
| Signal word | Warning |
| Hazard statements | H302, H315, H319, H335 |
| Precautionary statements | P264, P270, P301+P312, P330, P501 |
| NFPA 704 (fire diamond) | 1-1-0 |
| Flash point | 118°C |
| Autoignition temperature | 280 °C (536 °F; 553 K) |
| Lethal dose or concentration | LD50 (oral, rat): 1960 mg/kg |
| LD50 (median dose) | LD50 (median dose): >2000 mg/kg (rat, oral) |
| NIOSH | NL |
| PEL (Permissible) | Not established |
| REL (Recommended) | 10 mg |
| Related compounds | |
| Related compounds |
Phenylacetic acid p-Hydroxyphenylacetic acid p-Methylphenylacetic acid m-Methoxyphenylacetic acid o-Methoxyphenylacetic acid |
