© 2026 Nanjing Finechem Holdings Co., Ltd,
All Right Reserved
Stories about specialty chemicals rarely make their way into everyday conversation, but the path methyl tridecanoate has followed reveals a lot about how meticulous research meets practical needs. The compound, a methyl ester derived from tridecanoic acid, came into view as researchers dug deeper into saturated fatty acids and their derivatives. During the push of the 20th century, when industrial chemists looked to expand the toolbox of functional chemicals, esters like this drew their attention for their stability and tunable properties. Back in those days, synthetic routes typically involved old-school Fischer esterification, with methanol and tridecanoic acid working together under acid catalysis. Over time, as purification and analytical technologies improved—think gas chromatography, high resolution mass spectrometry—chemists could achieve higher purity levels and more consistent performance standards. The real tipping point arrived once industries began searching for non-petrochemical ingredients with predictable profiles, especially in biotech and environmentally sensitive formulations. Here, methyl tridecanoate secured a spot both as a reference standard and as a raw material for targeted syntheses.
Anyone handling methyl tridecanoate for research or application sees a clear liquid with a faint, almost undetectable odor. Behind this simple appearance sits a versatile molecule. It balances the chain length—thirteen carbons—with a methyl group, delivering a substance that resists oxidation better than many unsaturated esters. Its melting point stands just below room temperature, so it pours reliably, while the boiling point lands well above where most lab solvents evaporate. These physical characteristics matter every time researchers run calibrations or prepare blends. Methanol and tridecanoic acid yield a product with known behavior, which makes it valuable as a calibration standard—especially where exact quantification or reference results are a must.
Technical standards developed for methyl tridecanoate reflect years spent honing measurement techniques. Precise specifications for purity, water content, and acid value stem from its role as an analytical reference. Manufacturers and end-users alike benefit from specifications enforced by established monographs. This formality keeps labs and companies aligned, whether they're using the product for chromatography, pharmaceutical synthesis, or engine testing. Labeling requirements serve a real purpose: complete chemical identifiers, CAS number, molecular formula, and relevant warnings guard against accidental misuse while helping analysts cross-check against literature references. This attention to detail increases confidence in data and product consistency.
Making methyl tridecanoate doesn't demand exotic conditions, but it does reward careful technique. The core reaction joins tridecanoic acid and methanol over an acid catalyst—often sulfuric acid—under reflux. Removing water boosts yield and shifts the equilibrium, while careful temperature control ensures a cleaner conversion. After the esterification, the work has only begun. Efficient washing, liquid-liquid extraction, and vacuum distillation separate the target ester from residual acid, water, and side products. High-purity applications use final polishing steps, such as column purification. These processes benefit from both classroom chemistry and hard-won experience on the bench.
Methyl tridecanoate stands as a stable saturated ester, resisting auto-oxidation and breakdown under light exposure much better than unsaturated relatives. As a result, it serves as a useful backbone for chemical modification. Researchers put its methyl ester group to work in transesterification reactions, or they use it as a building block for more complex molecules—quaternized surfactants, lipid-based drugs, or bio-based lubricants. Its performance in these transformations hinges on the predictability of its reactivity; saponification splits it neatly back into the acid and methanol, while hydrogenation doesn’t change it much due to saturation. These traits let chemists explore both basic and applied transformations without wrestling with unstable intermediates.
Sometimes keeping track of chemical synonyms feels like navigating a maze, and methyl tridecanoate proves no exception. Across catalogs and reference books, you find names like tridecanoic acid methyl ester, methyl n-tridecanoate, or simply methyl C13:0. Despite these differences, everyone in the lab circles back to the same structure and purity requirements. This harmonization proves critical when ordering materials for high-stakes projects or validating analytical results.
Chemicals with low acute toxicity sometimes get overlooked when it comes to safety, but experience teaches caution. Methyl tridecanoate doesn't jump out as a severe hazard; it doesn’t vaporize quickly, nor does it fuel runaway reactions under standard conditions. Yet, repeated contact—especially with eyes or skin—irritates enough to warrant gloves and eye protection. Spills on the floor can turn slick, so anyone working with liters instead of milligrams must respect basic housekeeping rules. Waste disposal deserves equal thought, since even "benign" chemicals gum up drain systems or end up in water supplies unless managed correctly. Regulations and safety reviews recommend keeping methyl tridecanoate in tightly closed containers, away from strong oxidizers and heat sources, helping prevent both contamination and unexpected incidents.
In labs and factories, methyl tridecanoate earns a steady reputation as both a research tool and a performance ingredient. Analytical chemistry labs run it as a calibration standard for gas and liquid chromatography when quantifying fatty acid esters or profiling lipid compositions. Its consistency eases cross-comparisons between studies and across borders. Manufacturers looking for tailored emollients, slow-evaporating solvents, or specialized intermediates draw on it for its physical and chemical predictability. The fuel sector turns to medium-chain methyl esters like this during biodiesel development, where cold-flow properties and oxidative stability offer a test bed for new additive packages. Pharmaceutical scientists include it during formulation of lipid nanoparticles, exploring its effects on encapsulation and release properties. The reach of methyl tridecanoate keeps expanding as more industries pivot toward bio-based and specialty chemicals.
Technical progress does not advance on autopilot; each year brings refinements in how methyl tridecanoate gets assessed, purified, and applied. Academic groups push into novel analytical uses, leveraging its sharp chromatographic profile to validate new detection methods. Bioengineering researchers experiment with enzymatic routes to produce it under milder, greener conditions—using engineered microbes or biocatalysts instead of classical acid catalysis. These efforts connect to real priorities: reducing process waste, improving selectivity, and squeezing every gram of value from renewable feedstocks. As regulations squeeze down on petroleum derivatives, R&D circles increasingly revisit medium-chain methyl esters as benchmarks and raw materials for next-gen surfactants, lubricants, and pharmaceutical carriers.
Methyl tridecanoate does not populate headlines about chemical incidents or health hazards, but toxicologists approach new and old compounds with equal concern. Published studies, including those cited by regulatory bodies, place this methyl ester in the category of low acute toxicity by oral and dermal routes. Testing in animal models, at dosage levels relevant to occupational and consumer exposures, points to a low chance of organ damage or mutagenic effects. Labs still track cumulative exposure, focusing on sensitization and long-term outcomes, since even "safe" chemicals create problems if misused or if byproducts build up in the environment. Responsible companies and researchers rely on transparent reporting and data from in vitro and in vivo studies to confirm risk profiles. As sustainability rises up the agenda, toxicity data helps companies justify phase-ins or replacements, showing stakeholders what really happens beyond lab notebooks.
Looking ahead, methyl tridecanoate stands ready for a broader stage. With regulatory and market pressure favoring medium-chain, non-toxic, and biodegradable ingredients, its attributes check several boxes for a growing roster of brands and researchers. More efficient biotechnological pathways—using renewable raw materials and fermentation—promise to drive down both costs and environmental impacts. At the same time, the hunt for new applications will lean on its stable profile and clean reactivity. Areas like advanced lubricants, specialty coatings, and drug delivery demand intermediates that handle both performance specs and regulatory scrutiny. To stay relevant, researchers and producers will keep refining methodologies, gathering safety data, and building a case for methyl tridecanoate as a core part of tomorrow’s chemical landscape.
Methyl tridecanoate shows up in labs with the formula C14H28O2. This means it has 14 carbon atoms, 28 hydrogens, and 2 oxygens. Breaking it down further, the “methyl” part tells you there’s a methyl group attached to the tridecanoic acid back bone, forming an ester. Tridecanoic acid by itself has a chain of 13 carbons, so the methyl group creates the classic methyl ester structure used for both analytical and industrial work. Seeing that formula on a bottle tells a chemist exactly what’s inside.
I’ve watched researchers put a lot of energy into sourcing the right reference standards. In the quality control process, using methyl tridecanoate with a confirmed formula ensures the results they collect actually match “the real thing.” Even small mistakes in the formula cost time and money, especially in fields dependent on tight tolerances such as food safety or fuel additives. The wrong formula can trip up mass spectrometry. That’s not just some geeky concern—mistake in the standard can send a ripple effect throughout a batch of results, setting back projects and reducing confidence in the data.
In chromatography training sessions, the importance of these reference materials often becomes clear. We see young analysts comparing retention times and laying standards side by side. The entire method validation depends on someone double-checking chemical formulas and certificate of analysis paperwork. Methyl tridecanoate acts as a mid-chain fatty acid ester, making it a regular player in fat and oil analysis. If the formula doesn’t match what’s intended, split peaks and calibration errors follow. This is not theorizing; it’s what actually happens behind the scenes.
Let’s face it: chemistry students often wonder why memorizing formulas like C14H28O2 matters outside exams. The value comes when you’re troubleshooting in the field or explaining results to a supervisor. The molecular formula decides how a compound behaves in both natural systems and man-made processes. For methyl tridecanoate, labs count on its consistency for building calibration curves and tracing the presence of certain compounds in complex biological samples. The fatty acid esters, often grouped and analyzed in series from C8 to C24, let scientists identify the fatty profile of food, oils, or even environmental samples.
Adulteration can creep into all sorts of products, whether by accident or on purpose. Having reference materials with clear, correct formulas—like C14H28O2 for methyl tridecanoate—lets producers keep tabs on authenticity and catch outliers. I once saw a team investigating why a fish oil product failed routine quality checks; the culprit was a missing or contaminated reference standard. It was a lesson in how a seemingly tiny detail can result in large-scale confusion.
Trusting a supplier that provides documentation for each batch remains important. Labs benefit from periodic checks on reference material, not just relying on supplier paperwork but running in-house verification using GC-MS or NMR. Clear labeling and proper storage make a difference; temperature swings or extended exposure can break down esters and skew future results. Making this an ongoing priority sidesteps headaches later. Teams that practice good inventory control and data review keep their research on track and avoid repeating costly mistakes.
Methyl tridecanoate standard fills several practical spots in labs and industries. I’ve seen it pop up most often in chemical analysis and quality control rooms. Analysts reach for it to calibrate equipment, especially when they check the performance of gas chromatographs and mass spectrometers. In daily life, accuracy in measurements shapes everything from food safety reports to environmental monitoring. So, when a chemical like methyl tridecanoate sets the baseline, other readings have something solid to refer back to. Labs gain more confidence—false positives or errors in identification can cost money, cause product recalls, and even compromise research. Getting the basics right starts with standards like these.
Most chemists want to trust their results. Using a standard makes sense when you’re confirming the presence of fatty acid methyl esters (FAMEs) in a sample. For example, if a testing panel wants to separate and identify the makeup of edible oils, biodiesel, or even forensic samples, methyl tridecanoate provides a reliable marker. You can see the spike it creates on an instrument readout, and you know where other components fall around it. Without a good standard, measurements drift—errors grow over time, which quickly erodes trust in entire data sets. These tools also help method validation; developing and proving that a lab test works for real-world samples often comes down to having predictable compounds for proof.
The food industry counts on clear verification for things like authenticity and contamination checks. For instance, it’s important to confirm the presence and levels of particular fatty acids in plant and dairy products. Regulators set strict safety limits; companies want to avoid any hint of mislabelling. Here, methyl tridecanoate standard acts as a stable checkpoint. Reliable data keeps products on shelves and builds trust with consumers.
The same focus on purity and verification stretches into fuels. Biodiesel gets regulated on thousands of data points. Traceability and repeatable measurements influence everything, from blending compliance to claims of environmental benefits. Calibration with methyl tridecanoate standard means each batch meets national and global requirements. If companies cut corners, vehicles run poorly and emissions rise—so these small details matter for both business and the environment.
Mistakes in oily samples, biodiesel mixtures, or forensic evidence often boil down to unreliable markers. I’ve learned firsthand that cutting out uncertainty in analytical work pays dividends. Technicians with access to well-characterized standards, like methyl tridecanoate, tend to solve tricky puzzles faster and with fewer callbacks. This isn’t just about buying a chemical off the shelf—regularly running standards, double checking calibrations, and participating in proficiency programs all keep testing honest.
Looking for real improvement? Training helps those new to the field recognize why calibration fails or instrument drift happens. Consistent documentation and standardized storage of these chemicals ensure longevity and reliability. Support from manufacturers and peer networks also matters. Labs that connect through professional groups or industry consortia often catch problems early, share best practices, and align on solutions.
Every step toward stronger science relies on sturdy reference materials. Methyl tridecanoate standard plays its part by holding up the backbone of analytical chemistry, food safety, and energy production. Accuracy and trustworthiness work hand in hand—one tiny spike on a chromatogram can signal a whole chain of safe, reliable, and efficient processes behind the scenes. Grounding methods in well-defined standards moves industries forward, one check at a time.
Working in the lab, I’ve learned that purity isn’t just a selling point. It’s trust. If you use a standard with questionable purity, everything from instrument calibration to final reporting stares back at you filled with doubt. With Methyl Tridecanoate Standard, buyers look for clarity straight off the certificate of analysis. You want a percentage, not a story. Most respected suppliers provide methyl tridecanoate with 98% or higher purity, and anything under 95% turns heads for the wrong reasons. Analytical chemistry demands minimum room for error. Those last couple of percent matter—impurities can skew gas chromatography readings, hurt reproducibility, and leave your data in question.
This isn’t just about numbers. People assume purity reflects only manufacturing skill or QC protocols. Raw material origin, storage temperatures, and even shipping containers turn into real variables. I’ve seen batches arrive with high water content just because they traveled through humidity for a day too long. Volatile esters like methyl tridecanoate pick up traces wherever possible. Labs working in critical fields—like environmental or pharma—notice. Maybe a food lab uses it to assess fatty acid methyl esters. Those peaks must be sharp, distinct, and correspond to what’s listed on product documentation. Even trace levels of plant waxes or carryover solvents alter results, sometimes so subtly you only catch it after several failed runs.
High purity for methyl tridecanoate isn’t simply about a number above 98%. High means single, well-defined peaks on gas chromatography, with minimal unidentified residues. Standards from trusted suppliers usually certify contents by GC-FID or GC-MS. Lab staff like myself pay close attention to batch numbers, documentation, and expiration dates. If I open a new vial and notice any cloudiness or a faint off-odor, I don’t use it—no matter what the paperwork says. Reliable standards simplify comparison work, especially against regulated benchmarks. Major suppliers document every trace impurity above 0.1%, if found, so you know what you’re getting, every time.
Purity on the box means little without regular quality checks. Labs can’t skip spot tests, even on highly rated standards. I’ve run side-by-side comparisons against NIST materials, noting that reputable brands hold up batch to batch. If a standard doesn’t meet listed purity, a lab risks everything from minor recalibration headaches to full reruns. With budgets and deadlines, this is a headache no researcher wants. Supplier transparency helps. Some offer full chromatograms, letting buyers see purity profiles in advance. I’ve contacted reps myself when data was unclear and appreciated straight answers. Researchers who are open with their colleagues and document sources and lot numbers add a layer of built-in quality assurance.
Better industry education solves a lot of quality headaches. Newer staff sometimes skip verification, thinking supplier reputation alone is enough. I train new techs to check batch paperwork, run a quick test, and always question oddities. Expanding lab budgets for reference standards takes upfront investment, but it pays off by preventing weeks of troubleshooting. Real-world mistakes rarely come from chemistry—it’s the small details that get missed, like carrying over low-purity standards from old stock. Keeping on top of storage, using clear labeling, and checking inventory regularly prevents bad outcomes.
Working in a laboratory for over a decade has shown me how small missteps in storage can weaken research results. Methyl Tridecanoate Standard serves a crucial role for calibration work, so keeping it reliable means paying attention to every detail. If this standard gets exposed to heat, sunlight, or moisture, accuracy in measurements slips. I’ve seen colleagues lose entire days’ worth of progress because a reagent changed before their eyes—often invisibly, slowly breaking down.
I always check the manufacturer’s storage advice, but the fundamentals never shift: keep Methyl Tridecanoate Standard cool and dry. Labs I’ve worked in set their chemical refrigerators between two and eight degrees Celsius. Room temperature could work in theory, but swings above 20°C add unnecessary risk. Basements or closets next to radiators spoil chemicals in short order. So, placing the standard in a reliable cold storage unit makes sense for long-term use. Moisture from the air creeps stealthily into improperly sealed containers and can start a slow degradation. Dry cabinets or even simple desiccators help prevent problems that boil down to neglect.
My experience tells me most organic chemicals degrade when exposed to light, especially UV. Even if a bottle isn’t clearly tinted, I always put volatile or light-sensitive materials in an area shielded from sunlight. Drawers or opaque lab cabinets do the trick. For some standards, amber bottles become a must. Air is another quiet culprit. Tight-fitting lids or crimped vials protect what’s inside. I make it a habit to re-cap containers immediately after use, and I teach every intern the same discipline. This stops oxygen from leaching in and keeps the material stable.
Every bottle needs a clear label. The name of the chemical, date opened, and the lot number give everyone in the lab accountability. Once, I found two similar-looking vials on a shelf, both unlabeled; no one could guarantee which was compromised. Tossing both cost the team time and money. In research or regulated environments, keeping a log of storage conditions adds more protection. Even simple temperature charts let you catch problems early. Automation with alarms for temperature changes brings peace of mind, especially after hours.
Good safety practice extends beyond storage. I’ve learned to always use clean equipment to withdraw the standard. Cross-contamination happens easily if one isn’t fully conscientious. Always pour or pipette from the stock into a clean vessel – never dip in directly with something used elsewhere. Storing an unused portion in a new vial, if necessary, preserves the remaining stock’s integrity. Cleaning spills right away and keeping the chemical in a dedicated area prevents avoidable accidents.
Reliable test results demand stable chemicals. Investing in a quality refrigerator and airtight containers saves pain later. Regular audits of stocks, checking expiry dates, and watching for signs of separation or discoloration keep surprises at bay. Training brings everyone up to the same standards, so no one accidentally undermines a project. I’ve seen that a culture of care—respect for every step, every standard—ensures Methyl Tridecanoate Standard, and all chemicals alongside it, remain dependable assets in every scientific toolkit.
Methyl tridecanoate shows up often in research and manufacturing, mostly as a chemical intermediate or for making esters and lubricants. This compound brings a familiar coconut scent and, being a fatty acid methyl ester, typically looks and pours like a clear, oily liquid. People ask if this chemical turns hazardous or if it deserves special attention during use. After checking various safety data sheets and my own experience in chemical handling, the real picture calls for practical respect, but not panic.
This compound has a moderate boiling point, doesn’t evaporate rapidly, and rarely poses the flammability risks that haunt volatile solvents. I remember working with esters of similar chain length, and spills didn’t fill the lab with dangerous fumes. Personal comfort comes from knowing it has not been labeled as acutely toxic, nor do regulators throw strong hazard pictograms at it. The Global Harmonized System ranks it pretty tame compared to familiar lab nasties.
Still, the catch with even “safe” chemicals lies in repeated or careless handling. For instance, methyl tridecanoate can irritate skin and eyes, just like many organic liquids. Accidents can leave skin greasy or red if someone skips gloves. Nobody in my lab wanted to find out how uncomfortable accidental eye contact could get—safety goggles became standard for everyone mixing or pouring esters, no matter their toxicity grading. Rubbing eyes out of habit risks more than a stinging sensation.
Despite a lack of wild volatility, methyl tridecanoate still catches fire given the wrong nudge. Sources peg its flash point above 100°C, so open flames and hot plates warrant distance. While it won’t explode or ignite like diethyl ether or acetone, a careless spill on a heated surface or clothing could spark trouble. Never underestimate an ignition risk—anyone working with organic liquids gets told stories about small, preventable fires.
I’ve seen benches stay sticky after a spill, making paperwork awful and attracting dust or debris. Good housekeeping helps. Use absorbent pads and gloves, and never pour leftovers in the sink. This chemical may not rank as a water pollutant on the scale of chlorinated solvents, but environmental releases still do nobody any favors. Many places treat fatty esters as mild pollutants that should travel to waste facilities.
Cotton lab coats, gloves, and goggles should become second nature. Safety data sheets list nitrile gloves as a solid barrier. A fume hood might not feel urgent with methyl tridecanoate, but if heated or mixed with stronger chemicals, it prevents exposure to irritating vapors. Eating or drinking near lab benches sends the wrong message. I’ve always treated snack breaks as sacred—away from any chemical hazards.
Label bottles and storage containers with clear, readable tags. Even though methyl tridecanoate stores well at room temperature, keeping it away from oxidizers, acids, and open flames makes for a smart plan. Reminders from seasoned colleagues drove this point home. No one regrets a few extra seconds spent tightening lids or double-checking storage.
Methyl tridecanoate probably won’t keep anyone up at night, but handling it with attention and the right tools prevents most trouble. Over time, that mindset makes even supposedly routine chemicals less likely to surprise or harm people. Whether at a research bench or on an industrial floor, respect for every bottle, big or small, keeps the work moving forward—and everybody safer.
| Names | |
| Preferred IUPAC name | Methyl tridecanoate |
| Other names |
Tridecanoic acid methyl ester Methyl tridecanoate Methyl tridecylate C13:0 methyl ester |
| Pronunciation | /ˈmɛθ.ɪl traɪˌdɛk.əˌnoʊ.eɪt ˈstæn.dɚd/ |
| Identifiers | |
| CAS Number | 1731-86-8 |
| Beilstein Reference | 2041581 |
| ChEBI | CHEBI:89377 |
| ChEMBL | CHEMBL3603381 |
| ChemSpider | 197041 |
| DrugBank | DB14096 |
| ECHA InfoCard | 17f574d1-779d-4e85-b39b-4c366e91d8d9 |
| EC Number | 266-551-1 |
| Gmelin Reference | 9227 |
| KEGG | C02578 |
| MeSH | D02.455.326.271.410 |
| PubChem CID | 12492 |
| RTECS number | OA9625000 |
| UNII | 373M77A6OP |
| UN number | UN3272 |
| CompTox Dashboard (EPA) | MN0861531 |
| Properties | |
| Chemical formula | C14H28O2 |
| Molar mass | 242.40 g/mol |
| Appearance | Clear colorless liquid |
| Odor | Fatty, waxy |
| Density | 0.86 g/mL at 25 °C (lit.) |
| Solubility in water | insoluble |
| log P | 4.97 |
| Vapor pressure | 0.00019 mmHg (25 °C) |
| Refractive index (nD) | 1.428 |
| Viscosity | 2.89 mPa·s (25°C) |
| Dipole moment | 3.58 D |
| Thermochemistry | |
| Std enthalpy of formation (ΔfH⦵298) | -783.1 kJ/mol |
| Std enthalpy of combustion (ΔcH⦵298) | -8581.7 kJ/mol |
| Pharmacology | |
| ATC code | V03AX |
| Hazards | |
| Main hazards | Harmful if swallowed. Causes serious eye irritation. Causes skin irritation. |
| GHS labelling | GHS07 |
| Pictograms | GHS07 |
| Signal word | Warning |
| Hazard statements | H319: Causes serious eye irritation. |
| Precautionary statements | Precautionary statements: P261, P264, P271, P272, P273, P280, P302+P352, P305+P351+P338, P362+P364, P501 |
| Flash point | 113 °C |
| Autoignition temperature | Autoignition temperature: 410 °C |
| LD50 (median dose) | LD50: >5000 mg/kg (oral, rat) |
| NIOSH | Not Listed |
| PEL (Permissible) | Not established |
| REL (Recommended) | 100 mg |
| Related compounds | |
| Related compounds |
Tridecanoic acid Methyl dodecanoate Methyl tetradecanoate |
