© 2026 Nanjing Finechem Holdings Co., Ltd,
All Right Reserved
Cell culture has always pushed for better and cleaner results, especially in fields like biomanufacturing. Before products like EX-CELL Adv CHO Feed 1 surfaced, the industry relied on animal-derived feeds and piecemeal supplementation, hoping to boost growth and protein yield. Many of us remember the struggle with inconsistent results—each batch giving surprises nobody wanted. Technical teams spent countless hours troubleshooting what went wrong, often pinning issues on bad media lots. That frustration laid the groundwork for innovation. People in the lab started to rethink not only the recipes but also the expectations for cell-specific nutrition. Feed platforms like the EX-CELL family came out of the push for more reliable, animal-free, and chemically defined solutions, especially for CHO (Chinese Hamster Ovary) cells, which became an icon for therapeutic protein production. Years of research, careful observation, and a lot of trial and error went into making these modern feeds. By the time Adv CHO Feed 1 landed, scientists wanted something that met safety demands and took the guesswork out of daily culture.
Looking at solutions for driving high-density cultures, EX-CELL Adv CHO Feed 1 stands out thanks to its focus on controlled, predictable performance for CHO cells. Instead of using animal or hydrolysate components, it uses only chemically defined ingredients, so each batch acts the same as the last. This makes scale-up less nerve-wracking. Everyday users keep talking about the ease it brings, removing streaky, unreliable protein expression from the conversation. It exists not as a miracle fix, but as a carefully built platform for bioprocess professionals keen on stability and compliance. The product lets R&D labs and commercial biomanufacturers push for higher yields and better product quality without a string of mystery ingredients. That kind of clarity matters, especially as regulatory agencies put more pressure on source traceability. There’s no magic bullet in cell culture feeds, but Adv CHO Feed 1 brings a pragmatic degree of consistency that makes day-to-day work and long-term planning much more straightforward.
Understanding what sits on the lab bench helps everyone using it. EX-CELL Adv CHO Feed 1 comes as a dry, free-flowing powder, which speaks to easy handling and longer shelf life compared to liquid options. Chemically, it’s a blend of amino acids, vitamins, trace elements, carbohydrates, and other defined constituents. Its solubility profile fits the intense process of large-batch feeds—people want to avoid clumps and residue, since that spells trouble at scale. The product’s pH range after rehydration keeps cell health on track, and it doesn’t throw off osmolality, so cells keep growing strong. When measured, the lot-to-lot variation runs tight; operators usually record consistent concentrations and activity profiles, helping projects avoid surprises. That sort of repeatable output ties straight into smoother validation and robust process control, both of which would fall apart if the product cut corners on design or quality assurance.
In practice, specs and labeling guide every operator and scientist using a technical product. Anyone who’s poured through regulatory submissions or QA files knows the drain of unclear labeling or missing details. EX-CELL Adv CHO Feed 1 tells users what’s present, covering every additive and buffer. This makes audits less tense. No one wonders if the feed harbors animal-origin traces or hidden allergens. Standards require chemical feeds to match their label claims; the product backs these up with reliable, independently verified guarantees. Technical sheets walk through concentration targets and preparation guidelines, reflecting years of user feedback and compliance demands. Delivering on that level of transparency does more than satisfy guidelines. It shows the product’s intent not only to fuel cell growth but also to do so under full regulatory and operational scrutiny, critical for today’s biotech operators.
Those who manage media prep know the difference between fiddly, error-prone feeds and dependable, user-friendly blends. EX-CELL Adv CHO Feed 1 gets reconstituted by dissolving the dry mix straight into high-purity water, stirred and adjusted for pH before going to cells. Its instructions help technicians avoid mistakes—no one likes discovering half-dissolved chunks or off-kilter pH after a long prep. Clean input water, steady stirring, and the right environment bring the product together. Preparation protocols have been refined so even new techs can make a good batch their first try. Speed, clarity, and error-resistance in protocols keep busy process development teams on track, especially during high-pressure campaigns. Waste and variability drop when mix-ups or mysterious residues don’t show up in the final feed, highlighting how product design and user experience go hand-in-hand.
Every bioprocess throws up its own hurdles—unexpected pH swings, nutrient spikes or drops, cell line quirks that confound baseline solutions. Rather than be a one-size-fits-all, feeds like EX-CELL Adv CHO Feed 1 support process modifications without losing their backbone. Adjusting amino acids, fine-tuning trace metals, or supplementing with tailored additives stay within practical reach. In use, the feed’s stability in bioreactor conditions matters, especially when metabolites threaten to tip balances and suppress cell health. No one benefits from sudden chemical breakdowns or off-target byproducts; by engineering feed reactions to stay predictable, developers reinforce cell performance and protein output. Feedback from users feeds directly into ongoing tweaks, closing the loop between R&D and production floors. As protein drug recipes change and new targets get considered, the ability to adapt the feed without risking collapse offers both flexibility and peace of mind.
Naming in the bioprocess world gets tricky. “EX-CELL Adv CHO Feed 1” might show up in literature under related names or abbreviations, and sharing knowledge with other scientists means learning the shorthand. In lab speak, people often call it simply “CHO Feed 1” or by catalog descriptors. Avoiding generic names means the right product shows up on shelves, minimizing errors in procurement or usage. Experienced operators get caught up less by branding and more by clear technical references, since the distinctions among similarly named feeds lead to very real differences in cell behavior. Communication in the team, and clarity in supply chains, depends on using the right product names so there’s no confusion or mix-up from order to application.
Few things worry lab managers more than product recalls or safety scares. Chemically defined feeds shrink those risks by removing animal constituents and undefined sources, boosting biosafety profiles across biomanufacturing and research settings. Operators appreciate feed lines like EX-CELL Adv CHO Feed 1 for their low bioburden risk—especially in GMP (Good Manufacturing Practice) settings, where cross-contamination leads to massive setbacks. Routine handling calls for basic PPE, careful reconstitution, and strict cleanliness. Even so, workers avoid nasty hazards often associated with less-refined media options. Safety doesn’t just mean the feed itself; it means a cleaner workflow, reduced waste, and fewer safety incidents—something lab veterans value after too many near-misses or unplanned decontamination events. Codifying best practices into every stage of production, labeling, and use ensures teams spend less time firefighting and more time developing new products or improving yields.
EX-CELL Adv CHO Feed 1 finds its calling in biopharmaceutical production, especially in scaling up monoclonal antibodies and other recombinant proteins. Along the journey from shake flask to bioreactor, people get tangible results: tighter control of cell density, longer runs without critical drops, and increases in . These benefits go beyond the bench and into the heart of commercial production. Downstream teams notice the effect, too, as cleaner feeds mean fewer nasty surprises during purification. Even in academic settings, where budgets matter and variables multiply, defined feeds offer a clear edge in reproducibility. The end users—patients waiting for safe, effective therapies—may never hear about CHO Feed 1, but its impact on supply, quality, and product safety plays out in every dose. As gene therapies and new biologics multiply, the importance of a reliable, scalable, and safe feed grows further, anchoring new advances on a foundation of hard-won trust.
No one expects cell culture products to stay static. R&D groups worldwide dig into these feeds, probing every ingredient, every process tweak, searching for new yields or cleaner profiles. I’ve sat through meeting after meeting where process scientists and chemists debate subtle adjustments—should zinc levels shift, should a different carbohydrate enter the mix, does that trace element help or harm? These questions never go away. With CHO Feed 1, the structure lets researchers pursue continuous improvement, running side-by-side comparisons and chasing the next few percent in production uplift. Major advances usually come not through revolution but through relentless small steps: a minor tweak here, a purity boost there, month after month. That kind of opportunity for modification and rigorous screening keeps companies competitive and opens up new frontiers whenever the molecules change or the demands of regulators jump. Working with such feeds, R&D teams can refocus from firefighting toward optimization, which ultimately elevates everything produced down the line.
Everyone in bioprocessing has seen stories of cell feeds causing downstream toxicity, often hiding in overlooked metabolites or ill-considered additives. With a chemically defined feed like EX-CELL Adv CHO Feed 1, the picture grows less cloudy—a known composition helps both in predicting potential cytotoxicity and in troubleshooting the rare problems that do arise. Toxicity research on these feeds tracks not just how cells fare during growth, but whether residuals complicate purification, risk product safety, or impact final therapies. Most reports show negligible risk profiles, provided prep and application stick to validated protocols. This stands as a real improvement over legacy feeds with unknown or variable backgrounds. Product designers regularly review toxicological data, both from in-house studies and real-world usage, feeding lessons back into the next versions. Keeping an open channel between product developers, bioprocess scientists, and safety regulators ensures feeds remain above reproach, adding to the confidence biomanufacturers need when lives are on the line.
The field never slows. Cell line engineering, novel molecules, and stricter regulatory standards demand continuous evolution of feed platforms. EX-CELL Adv CHO Feed 1 already supports a broad slice of biotech, but new proteins and unique production challenges emerge every year. The next wave likely means deeper customization—feeds built not just for a generic CHO cell, but for the quirks of individual clones or expression systems. Sustainability also enters the conversation; as demand grows, minimizing resource use and waste takes center stage. Data-driven development, enabled by closer user feedback loops and advanced analytics, looks set to drive the next generation of feeds. As therapies become more complex and personalized, only flexible, high-quality, traceable feeds will hold their ground, helping companies deliver both breakthroughs and reliability. Stakeholders up and down the chain—from early research through global supply—will push feeds to do more with less, and those that adapt smartly will keep their edge in one of biotech’s most demanding arenas.
Across labs and manufacturing suites, Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cells power much of what makes today’s biotech tick. They’re the workhorses behind many therapeutic proteins, monoclonal antibodies, and even some vaccines. Growing CHO cells means meeting their nutritional needs step by step—and that’s where EX-CELL Adv CHO Feed 1 comes in.
I’ve seen firsthand how production teams juggle the demands of massive cell cultures. The wrong feed leaves scientists with poor cell health, low protein yields, or proteins that don’t behave as expected. Over the years, the right feed often made or broke a project’s success. EX-CELL Adv CHO Feed 1 delivers nutrients, vitamins, trace elements, and growth factors, so these mammalian cells can thrive and keep producing the proteins researchers count on.
Not all feeds work the same. Some lead to unpredictable results or force teams into endless troubleshooting. Feeds like EX-CELL Adv CHO Feed 1 help teams side-step these issues. Its formulation supports consistent growth, even as cultures scale from shake flasks up to industrial bioreactors. Consistent nutrients allow for steady protein output. This means less batch-to-batch variation, a headache that usually spells delays and extra cost.
Animal-derived additives can introduce contaminants or allergens, raising red flags during regulatory review. Relaying on animal component-free feeds like EX-CELL Adv CHO Feed 1 lets developers avoid those risks. I’ve spoken with regulatory specialists: they look for safety, consistency, and clear documentation. By keeping animal materials out, manufacturers address safety concerns and build trust with oversight agencies. That’s important as products move through the clinical pipeline toward approval.
With the cost of biologic medicines already high, streamlining production matters at every stage. A well-designed feed like EX-CELL Adv CHO Feed 1 enables high-density cell growth and longer culture cycles, which translates into higher protein yields per liter of culture. Fewer resources get used per gram of product, which supports both financial goals and environmental stewardship.
Since demands in biopharma never stop changing, flexibility helps companies keep up. Technology keeps improving, but many process improvements begin with something as basic as what goes into the cell culture vessel. EX-CELL Adv CHO Feed 1 gives scientists and engineers a solid nutritional baseline, letting them focus on optimizing the rest of their process. It doesn’t guarantee blockbuster drugs by itself, but it supports reliable cell performance in an industry where reliability means everything.
As new biologics get more complex, feeds will need to keep up—delivering nutrients tailored to specialized processes or unique cell lines. Suppliers could work more closely with manufacturers to develop feeds for cutting-edge applications, like viral vector production or cell therapies. Greater transparency about feed composition and origin would also help companies facing ever-tightening regulatory scrutiny.
EX-CELL Advanced CHO Feed 1 turns up in plenty of biotech discussions, especially among cell culture specialists. People want to know if it’s a true chemically defined medium. It helps to clear away technical fog and look at what chemically defined means in real-world lab work.
A chemically defined medium uses only known, pure chemical components. No peptones, no hydrolysates, no unknown animal-origin ingredients. Each molecule is listed on the product sheet, which takes the guesswork out of your protocol. Back in school, I learned to appreciate this clarity after more than a few failed batches traced to some hidden, inconsistent additive buried in an “undefined” medium.
EX-CELL Advanced CHO Feed 1 is manufactured without proteins, animal-derived ingredients, yeast extract, or hydrolysates. This supports its reputation as a chemically defined feed, which matters for researchers demanding certainty in reproducibility and regulatory submission. If you’re aiming for consistent monoclonal antibody production, chemical definition reduces day-to-day surprises—a blessing in facilities mixing dozens of feeds and cell lines.
Regulators, especially the FDA and EMA, frown at anything that brings ambiguity into manufacturing. For a company scaling up biologics, switching to chemically defined media trims risk. No animal components means a lower chance of viral contaminants sneaking in. I remember a biotech team spending months chasing variability in their process, only to track it back to a single batch of protein hydrolysate. That experience taught me it’s worth paying for transparency.
Chemically defined feeds also support process optimization. Every change in feed can be measured, repeated, and explained. In my own hands, the results proved better when the recipe held no secrets—cell growth became easier to troubleshoot, and tweaking nutrient levels felt less like a guessing game.
Some labs stick with less defined media because they worry about reduced growth or productivity. I’ve faced pushback when moving teams from “old faithful” hydrolysate-based media to something like EX-CELL Advanced CHO Feed 1. There’s a fear that if you remove all the mystery components, the cells won’t thrive. But published studies and real-world manufacturing runs keep showing that, once optimized, chemically defined feeds can match or surpass traditional performance.
Cost comes up too. Chemically defined feeds sometimes carry a higher price. It’s hard to ignore tight budgets, especially if you manage a scale-up facility. But after factoring in fewer batch failures and smoother regulatory audits, the economics begin to tilt in favor of better-defined products.
For folks on the fence, start with pilot batches. Test cell performance and product quality in parallel with your current medium. Share data with teams and be transparent about outcomes. Labs that made the switch found issues around adaptation could be solved with careful monitoring and incremental changes, not all-or-nothing moves.
Suppliers also keep refining their recipes, tuning amino acid levels and trace element blends based on customer feedback. Don’t hesitate to reach out to tech support. In my experience, companies that work closely with vendors reap the rewards in troubleshooting and faster fixes.
After years in cell culture labs, I see value in knowing exactly what goes into each bottle. Chemically defined media like EX-CELL Advanced CHO Feed 1 offer that trust and consistency that gets projects across finish lines—and to patients who depend on safe, effective therapies.
Anyone working around cell culture knows that small details pack a heavy punch. How you store manufactured feeds like EX-CELL Adv CHO Feed 1 shapes the fate of your culture runs. A missed temperature check or a bit of careless exposure can spell the difference between a productive bioreactor and a troubleshooting nightmare. In research labs I've worked with, the only thing more certain than Murphy's Law is the relentless need for purity and consistency. When colleagues grumble about unpredictable growth curves, improper storage is often to blame.
Temperature stands front and center for keeping nutrient feeds fresh. This particular feed wants a cool footprint: keep containers tucked away at 2°C to 8°C. Room temperature storage brings out trouble: sugars might degrade, vitamins can lose their punch, and the risk of microbial growth climbs. Sometimes, the fridge seems like a hassle, but it's nothing compared to a ruined experiment or production batch.
Avoiding Light and Moisture deserves attention. Store this dry powder or concentrated liquid in a dark, dry environment. Sunlight and humid air turn a favorite supplement into a shelf hazard. Humidity sneaks in, binding with the mix and setting off clumping or early nutrient breakdown.
Seal Integrity plays a huge role. Every time someone opens a container without properly resealing it, they're letting in the very air and moisture that can introduce contaminants—or just take the zip out of key nutrients. I still remember that one time an unsealed bottle led to three wasted days, all because nobody put the lid on tight.
EX-CELL Adv CHO Feed 1 includes a lot number and an expiration date right on the label. Stickers might seem like a formality, but skipping this step often creates headaches down the line. Always check: expired media turns into an unreliable partner. Tracking lots brings peace of mind, especially during troubleshooting or quality review. For regulated work, like commercial biologics, this practice is non-negotiable.
Transferring feed from bulk bags or bottles demands a clean setting. Wherever possible, open containers in a biosafety cabinet. Use gloves, avoid scooping with unclean utensils, and never pour powder back into the original container. Cross-contamination happens faster than people expect, and even a short exposure can punish complicated cell lines.
Assign one spot for feed storage and label it clearly. I’ve seen plenty of labs lose valuable materials to simple mix-ups—right product, wrong fridge. Schedule regular audits to check for expired material, damaged packaging, or inventory errors. Encourage a habit of immediate returns after every use to prevent accidental temperature swings, as multiple thaw-freeze cycles reduce the reliability of nutrient blends.
Putting effort into good storage makes labs run smoother. Researchers and production techs protect their results, and manufacturers preserve the integrity of their feed. The stakes are more than just one batch—reproducibility, safety, and budgets get protected, too. Treating storage as a crucial part of the process keeps everything growing strong.
Working in a lab means juggling a dozen details each day. My experience with mammalian cell culture has taught me that every step—from thawing cells to harvesting protein—hinges on small but crucial decisions. One thing that never seems minor is selecting the best match between cell line and feed. Each batch of feed, like EX-CELL Adv CHO Feed 1, brings a unique profile of nutrients, vitamins, and peptides. Its formula supports cell growth, but not every cell line thrives the same way.
EX-CELL Adv CHO Feed 1 shows clear compatibility with Chinese Hamster Ovary (CHO) cells, especially the suspension-adapted lines. Companies and academic labs often turn to these workhorse cells for antibody and protein production. CHO-S, CHO-K1, and derivatives engineered for high protein output absorb and metabolize the nutrients from this supplement efficiently. The supplement delivers amino acids and trace elements tailored for these cells, supporting higher titers and stable production over long culture periods.
Different CHO lines—like CHO-DG44 or CHOZN—respond with high viability and robust protein yield. I have also seen positive results with engineered GS-CHO lines. BCIRL/CHO cells and CHO-DXB11 lines, which require supplement support due to auxotrophic markers, handle this feed without metabolic bottlenecks. The chemistry of EX-CELL Adv CHO Feed 1 cuts down on batch-to-batch variation, so consistency becomes less of a worry for scale-up. For large bioreactor runs, that reliability makes a difference; a stumble there means days of lost work.
Feed compatibility shapes project timelines and budgets more than many grant writers anticipate. I learned early in my career—after too many failed cultures—that growth medium and feed can’t just be “close enough.” CHO cells can suffer if nutrient blends fail to meet their adaptation level or metabolism. Some lines, after months of adaptation, digest new feeds poorly or grow at half their previous rate. Switching to a well-matched supplement, with proven compatibility data behind it, saves troubleshooting and keeps projects on pace.
Researchers who push for higher protein yield in biopharmaceutical production can see measurable differences after introducing EX-CELL Adv CHO Feed 1. Higher viability, heavier cell density, and stable metabolites show up in side-by-side batch tests. Lab partners often remark on how cell health holds steady through extended culture—a crucial advantage in pursuing regulatory approval for drug manufacturing.
Despite its strength with CHO lines, EX-CELL Adv CHO Feed 1 falls short with non-CHO cells. HEK293, NS0, or SP2/0 lines require other feeding solutions—pretty clear in side-by-side cultures where growth falters outside the hamster ovary family. For new projects or process changes, my approach always includes a brief adaptation period and shake flask trials. Investing a week up front beats overhauling a faltering process.
Open conversation with suppliers—asking for specific compatibility data or real-case studies—often brings surprising details. Sometimes manufacturers hold field data that never makes it to product sheets. For labs planning a new cell line or scaling up, these behind-the-scenes insights shine a light on possible pitfalls. Peer forums and consortiums help bridge gaps, sharing experience-driven advice that speeds progress and avoids avoidable setbacks.
Nothing replaces firsthand testing, but solid peer-reviewed studies and transparently shared supplier data set researchers up for success. When matching cell lines and feeds, science rewards the patient, the skeptical, and the well-informed.
Working with CHO cells feels like a tightrope walk. Every batch tells its own story, and reliable feeds play a big role in how that story turns out. EX-CELL Adv CHO Feed 1 won’t write your process manual for you, but it sets the stage for solid results. This feed gets most attention in monoclonal antibody work, but I’ve seen teams reaching for it with all kinds of recombinant proteins. People choose it when they want steady, dependable growth without too many surprises.
Fed-batch operations tend to get the most benefit out of this supplement. If you’re feeding by schedule, consider more frequent additions at lower volumes. In my experience, cells push performance longer and metabolites build up more slowly. Daily or twice-daily additions outpace big, infrequent boluses. You end up with less stress on cells, and product titer responds. The target is usually between 5–10% by culture volume, split across the run. That’s not a strict recipe, just a range most workflows center around. Very high or low feed rates ask for extra monitoring, especially if you’re leaning toward high cell densities or using cell lines with unusual metabolisms.
It’s tempting to look for a perfect schedule, but flexibility matters more. Monitor glucose, lactate, and ammonia. Steady glucose above 2 g/L keeps energy stores up. If glucose starts to spike, it signals too much feed or poor uptake—ease up or stretch the intervals. High lactate tells me the culture’s stressed, often from nutrient overload or oxygen limits. Don’t ignore this red flag. Whichever method you start with—fixed or feedback-driven—expect to make tweaks based on your batch history.
Keeping an eye on osmolality can’t be skipped. Once values creep past 400 mOsm/kg, growth starts to slow and cells get unhappy. In the labs I’ve worked in, diluting feed with base medium or spacing out doses helps a lot. Don’t just wait for numbers to get out of range—track the trend, and act early. If you pay attention, you catch issues before they chip away at yields or glycosylation quality.
A lot of teams start by following the product sheet, but I’ve learned that talking to peers and sharing batch logs opens up new ideas. Some groups add amino acids or custom supplements alongside EX-CELL Adv CHO Feed 1 for products with tricky folding or post-translational tweaks. Amino acid analysis or metabolic profiling aren’t only for big pharma. Even smaller outfits use these tools for smarter adjustments between runs. Recently, single-use bioreactors and online sensors made it much easier to track responses in real time. Tuning pH and dissolved oxygen alongside your feed schedule smooths out rough patches and lowers stress on the culture.
No matter the goal, every team wants to see consistency in their results. EX-CELL Adv CHO Feed 1 helps with that, but nothing replaces regular checks and open record keeping. People sometimes underestimate how much history matters—previous runs, cell age, thaw day, and supplements build a story that teaches future batches. Every data point can become a decision point.
Results always tell the truth, even if it isn’t pleasant. EX-CELL Adv CHO Feed 1 gives a steady foundation, but every lab gets to shape the outcome. Building feeding strategies around observation and careful tracking gives the most value. Relying on facts—not assumptions—avoids costly setbacks. From my own time at the bench, listening to the data instead of tradition leads to better growth, stronger titers, and a smoother path toward scale-up.
| Names | |
| Preferred IUPAC name | 2-hydroxy-N,N-dimethylacetamide |
| Other names |
EX-CELL Advanced CHO Feed 1 CHO Feed 1 |
| Pronunciation | /ɛks-ˈsɛl ædˈvæns tʃiː-oʊ fiːd wʌn/ |
| Identifiers | |
| CAS Number | 1514187-04-6 |
| Beilstein Reference | 1464206 |
| ChEBI | CHEBI:16541 |
| ChEMBL | CHEMBL3833085 |
| ChemSpider | null |
| DrugBank | DBSALT004753 |
| ECHA InfoCard | 06d347bc-cf69-43ac-bc5b-9f9ca2638f8c |
| EC Number | 14229C |
| Gmelin Reference | 1424912 |
| KEGG | C11262 |
| MeSH | D05.750.078.730.360 |
| PubChem CID | 24715296 |
| UNII | 6FGA6E70XW |
| UN number | UN Not classified |
| Properties | |
| Molar mass | 18000 mg/L |
| Appearance | Clear to slightly hazy liquid |
| Odor | Characteristic |
| Density | 1.04 g/mL |
| Solubility in water | Soluble in water |
| log P | 4.7 |
| Acidity (pKa) | Acidity (pKa): 7.1 |
| Basicity (pKb) | 8.5 |
| Refractive index (nD) | 1.345 to 1.355 |
| Viscosity | 12 cP |
| Pharmacology | |
| ATC code | EXC001 |
| Hazards | |
| Main hazards | May cause respiratory irritation. |
| GHS labelling | GHS07, GHS08 |
| Pictograms | GHS07, GHS09 |
| Signal word | Warning |
| Hazard statements | H315: Causes skin irritation. H319: Causes serious eye irritation. H335: May cause respiratory irritation. |
| Precautionary statements | Precautionary statements: P281 Use personal protective equipment as required. |
| NFPA 704 (fire diamond) | 1-0-0 |
| LD50 (median dose) | LD50: >5000 mg/kg |
| NIOSH | 53-0017MA |
| PEL (Permissible) | 10 mg/m3 |
| REL (Recommended) | 3 – 6 g/L |
| Related compounds | |
| Related compounds |
EX-CELL Advanced CHO Fed-batch Medium EX-CELL Advanced CHO Feed 2 EX-CELL Advanced CHO Feed 3 |
