© 2026 Nanjing Finechem Holdings Co., Ltd,
All Right Reserved
F.A.M.E. MIX came out of a need for better, cleaner alternatives to standard diesel fuel. Back in the late 20th century, rising oil prices and growing concerns about air pollution sparked research in bio-based fuels. Researchers dug into vegetable oils and animal fats as feedstocks. Through years of trial and error, they ended up with a mixture of fatty acid methyl esters, now called F.A.M.E., that could run in existing diesel engines. Governments and innovators recognized that F.A.M.E. offered a way to both recycle agricultural by-products and lower greenhouse gas emissions. European regulations, more than anything, jumpstarted its adoption. Today, F.A.M.E. MIX serves as a backbone for biodiesel use across the world. My industry contacts say—environmental performance and domestic feedstock versatility keep it relevant despite ongoing debate about food versus fuel priorities.
F.A.M.E. MIX includes methyl esters produced by transesterification of renewable fats and oils. Producers rely on feedstocks ranging from rapeseed oil in Europe to soybeans in the Americas, sometimes mixing animal fats or used cooking oil. Each batch might differ in its precise make-up, but the goal is always a product that meets established fuel standards, especially EN 14214 in Europe and ASTM D6751 in North America. In the field, drivers and operators see F.A.M.E. as a drop-in biofuel for diesel vehicles. Logistics managers appreciate the local supply chains and the reduction in carbon intensity claims on today’s scorecards. These realities matter more than just numbers on lab sheets; they drive the push to blend F.A.M.E. with mineral diesel on a regular basis.
Ask a chemist and they’ll tell you, F.A.M.E. MIX tends toward pale yellow, sometimes with a green or brown tint depending on the feedstock. At room temperature, it pours like mineral diesel, but its higher viscosity shows up on cold mornings—as anyone who’s had to start a truck in northern climates can confirm. Chemically, the main story involves its structure: long-chain fatty acids joined to simple methyl groups. Compared to petroleum diesel, it holds more oxygen, which leads to cleaner combustion but can also boost water absorption. With a boiling point range often exceeding 300°C, it stays stable in most operational settings. Yet it’s sensitive to oxidation and might form gums over time if improperly stored. Flashpoint rests comfortably above that of mineral diesel, giving it a safety edge at the pump and in storage yards. These features stem directly from its renewable origins.
F.A.M.E. MIX doesn’t meet the mark unless it matches tough technical specs. If a product wants to call itself biodiesel under EN 14214 or ASTM D6751, things like ester content, water levels, acid number, and cetane value all matter. Typically, F.A.M.E. needs at least 96.5% ester content and must stay under 0.02% water. Free glycerin and trace metals need tight control since even small buildups can hurt engine components. Labels must spell this out clearly, showing both blend percentage (like B7 for 7% biodiesel) and key values for end users and fuel inspectors. Labels also flag storage guidance, reflecting F.A.M.E.’s sensitivity to moisture and light. I’ve heard from operators who had storage tanks foul up when ignoring these warnings, highlighting the real need for proper labeling and awareness.
The transesterification process makes F.A.M.E. possible. Producers start with vegetable oils or animal fats and react them with methanol or sometimes ethanol in the presence of a catalyst, usually sodium or potassium hydroxide. The process splits off glycerol and leaves behind methyl esters and a few minor by-products. Reaction conditions, like temperature and agitation, must stay steady for the best yield—usually above 90%. Any water or free fatty acids in the raw material can gum up the works, so most outfits filter and dry oils carefully before starting. Once the reaction wraps, crude F.A.M.E. gets washed and filtered to remove excess methanol, catalyst, and soap. It may then undergo further polishing steps before reaching compliance-grade quality. This chemical dance turns oils destined for the waste stream into low-carbon energy—and it happens at scales ranging from backyard garages to sprawling biorefineries.
Most F.A.M.E. production sticks with the basic transesterification route, but labs and refineries keep tinkering. Some modify F.A.M.E. post-production to reduce its cold filter plugging point (CFPP) or to boost resistance to oxidation. In some places, researchers swap in specialty alcohols like butanol to produce alternative esters, hoping to dodge certain regulatory hurdles or open up new engine compatibilities. Additives often hit the mix to guard against microbial growth, water absorption, or to improve lubricity. Oxidative stability enhancers and cloud point depressants show up more in colder climates or long-haul logistics setups. Newer work aims to use less methanol, instead drawing on greener alcohols to shrink the carbon footprint even further. These tweaks not only answer industry needs, but they also reveal how rapidly the field adapts to regulatory and technical feedback.
Across different regions and industries, F.A.M.E. MIX sometimes goes by various names. In most technical circles, you’ll hear “Fatty Acid Methyl Ester” or just “Biodiesel.” Certain suppliers brand their variations with names hinting at origin, like “Rapeseed Methyl Ester” (RME), “Soy Methyl Ester” (SME), or “Palm Methyl Ester” (PME). In documentation and safety data sheets, the synonyms proliferate—methyl soyate, methyl rapate, and methyl tallowate crop up depending on feedstock. In regulatory filings and trade, the broader “F.A.M.E.” label offers clarity. I’ve run into confusion on import/export paperwork where F.A.M.E., methyl esters, and biodiesel were all treated as separate, only for staff to sort things out later. Pushing for unified terminology helps analysts, truckers, and customs officers keep things straight, reducing costly errors.
No product leaves the plant floor without tight safety and operational standards. F.A.M.E. MIX stands out for being less toxic and far less flammable than standard diesel. Its high flashpoint (typically over 130°C) drops risk in handling and transport. Still, F.A.M.E. can draw in water from the air, increasing the likelihood of microbial growth in storage tanks. Over time, this can lead to clogged filters or internal tank corrosion. Good practice means frequent tank checks, regular draining, applying biocides when appropriate, and keeping tanks as full as possible to limit condensation. Workers handling raw F.A.M.E. should wear basic PPE, though day-to-day risks are relatively low compared to many other fuels or chemicals. Lessons from operators stress keeping an eye on fuel filters and injector maintenance to avoid surprises once vehicles run consistently on higher F.A.M.E. blends.
F.A.M.E. MIX’s world spans far past truck fleets or city buses. Heavy construction—where diesel engines dominate—finds a willing companion in F.A.M.E. blends. The same goes for agricultural equipment, marine vessels in certain coastal nations, and even niche power generation. Power plants sometimes blend F.A.M.E. with heating oil both to comply with emission targets and to manage rising fuel costs. There are reports of local governments leveraging F.A.M.E. to hit renewable energy targets, issuing procurement contracts favoring higher blends. It pops up in industrial cleaners and solvents thanks to its biodegradability. Some niche uses involve F.A.M.E. in metalworking fluids or as a base for specialty lubricants, showing the range outside pure fuel. Each of these sectors faces distinct challenges—from cold flow limits in arctic environments to water management in tropical ones—and real life has hammered home that no single blend solves every challenge. Local context, infrastructure, and operator habits shape F.A.M.E. uptake more than any lab result.
Labs never stop chasing better F.A.M.E., looking to drive down costs, improve cold weather performance, and broaden feedstock supply. Feedstock flexibility matters—researchers test everything from municipal waste oils to algae and genetically-engineered crops. Modern R&D teams push advances in enzymatic catalysis, hoping to slash energy demands and open up less refined inputs. Collaborations with auto makers zero in on fuel system compatibility, since new engine designs respond differently to high-oxygen fuels. Advanced sensors now monitor F.A.M.E. blend quality in storage and trucks, flagging potential oxidation before fouling engines. Pilot projects in small towns or university fleets yield first-hand performance data, tweaking mix designs for local needs. In labs and on roads, data shows that ongoing research matters—evidence of lower particulate emissions or improved local air quality has come directly from these initiatives.
Compared to traditional diesel, F.A.M.E. MIX brings a friendlier profile in acute toxicity and chronic environmental effects. Studies show that in a controlled spill, F.A.M.E. breaks down in soil within weeks and poses little threat to aquatic life after dilution and weathering. Workers exposed to neat F.A.M.E. report low irritation rates, and inhalation risks stay minimal thanks to the high boiling point. Field studies measuring exhaust from engines running high blends of F.A.M.E. point to sharp drops in particulate matter and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, both serious health hazards. At the same time, some work raises worries about aldehyde emissions and unregulated trace compounds. Regulators keep adjusting exposure guidelines as new toxicological data comes in. For anyone storing or using F.A.M.E., the focus remains on handling basics—avoid skin contact in raw form and prevent long-term inhalation during blending or additive mixing. Evidence from peer-reviewed studies underpins both regulatory shifts and best practices for users.
The future for F.A.M.E. MIX sits at a crossroads shaped by policy, technology, and sheer market pressure. As governments ramp up carbon reduction commitments, biofuels—including F.A.M.E.—will stay on the table, either as a stand-alone or as a serious blend partner. Evolving renewable fuel standards already nudge fuel companies to adopt flexible supply models, where local F.A.M.E. production meets tailored blending targets. The next generation of F.A.M.E. technology may lower cold flow challenges and bring new sources into play, like waste cooking oil or purpose-bred energy crops. Electrification and hydrogen loom in the headlines, but high-inertia sectors, such as shipping, aviation (with advanced esters), and heavy equipment, still need solutions where drop-in molecules rule. Industry voices expect continued improvement in regulatory certainty and feedstock supply chains, boosted by improved waste collection and smarter transesterification. The transition will take more than new reactors or better catalysts; trust, shared field experience, and real-world proof will shape F.A.M.E.’s standing for decades.
Most folks hear about F.A.M.E. MIX as a fuel term tossed around in trucking circles or biofuel reports. F.A.M.E. stands for Fatty Acid Methyl Esters. This stuff doesn’t just show up in chemistry books—it shows up at gas stations and in the engines of everyday trucking fleets.
F.A.M.E. MIX appears wherever people need biodiesel. You’ll find it blended with regular diesel to lower overall carbon emissions. Unlike straight petroleum diesel, F.A.M.E. is made by reacting vegetable oils or animal fats with methanol. That change gives it different properties, and it lets engines run cleaner. Truck drivers hauling produce or families filling up home heating tanks benefit from those lower emissions.
Manuals from European diesel engine makers often refer to F.A.M.E.-based blends. Blending F.A.M.E. with petroleum diesel helps meet strict standards for fuel composition and pollution in places like Germany and Scandinavia, where politicians and regulators keep a close eye on what comes out of a vehicle’s tailpipe.
I spent a winter in a farm town surrounded by tractors and 18-wheelers. Folks there notice the difference in exhaust smell when biodiesel blends go in the tank. It’s less sooty. After seasons of running straight petroleum diesel, switching to blends with F.A.M.E. MIX lowered the grime caked on engine parts. Mechanic bills dropped. Local lakes saw clearer water because fewer fuel spills meant fewer slicks of heavy oil.
Research backs up those small-town observations. Studies from the U.S. Department of Energy show emissions of particulate matter and greenhouse gases drop when F.A.M.E. is blended into fuel. The industry pushes these mixes to meet targets mandated under things like the Renewable Energy Directive. In daily life, that translates into cleaner air outside schools and neighborhoods.
Problems crop up, too. F.A.M.E. pulls water from the air. If fuel sits too long in the tank, you get water contamination. Owners of diesel cars have discovered gelled fuel during cold snaps, especially when using F.A.M.E.-heavy diesel. In those months, clogged filters and stalled trucks show up more often at repair shops. Small operators sometimes pay out of pocket for additives to fight gelling, sapping some of the cost advantage.
Old gaskets and seals made for straight petroleum fuel don’t always get along with F.A.M.E. over time. There’s a risk of rubber parts swelling or going brittle. Drivers and mechanics swap out parts to avoid leaks or breakdowns. Biodiesel distributors share reminders about proper storage, rotation, and winter blends to minimize trouble.
Researchers have started developing additives to help F.A.M.E. perform better in winter. More fuel depots mix just enough regular diesel in with F.A.M.E. to lower the risk of cold clogs. Standard-setting groups, like ASTM International, publish new guidelines each year to keep up with demands from equipment makers and drivers. Neighborhood co-ops band together to buy high-quality F.A.M.E. blends that clients can trust, keeping more money in local pockets and air cleaner at the same time.
F.A.M.E. MIX shows up in labs and factories working with biodiesel, and it’s no accident. It carries a reputation for its role in blending fatty acid methyl esters, a vital matter in renewable fuel production. The acronym might sound technical, but what folks really look for is a clean, consistent fuel source. Folks in agriculture, trucking, and fuel retail count on a process that won’t waste time or money. F.A.M.E. MIX fills that gap, helping blend different oil stocks—say soybean with canola, or recycled grease—into a usable biodiesel. If you drive a diesel car, run farm equipment, or deliver groceries, that’s what helps keep engines humming cleaner and quieter.
Back in my own years following up on fuel supplies for a delivery co-op, nothing caused more concern than clogged lines or unpredictable fuel performance. It usually boiled down to the way the biodiesel had been mixed. If you take short-cuts there, problems pile up later. With F.A.M.E. MIX, a batch comes together smoother and the quality, in my experience, shows up at the pump.
Anyone handling F.A.M.E. MIX runs through a checklist that’s about safety and getting each step right. Gloves, masks, and good ventilation take care of the human part. Temperature control does much of the rest, since differences in oils get harder to handle if the mix is too hot or cold. For most setups, heating tanks to 50-60°C works. Start with a careful pour—measure each ingredient, since eyeballing fuels can lead to surprises down the road. A tank with a paddle or propeller mixer speeds things up and keeps the blend from settling into separate layers. If your shop goes big, automatic pumps handle the dosing and stirring on a timer.
I’ve seen small producers skip regular cleaning, and leftover residue from past batches can contaminate new fuel. That’s a shortcut that always leads to extra headaches, so regular washdowns with mild detergent and water between runs keep quality on point. Watching for leaks or cracks in hoses and tanks makes a difference—one unnoticed flaw may ruin thousands of liters.
After mixing, sample the result and run a basic clarity and water content check. Even in modern workshops, a clear glass jar and a sunny window do the job—if you spot cloudiness or streaks, something’s off. For extra certainty, send samples for lab analysis: things like acid value and viscosity matter if you want engines to last. The fuel should meet standards like EN 14214 or ASTM D6751. Check with your supplier for the latest spec sheet; regulations keep shifting as science marches forward.
Problems crop up sometimes—a batch gels early, or there’s a fuel filter blockage. That’s a nudge to look closer at feedstock quality. Contaminated or high-moisture inputs signal trouble ahead. Regular record-keeping—each tank, blend ratio, temperature, supplier—lets you backtrack and spot issues before they repeat. Simple logbooks, digital or paper, save costs in the long run by helping find past patterns.
Solid training for staff, dependable equipment, and ongoing documentation turn F.A.M.E. MIX into a day-to-day tool rather than a gamble. Long-term, good practice translates to cleaner air, more reliable machinery, and fewer lost hours. Biodiesel won’t fix every fuel problem, but handled right, it offers one clear step in the direction of better, more responsible energy use.
People often see F.A.M.E. MIX show up in product ingredient lists and wonder exactly what’s inside. Reading through opaque names doesn’t make things clear. F.A.M.E. stands for Fatty Acid Methyl Esters, which comes from natural sources like vegetable oils and animal fats. Biodiesel manufacturers use these as alternatives to traditional diesel, and cleaning product companies use them to break down grease.
Most of the time, F.A.M.E. MIX features methyl esters of fatty acids that come from oils like soybean, palm, or rapeseed (canola). These oils don’t need to go through deep chemistry labs; they’re regular crops grown in huge amounts, pressed for oil, and processed into esters. The key ingredients usually include methyl oleate, methyl palmitate, methyl stearate, and methyl linoleate. Sometimes, the mix leans heavy on one particular ester, depending on the source oil. For example, biodiesel coming out of soybean oil contains lots of methyl linoleate, while palm oil versions give you more methyl palmitate.
Most people don’t want—or need—to keep up with technical words. Here’s the honest truth: these compounds simply come from common fats and oils that get a dose of methanol. That swap of parts in the chemistry lab turns thick oil into a thinner, cleaner-burning liquid, which is the key transformation for both transport fuels and formulated cleaners.
Looking closer, you’ll find that nearly all F.A.M.E. MIX batches include small amounts of leftover methanol, some harmless mineral salts, maybe traces of natural waxes, and water. The legal limit for leftover methanol in finished biodiesel is very low, but industrial mixes might have a bit more, if they’re not made for vehicles. So, it’s not just one perfectly pure chemical; it’s a blend of various methyl esters, plus tiny amounts of by-products.
A product’s source and blend directly affect how it performs—whether you’re fueling trucks or cleaning machinery. Pure methyl esters burn cleaner than fossil-based diesel, leading to much lower sulfur emissions, which means you’re breathing in less of the bad stuff. From personal experience in manufacturing, switching to F.A.M.E.-based degreasers cut our hazardous waste bills in half. Crews appreciated not breathing in harsh vapors. Farms who use biodiesel sourced from local rapeseed oil get better cold weather performance compared to tropical-sourced palm blends that can gunk up in winter.
The subject of F.A.M.E. MIX brings up important points about sustainability. Customers ask: is it really greener? The reality: producing F.A.M.E. mixes lessens reliance on petroleum, and the source crops absorb carbon while growing. Not every F.A.M.E. mix earns a gold star—plantation palm oil raises environmental concerns, while used cooking oil recycled into fuel dodges lots of land and deforestation issues. Insisting on clear supply chains and certifications goes a long way toward making sure what you use does less damage to the planet.
Folks deserve to know whether their cleaning fluid or fuel tank holds F.A.M.E. methyl esters from renewable, responsibly-grown sources. Simple ingredient transparency helps. Makers could move toward better on-label details—for instance, showing a breakdown of ester types, plus stating oil origins. The know-how exists, it just takes motivation from customers and businesses to ask for it. For buyers who want to cut their oil use and emissions, picking F.A.M.E. blends from certified sustainable crops or waste oils stands above the rest.
Opening the F.A.M.E. MIX ingredient list gives regular people the power to make informed calls about everything from farm fuel to dish soap. Building on facts, cutting confusion, and sticking with straightforward details brings real progress, both for the health of workers and for the planet.
F.A.M.E. MIX — or Fatty Acid Methyl Esters Mix — gets plenty of attention in labs, especially in the biodiesel and biofuel sector, plus food and agricultural testing. The product name pops up in research articles and among professionals eager for cleaner energy alternatives. For years, researchers have dug into the details of how this mixture works and how it impacts people or the environment.
The talk about side effects starts with contact. Most F.A.M.E. products are chemical liquids that can irritate the skin or eyes. Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) safety sheets list dryness, redness, and stinging when these chemicals hit exposed skin or eyes. If inhaled, F.A.M.E. vapors can cause mild throat or lung irritation, often reported as coughing, sneezing, or an itchy throat among technicians after long hours in the lab.
Chronic exposure to vapors, especially inside poorly ventilated spaces, raises concerns. Studies show that organic solvents, such as methyl esters, may contribute to headaches or feelings of dizziness for lab and factory workers. Chemical manufacturers point out the importance of gloves, goggles, and extractor fans, but accidents happen, even with strict laboratory habits. Short-term, these side effects usually fade after fresh air and washing up. Sometimes, oversights in safety cause lingering discomfort; anyone around chemicals for long stretches knows the risks add up.
Swallowing F.A.M.E. MIX—by accident or through contaminated hands—is rare but not impossible, especially outside professional environments. Swallowing this chemical blend often leaves someone feeling nauseous or gives them a stomach ache. Larger doses may prompt vomiting, diarrhea, or in severe cases, more serious metabolic problems. While not as acutely toxic as some solvents, no one wants to put their health to the test in this way.
Wastewater from plants and labs using F.A.M.E. chemicals can have environmental consequences if not managed right. The breakdown process of F.A.M.E.s varies. Toxins can leach into soil or water supplies, impacting aquatic life or plants nearby. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) rules set standards for disposing of chemical waste, but not every site hits the mark. In my experience, some laboratories run ahead with responsible waste management, while smaller outfits sometimes cut corners, risking more than just a slap on the wrist.
Simple steps keep most people safe from the majority of side effects. Basic safety training for anyone handling F.A.M.E. MIX, plus regular refreshers, can cut incidents. Wearing gloves, eye gear, and working under a fume hood protect workers, while proper disposal bins prevent environmental mishaps.
Companies and universities that monitor air quality and provide workers with the right gear see lower reports of symptoms. I’ve worked in both well-run and underfunded labs; the difference in safety culture shows up in staff health. Keeping clear rules and real enforcement makes a bigger difference than any poster on the wall.
Access to medical advice is critical if someone feels sick after exposure. Quick response can reduce the impact and help pinpoint weak spots in lab procedures. Chemical hygiene officers and supervisors must hear about near-misses, not just injuries, to keep improving conditions.
F.A.M.E. MIX shares similar risks with other organic chemicals: skin irritation, potential breathing issues, and environmental hazards if accidents go unchecked. Many safety measures have become easier to manage with modern equipment and better training, but there’s always a push to do more, especially as these chemicals find wider use. Improving open reporting and enforcing smarter disposal can limit unwanted side effects for both workers and communities down the line.
If you’re dialed into the world of alternative fuels or industrial chemistry, F.A.M.E. MIX probably sounds familiar. It’s a blend of fatty acid methyl esters, often sourced from renewable oils like soy or rapeseed. Many know it as a core component in biodiesel—used in trucks, buses, and farms looking for a cleaner burn compared to petroleum diesel.
Accessibility makes a difference here. F.A.M.E. helps bridge the gap for businesses leaning away from fossil fuels. Reliable, environmentally-friendly fuels offer hope for cutting greenhouse gas emissions. Studies show using F.A.M.E.-based biodiesel can drop carbon dioxide emissions by over 60% when compared to standard diesel. This isn’t just theory: cities and logistics companies have started switching large fleets over to fuels blended with F.A.M.E. for this reason.
You won’t spot F.A.M.E. MIX lined up on store shelves like motor oil, but you can source it directly through chemical suppliers and specialty fuel providers. Large distributors such as BASF or Cargill ship bulk quantities. Many regional agricultural suppliers have begun carrying F.A.M.E. products as demand for sustainable energy builds up. Try reaching out to distributors focused on green fuel or renewable energy. Their catalogues often list F.A.M.E. blends on offer.
For businesses or research institutions, direct contact with a supplier usually works best. These companies offer safety data, shipment options, and quality guarantees. Those of us working in industry have learned to rely on the trustworthiness of suppliers who comply with certifications or ISO standards—questions about source material, handling practices, or storage stability can make all the difference in a project’s success.
Local regulations might shape where F.A.M.E. can be purchased. In many countries, blending mandates require a certain level of biofuel content in diesel sold at public pumps, so major fuel distribution points (think truck stops and commercial fuel depots) sometimes carry F.A.M.E. blends too, though rarely marketed under the chemical name.
F.A.M.E. isn’t just ‘fuel in, fuel out.’ Its composition and quality play a big role. Before buying, ask for a certificate of analysis or product specification sheet. Water content, purity, and origin matter if you’re using large volumes or operating sensitive machinery. Poor-quality blends lead to clogged filters or engine issues. Experienced buyers look for suppliers with a clear record of quality control and transparency.
For smaller quantities, online specialty chemical stores sometimes cater to hobbyists, small-scale manufacturers, or researchers. Make sure the retailer welcomes questions and provides credible information. When I’ve needed small amounts for lab experiments, direct chats with suppliers over phone or email helped clarify specifications better than any online listing.
F.A.M.E. MIX represents one piece of the global push for cleaner energy. Clear communication between buyers and suppliers helps keep projects running smoothly, whether you’re fueling a fleet or running tests in a lab. By leaning into local expertise, regulatory knowledge, and product transparency, anyone sourcing F.A.M.E. can make better choices for their operations and for the environment.
| Names | |
| Preferred IUPAC name | Fatty acid methyl esters |
| Other names |
FAME Mix Fatty Acid Methyl Esters Mix |
| Pronunciation | /ˈeɪ.faɪˈɛm.iː mɪks/ |
| Identifiers | |
| CAS Number | 67762-38-3 |
| Beilstein Reference | 1721304 |
| ChEBI | CHEBI:60153 |
| ChEMBL | CHEMBL4290322 |
| ChemSpider | 21409265 |
| DrugBank | DB14165 |
| ECHA InfoCard | 03a1ed2c-1621-43e1-af3f-8d159cdbd059 |
| EC Number | 111-43-3 |
| Gmelin Reference | 606941 |
| KEGG | C14833 |
| MeSH | phytotherapy |
| PubChem CID | 6898985 |
| RTECS number | ZHHRD2E5L5 |
| UNII | 58F84TUR3O |
| UN number | “UN 3475” |
| CompTox Dashboard (EPA) | DTXSID4021959 |
| Properties | |
| Chemical formula | C19H34O2, C17H32O2, C15H30O2, C17H34O2 |
| Molar mass | 284.5 g/mol |
| Appearance | Bright yellow powder |
| Odor | fruity, characteristic |
| Density | 0.900 g/cm3 |
| Solubility in water | Insoluble |
| log P | 5.2 |
| Vapor pressure | <0.1 mmHg @ 20°C |
| Acidity (pKa) | 19.57 |
| Basicity (pKb) | 12.9 |
| Magnetic susceptibility (χ) | @ 20°C: 0.99990 |
| Refractive index (nD) | 1.4500 |
| Viscosity | 260 mm²/s |
| Dipole moment | 3.59 D |
| Thermochemistry | |
| Std molar entropy (S⦵298) | 293.4 J·mol⁻¹·K⁻¹ |
| Std enthalpy of formation (ΔfH⦵298) | -748.5 kJ/mol |
| Std enthalpy of combustion (ΔcH⦵298) | -37.4 MJ/kg |
| Pharmacology | |
| ATC code | A11JB |
| Hazards | |
| Main hazards | May cause cancer. May cause genetic defects. |
| GHS labelling | GHS02, GHS07 |
| Pictograms | SGH/07, SGH/09, GHS09 |
| Signal word | Warning |
| Hazard statements | H302, H315, H317, H319, H411 |
| Precautionary statements | Keep out of reach of children. If medical advice is needed, have product container or label at hand. Read label before use. |
| NFPA 704 (fire diamond) | 2-1-0 |
| Flash point | > 170 °C |
| Autoignition temperature | > 340 °C |
| Explosive limits | 0.7 - 5.0 % |
| Lethal dose or concentration | LD50 (oral, rat): > 5000 mg/kg |
| LD50 (median dose) | LD50 (median dose): >2000 mg/kg (rat) |
| NIOSH | TC-19C-373 |
| PEL (Permissible) | PEL (Permissible): Not established |
| REL (Recommended) | 351.50 |
| IDLH (Immediate danger) | Not established |
| Related compounds | |
| Related compounds |
Fatty acid methyl ester Methyl oleate Methyl linoleate Methyl palmitate Methyl stearate |
