The story of Methanol-D4 traces its roots to that relentless push for scientific rigor in analytical chemistry during the late 20th century. Isotopic labeling became a practical tool as instruments like NMR and mass spectrometers matured. Researchers realized that deuterated solvents like Methanol-D4 could open new doors for accurate tracing of reaction pathways and internal standards. Labs moved from using “light” methanol to its deuterated cousin once the need for finer quantification and structural elucidation gained gravity. During my graduate studies, ordering a bottle of deuterated methanol always felt like handling gold — precious, costly, yet absolutely necessary if you cared about clean spectra or reproducible mass data. These origins speak to a deep partnership between targeted synthesis techniques and analytical needs, both pushing Methanol-D4 from a boutique compound to a staple on most lab supply shelves.
Methanol-D4, known chemically as CD3OD, serves a unique niche. By replacing most standard hydrogen atoms with deuterium, scientists reduce signal overlap and shift solvent peaks, carving out cleaner analytical windows. Industry tends to treat this material less as a bulk solvent and more as a “precision instrument” — every drop measured and reused for those cost-conscious runs. In synthetic labs, it offers an irreplaceable medium for NMR and some kinds of labeling studies. Specialty chemical catalogues usually list Methanol-D4 alongside other deuterated standards, with both purity and isotopic enrichment called out. A liter can fetch hundreds of dollars, putting the focus on careful conservation and strict contamination control.
Looking at Methanol-D4, one quickly notices its striking similarity to regular methanol in terms of appearance and basic liquid behavior. It’s colorless, transparent, and has a mild, somewhat sweet odor typical of methanol, though some chemists swear the scent carries a slightly heavier note. Its boiling point sits just a bit above its protonated sibling, typically near 65–67°C at atmospheric pressure, which can complicate distillation or separation in multi-solvent systems. The heavier atomic mass of deuterium gives CD3OD a marginally higher density, closer to 0.87 g/cm3 at room temperature. Polarity remains high, making it miscible with common solvents like water, ethanol, and chloroform. Chemical reactivity tracks closely with CH3OH, though bond strengths and kinetic isotope effects play out differently in select reactions — something that comes up much more often in synthesis-driven research than in analytical use.
Suppliers label Methanol-D4 with clear technical benchmarks, and with good reason. Any deviation in isotopic enrichment can throw off sensitive experiments. Most bottles state enrichment above 99 atom% D, referring to the four deuterium positions. Water content sits front and center in the certificate of analysis, usually under 0.05%. Impurity profiling includes light methanol, higher alcohols, and traces of acids or metals. Labels also reference the CAS number (811-98-3) and the molecular weight (36.07 g/mol, up from the 32.04 g/mol of standard methanol). Even labeling practices in the lab matter: contaminating a bottle with regular methanol, even by a couple droplets, can spike background signals and undermine weeks of work.
Making Methanol-D4 hinges on access to heavy water (D2O) as a starting point. Industrial producers swap out protium atoms for deuterium using catalytic exchange or direct synthesis. A common pathway runs formaldehyde or methyl iodide through deuterated media, then reduces the result via deuterium-enriched reducing agents such as deuterated sodium borohydride. This chemistry demands rigorous moisture control to protect the level of isotopic substitution. In small-lab syntheses, I’ve seen researchers recover spent Methanol-D4 by careful distillation, checking for H/D exchange, because every milliliter that gets contaminated means more time and money spent. Producers invest heavily in purification — repeated distillation over a strong base, molecular sieves, and deep-vacuum setups — with every step checked by NMR to ensure no partially labeled methyl or hydroxyl groups sneak through.
Chemists cherish Methanol-D4 for how it dances in both the solvent role and as a labeled reagent. It remains relatively inert in storage and standard use, though one can see subtle but important differences when using it in kinetic or mechanistic studies. Enzyme researchers watching deuterium kinetic isotope effects gain insight into bond-breaking steps – a trick not feasible with regular solvents. Radical substitutions or oxidation reactions involving Methanol-D4 enable the tracing of deuterium through pools of metabolites or degradation products. Label transfer isn’t perfect in all conditions; acidic or basic media speed up H/D exchange, especially at the hydroxyl position, which makes careful control of pH and temperature a must. In some synthetic protocols, Methanol-D4 doubles as both solvent and nucleophile, installing deuterium in new molecules in a single step. This flexibility helps academic and commercial labs alike fine-tune molecules for everything from drug metabolism studies to tracing environmental pollutants.
Suppliers and researchers file Methanol-D4 under a handful of names, sometimes leading to confusion for those new to isotope chemistry. Common tags include “Deuterated Methanol,” “Methyl Alcohol-d4,” and “Methanol-2H4.” Catalogues also feature the formal IUPAC “Methanol-d4” to distinguish it from singly-labeled analogs. The CAS number (811-98-3) removes all ambiguity. Brands with a heavy focus on analytical chemistry, such as Sigma-Aldrich and Cambridge Isotope Laboratories, stick to the strict nomenclature and batch-assure every shipment. In my own experience, getting the right bottle proved crucial; one costly order gone wrong meant rerunning precious samples just to get a single, uncontaminated spectrum.
Methanol-D4 demands careful handling, much like its lighter relative. The toxicity levels align closely, with ingestion or inhalation risking central nervous system effects and possible organ damage. Most labs store deuterated methanol in tightly sealed containers, away from acids and oxidizers, and in clearly labeled flammables cabinets. I have watched colleagues don gloves, goggles, and keep waste segregated, as disposal routes differ from bulk alcohols due to regulatory tracking of deuterated materials. Smaller spills call for absorption with inert material and strict containment protocols; repeated exposure can dry skin or irritate the eyes, reminding even casual users that common sense should trump complacency. Local, state, and international guidelines set exposure limits and demand traceability from purchase to disposal — rules grow more stringent as volume and isotopic uniqueness increases, especially in regulated industries.
Methanol-D4 finds its true calling in the analytical sciences. Nuclear Magnetic Resonance (NMR) spectroscopy remains the number-one draw, with this solvent delivering sharp, shifted signals that don’t clutter up spectra. Chemists use it as a lock solvent and as a non-interfering background medium, even for tricky biomolecules or organometallic complexes. Mass spectrometry labs rely on deuterated standards to correct for variability in instrument response and recoveries, giving results a level of trustworthiness that unlabeled compounds simply lack. Pharmaceutical and biotech companies drive demand for isotopically labeled methanol in drug metabolism and pharmacokinetics, as tracing D4-allocation lets researchers unravel pathways and breakdown products. Environmental labs testing water or soil see Methanol-D4 as a tracer, helping track methanol breakdown and bioremediation roots. My time in a proteomics core facility gave me direct exposure to the unique clarity and confidence Methanol-D4 brings to sensitive, high-stakes analyses.
Methanol-D4 sparks innovation, especially where existing methods fall short on accuracy or resolution. NMR method developers push for even higher enrichment and for solvents with ultra-low water or acid content, knowing that every impurity reduces experimental certainty. Instrument manufacturers build specialized accessories just for deuterated solvents, reading subtle lock shifts and programming auto-replenish steps to guard against operator error. Scientists developing new isotopic labeling strategies or metabolic studies prize the purity and consistency needed for truly quantitative tracking, whether the goal is synthetic transformation, metabolic flux, or biomarker discovery. In my collaborations across physical and biological chemistry, I’ve seen how tightly-coupled the fate of deuterium can be to mechanism elucidation, structure proof, and regulatory submissions. Researchers also tinker with ways to drive down cost, streamlining exchange chemistries or automating recycling to get more runs per liter.
Over decades, toxicologists have compared deuterated methanol and its common cousin head-to-head. The substitution of deuterium for protium at near-complete levels does alter pharmacokinetics in some settings. Animal studies show that the acute and chronic toxicity profiles generally match standard methanol, with oral and inhalation routes both leading to nervous system symptoms and — at higher exposures — potentially fatal outcomes. Deuterium’s presence may slightly shift rates of metabolic oxidation, slowing the conversion to toxic formaldehyde and formic acid in vivo. This difference remains modest: researchers agree the safe-handling messages mirror those for regular methanol, avoiding ingestion and large-scale exposure above published limits. Regulatory bodies use the same frameworks for workplace monitoring and permissible exposure values, though the cost and scarcity of D4 methanol means most users encounter it in the limited space of research or industrial reference samples, not in bulk form or consumer products.
Methanol-D4 holds promise as analytical techniques and molecular design strategies become even more refined. The push for higher-throughput and sensitivity in NMR and mass spectrometry expects solvents with even tighter isotope ratios and purities. Synthetic biologists and metabolic engineers see opportunity in ever-more-sophisticated tracing — now sensitive enough to map single-cell flux and rare pathway events. As isotopic standards gain ground in carbon capture studies, atmospheric tracing, or green chemistry, demand for robust, cost-effective D4 methanol can only grow. Ongoing research focuses on reducing production costs, improving recycling workflows, and developing alternative synthetic methods that minimize environmental impact. Some pioneers experiment with microfluidic scaling, aiming to make high-purity deuterated solvents accessible well beyond the elite labs. As someone who has watched methods pivot from “good enough” to “flawless,” I expect Methanol-D4 to remain a central tool for proving chemical ideas, tracing biological mysteries, and meeting new scientific standards of proof.
Regular methanol shows up in everything from fuel additives to lab beakers. It’s a simple alcohol made from one carbon, four hydrogens, and an oxygen. Chemists know its formula as CH3OH. Straightforward stuff—flammable, toxic, and super useful for reactions and cleaning glassware. I couldn’t count the number of times I’ve used methanol to rinse out test tubes in university labs.
Methanol-D4 looks almost the same at first glance, but it swaps the hydrogens for something heavier: deuterium. Instead of the plain hydrogen atom, each D stands for deuterium—a hydrogen with an extra neutron. So Methanol-D4 is CD3OD. In rough terms, it’s molecularly “heavier,” which turns out to be a big deal for certain kinds of scientific analysis. The real shift comes from those four deuteriums hidden in the structure.
Someone unfamiliar with chemistry might see deuterium as a tiny detail, but swapping hydrogen for deuterium changes everything in advanced research. In nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy, these deuterium atoms barely show up in most scans. This gives scientists a cleaner look at the real sample instead of getting distracted by background noise from the solvent. As someone who learned the hard way, even tiny impurities in methanol can ruin a careful NMR run—methanol-D4 helps analysts focus on their compounds, not the “buzz” from stray protons.
That removal of distracting hydrogen signals helps chemists understand what’s happening in their experiments. A clear spectrum means the difference between confirming a tricky synthesis or having to repeat a week’s work. In industries where precision makes or breaks a product—think pharmaceuticals or advanced materials—methanol-D4 brings a level of certainty you won’t get with off-the-shelf methanol from the hardware store.
Methanol-D4 doesn’t come cheap. It takes specialized processes to swap out regular hydrogens for deuterium. The price often runs dozens of times higher per bottle compared to plain methanol. Early on, I remember watching the lab manager guard the methanol-D4 cabinet like it held gold. Nobody wants to watch precious solvent disappear down the drain from a careless rinse.
Safety also matters. Methanol-D4, just like its regular counterpart, remains a toxic substance. It can cause blindness or even death if ingested or improperly handled. Deuterium doesn’t change that fact—safe handling, fume hoods, and good habits always stay at the top of the checklist. Teaching safety alongside technique should be standard at every lab bench, because no experiment gets results if someone gets hurt.
For most people outside a research environment, methanol-D4 doesn’t turn up in daily life. Its value shines brightest in fields that rely on high-resolution imaging and scientific proof. Researchers analyzing new medicines or studying reaction pathways depend on solvents like this to push their work forward. Even a single drop can drive new discoveries or uncover errors.
For labs facing costs or shortages, looking into alternative suppliers, pooling resources, or rotating experiments might help reduce waste. Draining expensive deuterated solvents for simple cleaning runs against good practice. Creative scheduling and solid training can stretch supplies further, helping research budgets reach a little farther. In my experience, getting the team on the same page about careful use makes a real difference—waste less, discover more.
Methanol-D4 has carved out a place in labs for one clear reason—deuteration. Scientists swap out the hydrogen atoms in methanol for deuterium. This small change makes methanol-d4 one of those go-to solvents in nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy.
Years in research taught me how picky NMR can be with solvents. Signals from “regular” molecules can crowd out the ones we’re actually trying to see. Deuterated solvents like methanol-d4 cut down on that background noise and make spectra cleaner. Methanol-d4 dissolves a wide range of small molecules, so you can mix samples from pharmaceuticals, agricultural compounds, or food substances without much fuss.
Methanol-d4 isn’t only about dissolving chemicals. In proton NMR, it’s there to “stay quiet.” Deuterium atoms barely show up in proton NMR readings. Scientists get sharper, more readable results. On top of that, the signal from the deuterium provides a lock signal, which keeps the magnetic field stable during measurements. This means longer experiments without the data drifting or smearing.
Some folks use methanol-d4 for feeding studies and tracing. Marking compounds with deuterium helps track chemical changes inside cells, plants, or entire animals. I remember a project tracing metabolic pathways—we needed methanol’s methyl groups to see how plants handle environmental stressors.
Researchers also rely on methanol-d4 to prep standards for mass spectrometry. It helps with calibration, accuracy, and comparisons between experiments. Using these internal standards irons out small differences that creep in due to machinery or sample variation. That sort of accuracy matters, especially when someone’s medicine depends on a right answer.
Methanol-d4 isn’t stuck in just one lane. Chemists look for solvents that won’t react with their samples or mess up sensitive reactivity studies, especially with fragile catalysts. Methanol-d4 steps in for reactions where water or other solvents might ruin things. I’ve watched researchers run organometallic reactions that just won’t work with regular methanol—they use the deuterated form instead for more control and insight into what’s actually happening inside their flasks.
In physical chemistry, scientists sometimes investigate hydrogen bonding or molecular dynamics at a microscopic level. Methanol-d4 lets them follow the dance of deuterium atoms to tease out those secrets that regular methanol would obscure. By changing the mass and behavior of the hydrogen atoms, deuterated solvents reveal details about reaction energies and pathways. This is key knowledge for pushing science forward.
Managing a lab budget often forces tough choices. Deuterated solvents don’t come cheap, so sharing, recycling, or recovering these solvents helps stretch limited resources. Suppliers keep improving methods to make deuterated methanol safer and more affordable.
Supporting proper training makes a world of difference for anyone working with methanol-d4. Safety info shouldn’t collect dust on a shelf. Methanol—even the deuterated kind—brings exposure hazards. Labs need clear guidelines and fresh training for everyone from undergraduates to seasoned postdocs.
Getting used to methanol-d4 in research routines boils down to trust and collaboration—trusting the science, the purity of the chemical, and the shared experience in the lab community. Each new technique or project builds on this foundation, opening new directions and helping sharpen our understanding of the chemical world.
Methanol-D4, or deuterated methanol, finds its place in the lab for good reason. Four hydrogen atoms are swapped out for deuterium, an isotope of hydrogen that’s twice as heavy. This makes it highly effective for nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) experiments, especially in organic chemistry. NMR signals from the sample stand out, while those from ordinary hydrogen fade into the background, giving researchers a clearer view.
Purity isn’t just a technical number for a datasheet. Anything less than 99.8% chemical purity can throw off sensitive research and add confusion in interpreting spectra. Experience in an academic research lab showed me that any tiny impurity—maybe leftover solvents or water—can distort or mask important peaks, which derails days of careful work.
Chemists rely on high-grade solvents, especially when working with organometallic compounds or pharmaceuticals. Even trace amounts of ethanol or acetone mixed in methanol-D4 skew NMR results and send scientists down the wrong path. Most reputable suppliers guarantee a minimum of 99.8% chemical purity, but some push higher, often hitting 99.96%. These small margins make a big difference for people working close to the edge of what’s detectable.
Deuterium enrichment means stuffing as many of those heavier hydrogen atoms into each methanol molecule as possible. For methanol-D4, scientists aren’t satisfied with a random mix. They look for at least 99.5% of all methanol molecules to have deuterium where it belongs.
Lower enrichment leads to unwanted proton signals that muddy the spectrum and complicate the math behind quantifying reactions. In past projects, only an enrichment level above 99.8% truly delivered clean, distraction-free readings. When someone cuts corners on enrichment, those “invisible” protons come back to bite—they show up as noise or, worse, impersonate part of the sample.
Pharmaceutical chemists trust high-enrichment methanol-D4 when evaluating new drug structures, since a single stray proton can create confusion about a molecule’s makeup. Synthetic chemists lean on it for tracing reaction pathways or detecting unintended side-products.
Introducing low-purity or low-enrichment methanol-D4 leads to more than blurry graphs. It wastes money, burns time, and kills momentum. In quality assurance labs, anything less than top-tier solvent can trigger false positives or negatives. Regulators and auditors now expect labs to log every bottle’s purity and isotopic credentials.
Some sources pin the reliability of research on wide adoption of certificates of analysis. No one wants to throw away an entire run of experiments for skipping this simple check.
Vet every supplier for full certificates that spell out both chemical purity and deuterium enrichment to the nearest tenth of a percent. Store methanol-D4 to keep out moisture, air, and sunlight—deuterated solvents break down if ignored. Trust but verify: run a simple NMR of the solvent itself before starting high-stakes synthesis or analysis.
Long-term, labs save money and hassle by making high quality the default for critical solvents like methanol-D4. The daily grind of research gets smoother, errors drop, and confidence in published results goes up.
Methanol-D4 is a strong solvent, quite common in many labs, but not nearly as harmless as water or salt. I’ve seen fresh-out-of-college researchers surprised by just how subtle its fumes can be—until they walk out of the lab with a headache or find their hands irritated the next day. Methanol-D4 isn’t toxic just because of what’s in textbooks, it gives real-world consequences fast. It burns, vaporizes, and soaks right in, risking nerves, vision, and a whole lot more. A stuffy or cramped lab, poor seals on containers, or sloppy habits raise the odds of injury for any worker, not just those new to the field.
From personal workbench headaches to hospital visits, I’ve seen what happens when chemicals go unlabeled or end up on the wrong shelf. Methanol-D4 has a flash point that’s shockingly low, and even a warm storeroom can lead to vapor buildup. Flammable cabinet storage makes a big difference. Metal or thick plastic containers with airtight seals hold up long-term. Glass bottles, if used, should be kept in secondary containment—think shatterproof trays or bins—especially if stored above waist height. Never mix Methanol-D4 with acids, oxidizers, or bases. Vapors spread. Don’t count on luck: opening a door to a warm storeroom and setting off an alarm is a sure way to remember proper storage forever.
Chemists and technicians get busy, sometimes forgetful. Nitrile gloves, splash goggles, and a full lab coat catch most emergency room stories before they start. On one project, we measured vapor levels outside the fume hood and found the air in nearby corridors—yes, outside the hood—spiked after just a half hour of unattended work. Proper hoods, ventilation, and not working alone can make all the difference. Don’t trust a nose to tell you Methanol-D4 is in the air either; it sneaks up on people and the damage comes quick. Even brief contact with skin or eyes leads to burns and injuries. Washing up with plain old soap and water—right away—beats any fancy “chemical neutralizing” sprays I’ve run across.
Every workplace deserves honest training, not just another quiz on a website. I remember labs where even senior staff struggled to find the nearest eyewash. A real emergency plan should never gather dust in a filing cabinet. Keep spill kits stocked and visible. Use clear, simple spill response steps: evacuate if needed, ventilate first, suit up before cleanup, and neutralize only with approved spill materials. Post important numbers (emergency, poison control) near storage areas. Review these routines with new hires, not just during orientation but on a rolling basis. Building strong habits takes repetition, not a PowerPoint slide.
Handling dangerous chemicals never becomes “routine” if safety leads the way. Methanol-D4 isn’t just a technical risk; it’s a human risk. From sharing lessons learned to upgrading fume hoods that actually vent well, it’s about people in the room, not just numbers on an SDS sheet. Experienced hands spot and fix problems faster, but everyone benefits from simple, visible reminders of what’s at stake. True safety grows out of transparency, honest learning, and refusing to cut corners, no matter how busy the lab gets or how routine the experiment seems.
Methanol-D4 shows up in research labs quite often, mainly serving as a solvent in NMR spectroscopy and other analytical methods. Its appeal comes from the deuterium atoms, which help scientists see compounds more clearly. But this chemical is not something to take lightly in day-to-day handling—its structure might seem simple, but the risks sit right beneath the surface.
I’ve spent time in labs where chemical safety can feel like an afterthought until a near-miss shakes everyone up. Methanol-D4 acts a lot like regular methanol, but the deuterium doesn't make it safer. Breathing in its vapors or letting it splash on skin creates the risk of poisoning, headache, nausea, and in large amounts, even blindness or death. Deuterated methanol travels through the body and acts as a nervous system depressant. Most folks only need a quick glance at case reports from poison control to see how little room there is for error.
This chemical lights up easily. Fumes can catch fire from a distant spark, so storing and pouring need real attention. In one lab experience, a colleague’s careless transfer near a hot plate almost cost us a serious fire. Methanol flames stay invisible in daylight, which adds to the danger. Inhaling too much or spilling on skin seems less dramatic than a fire, but the damage to health builds up fast—many don’t even realize until symptoms hit.
Long-term exposure can sneak up, too. Methanol metabolites hurt the optic nerve and the brain. Handling it without gloves or proper ventilation stacks up risk for everyone in the workspace. Even if accidents seem minor in the moment, building the wrong habits opens the door for bigger problems down the road.
Real safety demands action, not just rules on paper. Splash goggles and nitrile gloves never feel optional with Methanol-D4. Some labs treat splash goggles like overkill, but regular safety glasses don’t offer enough protection. Double-checking that lab coats, especially cuffs, fit tightly means spills roll off instead of soaking through.
Strong fume hoods save lungs and nerves. Every time I see someone leaning inside a closed hood, it’s a reminder how quickly vapor builds up. Methanol-D4 doesn't carry a strong warning odor; the harm hits before you realize it's present. Routine use of a fume hood, even during simple dilution, sets a safer rhythm for everyone working nearby.
Never storing this chemical near oxidizers or acids stops bigger emergencies. The fire hazard came home to me one winter, when a poorly labeled flask ended up in a refrigerated cabinet with hydrochloric acid. Emergency procedures left out thorough inventory checks, so the mix sat undetected for hours—a quiet risk waiting to turn explosive.
Training and reminders can feel repetitive, but they matter most with quiet dangers like Methanol-D4. Sharing close calls and lessons with the whole team helps build awareness before something serious happens. Calibrating spill kits and ensuring eyewash stations work reduces the risk of a small mishap turning into permanent injury. Peer pressure in the lab, when it encourages safety, can feel like the strongest barrier against carelessness.
No single piece of gear or sign makes a lab safe with Methanol-D4 around. Respect for the chemical, clear protocols, and consistent, everyday habits decide what happens between accidents and a safe shift’s end. From my own work and near-misses, keeping one step ahead means asking more questions and choosing caution—every single time.
| Names | |
| Preferred IUPAC name | Tetradeuteriomethanol |
| Other names |
Deuterated methanol Methanol-d4 (CD3OD) Methyl-d4 alcohol Tetra-deuteromethanol |
| Pronunciation | /mɛˈθæn.ɒl diː fɔː/ |
| Identifiers | |
| CAS Number | 811-98-3 |
| 3D model (JSmol) | `3D model (JSmol) string` for Methanol-D4: `[2H]O[13CH3]` |
| Beilstein Reference | 1718736 |
| ChEBI | CHEBI:76957 |
| ChEMBL | CHEMBL18724 |
| ChemSpider | 122022 |
| DrugBank | DB14297 |
| ECHA InfoCard | 03b7a2d9-886c-449f-a6e4-02b7ca9e074a |
| EC Number | 200-659-6 |
| Gmelin Reference | 7851 |
| KEGG | C01332 |
| MeSH | D001335 |
| PubChem CID | 81235 |
| RTECS number | PY8450000 |
| UNII | 4Y8F71U98L |
| UN number | 1230 |
| CompTox Dashboard (EPA) | 37QJ5L5TS5 |
| Properties | |
| Chemical formula | CD4O |
| Molar mass | 32.06 g/mol |
| Appearance | Clear, colorless liquid |
| Odor | Odorless |
| Density | 0.867 g/mL at 25 °C (lit.) |
| Solubility in water | miscible |
| log P | -0.77 |
| Vapor pressure | 128 mmHg (20 °C) |
| Acidity (pKa) | 15.5 |
| Basicity (pKb) | 15.5 |
| Magnetic susceptibility (χ) | −6.5 × 10⁻⁶ cm³/mol |
| Refractive index (nD) | 1.328 |
| Viscosity | Viscosity: 0.544 mPa·s (20 °C) |
| Dipole moment | 1.70 D |
| Thermochemistry | |
| Std molar entropy (S⦵298) | 126.6 J·mol⁻¹·K⁻¹ |
| Std enthalpy of formation (ΔfH⦵298) | -205.0 kJ mol-1 |
| Std enthalpy of combustion (ΔcH⦵298) | -770.4 kJ mol-1 |
| Pharmacology | |
| ATC code | V03AB72 |
| Hazards | |
| GHS labelling | GHS02, GHS06 |
| Pictograms | GHS02, GHS06 |
| Signal word | Danger |
| Hazard statements | H225, H301, H311, H331, H370 |
| Precautionary statements | P210, P233, P240, P241, P242, P243, P261, P271, P280, P301+P310, P303+P361+P353, P304+P340, P311, P312, P337+P313, P403+P235, P501 |
| NFPA 704 (fire diamond) | 1-3-1 |
| Flash point | 6 °C |
| Autoignition temperature | 464 °C |
| Explosive limits | LEL: 6% ; UEL: 36% |
| Lethal dose or concentration | LD50 Oral Rat 5628 mg/kg |
| LD50 (median dose) | LD50 (median dose): Oral, rat: 5.6 g/kg |
| NIOSH | PC1400000 |
| PEL (Permissible) | 200 ppm |
| REL (Recommended) | 50 ppm |
| IDLH (Immediate danger) | 6000 ppm |
| Related compounds | |
| Related compounds |
Ethanol-D6 Acetonitrile-D3 Chloroform-D DMSO-D6 Water-D2 |