Growing up around scientists meant spending weekends in quiet labs and watching flasks of mysterious fluids swirl under fluorescent lights. Out of all those bottles on the cold shelves, Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle’s Medium, or DMEM, always appeared on the front lines whenever mammalian cells needed some nurturing. This was not by accident. Since Renato Dulbecco introduced his modification in the 1950s, this medium changed the game for cell culture. The early years of tissue culture struggled with short cell lifespans, unpredictable growth, and contamination issues. Dulbecco, frustrated by inconsistent results, boosted nutrient concentrations, including glucose, and adapted the amino acid profile. In doing so, he gave researchers a tool that unlocked a surge in understanding cancer, virology, and genetics over the last five decades. Without those tweaks, countless milestones in molecular biology would have faced agonizing delays. Before DMEM, Eagle’s Minimum Essential Medium paved the way, but the jump to higher glucose levels in Dulbecco’s formula was what allowed high-intensity cell models—essential for gene editing, vaccine production, and regenerative medicine—to thrive under often stressful lab conditions.
Anyone who has worked with DMEM will recognize its pink-red hue, thanks to phenol red buffering. This color is more than just a visual cue. It signals pH status, so researchers can make quick judgment calls about contamination or CO2 imbalances. Most high-glucose versions carry about 4.5 grams per liter of glucose—nearly quadruple the standard. That abundance suits fast-growing lines like HEK293, CHO, and hybridoma cells. The formulation balances more than a dozen amino acids, several vitamins (like folic acid, riboflavin, and pyridoxine), and salts to mimic intercellular fluids. Sodium bicarbonate steps in to buffer pH, particularly useful in laboratory incubators flooded with CO2. Classic DMEM skips animal serum, so scientists add fetal bovine serum or specialty supplements to drive specific differentiation or proliferation paths. This flexibility underpins innovation, allowing a simple change in supplement recipe to shift Madin-Darby canine kidney cells toward tissue engineering, or to prime mouse fibroblasts for CRISPR experiments.
At room temperature, DMEM’s powdered form clumps quickly, so humidity and air-tight containers become concerns for storerooms everywhere. Once dissolved, the solution matches a mild hypotonic salt content. Its osmolarity and pH land squarely in ranges long proven optimal for most primary and immortalized cells. The glucose bump is more than just a calorie boost; it supports anaerobic glycolysis, helping cells tolerate metabolic or oxidative stress. The chemical dance between calcium, magnesium, and phosphate in DMEM regularly draws concern—improper ratios will cause unwanted precipitation that sabotages cultures. Phenol red, long considered harmless, has faced scrutiny as a potential endocrine disruptor for certain sensitive cell lines, though most routine experiments weather its effects. Temperature, light, and air exposure chip away at the stability of dissolved DMEM, so kitchen-sink storage habits wreak havoc on consistency. Many seasoned lab folks keep stocks tightly wrapped in foil, stashed at 2-8°C, and freeze small aliquots to dodge contamination risk.
Each bottle flashes a cryptic series of specifications that new lab members quickly learn to decipher: glucose concentration, sodium pyruvate supplementation, phenol red presence, and whether glutamine comes built-in. These differences matter. Adding L-glutamine stabilizes rapidly dividing cells but shortens shelf life. The label’s pH range, typically between 7.0 and 7.4, indicates quality control. Osmolality, measured in milliosmoles per kilogram, sits near 320 mOsm/kg for high-glucose versions, reflecting the careful attention paid to prevent osmotic shock. These aren’t just numbers—they reflect decades of argument and trial among scientists dedicated to coaxing finicky cells into revealing biological truths. Custom labels sometimes specify antibiotic inclusion (penicillin, streptomycin), intended only for combating rogue bacterial invaders, not for routine or delicate cell work. Detailed expiry dates and storage recommendations stem from batch variability, not guesswork, rooted in the messy history of cell culture contamination and experimental failure.
Preparing DMEM in the lab has always felt like a chemistry rite of passage. Technicians don gloves and goggles, weigh precise powder blends, and dissolve them under gentle stirring. The warmth of the water and pH must fall within strict ranges. Even a slight miscalculation in the sodium bicarbonate concentration or an overly enthusiastic addition of HCl or NaOH dooms the batch with precipitation or off-target pH. Filtration through a 0.22-micron filter, required for sterilization, tests the patience of anyone in a rush—clogged filters bring everything to a halt. Once prepared, the solution must head straight into sterile bottles and the cold room. Open air invites bacterial and fungal contaminants capable of spoiling days of prep in a single afternoon. A reliable preparation run encourages confidence in next week’s experimental plans; a sloppy run means lost time and budget, a scenario every research assistant comes to dread. Over the years, manufacturers have optimized premade liquid forms to minimize error, but in resource-stretched environments, in-house mixing remains a mainstay.
Investigators don’t stop at the original recipe. Modern labs design custom batches of DMEM, adding sodium pyruvate to feed more demanding cell lines or swapping out glucose for galactose to probe metabolic flexibility. Some prefer formulations minus phenol red for hormone-sensitive models. Different labs or suppliers apply various abbreviations or catalog identifiers, but “DMEM high glucose,” “Dulbecco’s High Glucose Medium,” and “DMEM 4.5g/L glucose” end up meaning the same stew of nutrients. You’ll also hear “HG-DMEM” in protocol shorthand. For all the technical jargon, conversation in the break room usually just refers to “high-glucose DMEM,” a phrase that’s as close to an inside joke as science gets. These variations, though subtle, reflect the evolving needs of researchers who tinker relentlessly, each minor change rippling through the experimental process, costing or saving months of work. The manufacturer or lot influences not just quality but results—labs often face the temptation to stockpile a favored lot that has yielded positive results in crucial projects.
DMEM does not carry obvious hazards for users when handled properly, but mistakes or sloppiness can inflict bigger problems. Powdered medium creates fine dust; inhaling it should set off alarms in any experienced researcher, though the actual chemicals in DMEM rarely cross dangerous thresholds. Gloves, masks, and eye shields make a habit out of protecting against accidental splashes or contact. Ethylene oxide sterilization of packaging materials still leaves room for chemical residue traces; rigorous washing and rinsing of new glassware cut down on cross-contamination and unexpected cell responses. Labs run regular sterility checks—not as a tick-box safety exercise, but because too many promising cell lines have vanished thanks to mycoplasma or fungus sneaking in from an uncapped bottle. The most skilled cell biologists I know become obsessive about nook-and-cranny cleaning wherever DMEM is used, viewing this not as bureaucratic hassle but as guarantees that next week’s cultures will look the same as last month’s.
DMEM’s reach stretches across the world’s busiest life science labs. Most iconic, immortal cell lines—HeLa, 3T3, A549—owe their survival to DMEM’s balanced nutrients. Biotech firms counting on monoclonal antibody production demand the high-energy conditions that high-glucose DMEM supplies. Academic groups pushing into CRISPR screens regularly report that a simple change in DMEM batch can make or break their knockout experiment. Regenerative medicine, seeking to turn stem cells into skin, heart, or pancreas tissue, depends on DMEM to keep cells happy during long and delicate differentiation protocols. Even vaccine manufacturers rely on the medium’s consistency; large-scale cell banks, whether for polio or COVID-19, get fed on tons of liquid DMEM every year. DMEM levels the playing field so that discoveries in Boston or Beijing start from the same baseline, letting data replicate, protocols scale up, and results speak back to the scientific community. The medium’s success stories make the rounds at conferences, but nobody forgets its silent failures, either—one botched bottle, one mislabeling, and a year of blood, sweat, and ingenuity disappears.
Science never stops asking how to do better. Research into DMEM’s contents continues—particularly the glucose, which, while supporting robust growth, sometimes induces metabolic stress or experimental artifacts not seen in more physiological models. High-glucose conditions can drive oxidative stress and promote aberrant signaling, especially in neurons or pancreatic beta cells, muddling the translation of in vitro results to real human biology. Some groups strip back glucose or swap to “low-glucose” variants for diabetes work, yet always compare findings against standard DMEM-grown controls. Toxicity isn’t usually a direct worry, but cumulative effects—trace heavy metals, altered redox states, or batch-to-batch variation—spark new vigilance. Regulatory oversight focuses more on sterility than content, but the push for serum-free, xeno-free, or even “open-source” chemically defined versions of DMEM has only intensified as labs edge toward translational and clinical work. Looking ahead, I expect cellular agriculture and clinical-grade tissue engineering to demand new recipes. Synthetic biology now powers the engineering of “smart” media that release nutrients in response to cell signals, or that recycle costly substrates.
Every generation of researchers faces the same challenge: support cell growth without compromising experimental goals. The history of Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle’s Medium stands as a prime example of small changes bringing about huge consequences. Facts have proved that medium composition alters everything from growth rate to gene expression profiles; scientists ignore these details only to regret it later. As industries and academia partner more closely, the pressure for tailored media, better transparency, and open-access protocols will only grow. Quality control will need stricter oversight—not just for purity, but for batch consistency and source transparency. At the same time, as DMEM-inspired recipes enter the realm of bioreactors, personalized medicine, and synthetic organs, reliance on just one recipe may fade, opening space for continuous innovation.
Anyone who has spent time at a biosafety cabinet, pipetting solutions back and forth, knows the critical role that nutrient mixtures play in growing cells. Dulbecco's Modified Eagle's Medium (High Glucose), better known as DMEM High Glucose, has become a staple in labs where mammalian cells grow for research. The main draw comes from its boosted glucose level, which powers more demanding cell types that struggle in standard formulations. Cancer cell lines, primary cultures fresh from animal tissue, and even some stem cells often flourish in this mix. Scientists noticed higher viability and faster doubling times after swapping to high-glucose DMEM, especially for fast-growing or metabolically active cultures.
Living cells rely on glucose as a primary source of energy. Normal DMEM contains about 1g/L glucose, but the high-glucose variety packs 4.5g/L. That’s a noticeable difference in fuel for cells under stress or dividing quickly. In my own experience, hybridoma lines generated for antibody studies put out more product when given this extra sugar. In tricky experiments that take several days or weeks—watching neurons extend axons, for example—the extra glucose helps stave off the “starvation effect,” where cells slow or even self-destruct due to depleted nutrients.
DMEM High Glucose plays a big role in everything from vaccine production to basic cancer biology. When researchers test new drugs or screen chemical libraries, they need cells that behave as close to normal as possible, not cells weakened by lack of nutrients. For myself and countless others, reliable growth conditions translate into steady data. It's not an overstatement to say that treatments now in clinical trials trace back to cultures maintained in this exact medium.
High glucose also brings its own bag of issues. Some cell types, including pancreatic beta cells or primary hepatocytes, don't react well to so much sugar. Too much glucose alters signaling, gene expression, and even triggers cell death in some sensitive lines. Researchers noticed—sometimes the hard way—that results from high-glucose media don’t always apply in normal physiological settings. Diabetes and metabolic syndrome-focused studies regularly compare results from high-glucose DMEM to low-glucose or even custom-made sugar-free media to untangle genuine findings from artifacts driven by an unnatural environment.
The push for more "in vivo-like" results is changing how many labs design their experiments. Some biologists engineer their own blends to match plasma from patients or animals, using high-glucose DMEM as a starting point. Others monitor glucose depletion over time and top up as needed instead of drowning cells in sugar. Over time, scientific journals ask for tighter experimental controls, and researchers raise questions about any potential confounding effects of their culture choices.
A strong approach relies on understanding the demands of each cell line and what the experiment seeks to reveal. Validating findings with different media strengthens claims. If data holds up under varying conditions, confidence grows. Suppliers continue to improve the formulations by removing unnecessary additives or balancing electrolytes more closely to real-life conditions. Better cell models and careful attention to glucose effects will keep labs honest and push discoveries to stand up outside the culture dish.
Standard cell cultures depend on a few key players: nutrients, minerals, serum, and one especially important sugar — glucose. Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle Medium (DMEM) is among the most widely used cell culture media in research labs. The “high glucose” variant contains 4,500 milligrams per liter (mg/L), or 25 millimoles per liter (mM). That’s almost four and a half times as much glucose compared to “low glucose” DMEM, which holds 1,000 mg/L.
Not all cells thrive under the same conditions. Certain lines, especially those derived from cancer or immortalized tissues, crank through nutrients rapidly and can outpace low-glucose media fast. High glucose media steps in where heavy lifting is needed: rapidly dividing cells, stem cell expansion, or experiments that stress cells metabolically. Back in graduate school, culturing fibroblasts sometimes left me puzzled by sluggish growth. Shifting from low to high glucose DMEM brought instant changes—cells grew thick overnight, reminding me just how tight the balance gets.
Glucose regulation isn’t just about keeping cells alive. Researchers pay close attention because glucose metabolism steers cell fate, gene expression, and even how well treatments work in models of disease. A high-glucose environment simulates a diabetic state. Low glucose mimics fasting or metabolic stress. Scientists working on insulin signaling, cancer metabolism, or neurobiology know that a few points up or down can shift results by more than a little.
Standardizing at 4,500 mg/L lets teams compare notes across labs. Most catalog suppliers, such as Gibco or Sigma-Aldrich, list high-glucose DMEM at this exact number for consistency. Skipping glucose checks or misreading concentrations risks skewed data, failed experiments, and wasted resources. I once saw a colleague mix up bottles, and the glucose difference tanked her cell viability overnight. No amount of troubleshooting could recover her lost time.
Maintaining the right glucose level means more than just checking the label on the bottle. With every media change, cells pull glucose from their environment. Bacterial contamination, even at low levels, acts like a stealthy burglar, siphoning off sugars and starving cells. Regular monitoring with glucose test strips or meters, normally used in hospital labs, prevents surprises. In resource-limited situations, some labs prepare their own DMEM and adjust glucose manually using laboratory-grade D-glucose. Nothing beats double-checking that mix to match the 4,500 mg/L mark closely.
Glucose concentration works best as part of an overall strategy for healthy cell growth. Cells need more than sugar—amino acids, vitamins, trace minerals, and the right pH all count. Running side-by-side batches, comparing low and high glucose settings, gives more insight into how a cell type responds. That level of careful setup reminds us why transparency and detailed record-keeping matter. Nobody enjoys chasing dead ends caused by an overlooked number on a media label.
In any bench science, the small stuff — like nailing glucose at the right concentration — costs far less effort than chasing after problems later. Glucose at 4,500 mg/L anchors DMEM high glucose, giving cells the boost they demand and letting scientists trust the stories those cells will tell.
DMEM High Glucose, or Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle Medium, supports the health and growth of cultured cells in biology labs across the world. Anyone familiar with tissue culture will recognize the telltale pink or red solution packed in bottles, lined up like soldiers in laboratory refrigerators. Cell health depends not only on what goes in the dish, but also on how we treat our supplies outside of experiments. Sloppy storage won’t just mess with nutrient levels; it puts the entire experiment and a lot of researcher hours at risk.
Once that box of DMEM arrives, refrigeration at 2°C to 8°C is more than a good idea; it’s a rule that keeps the medium reliable. Glucose, l-glutamine, and other additives break down with heat, and color changes can signal trouble before you even open the cap. The risk of microbial growth shoots up if bottles linger too long at room temperature. My own run-ins with ruined media always led back to a forgotten package left out at the lab’s door. Cold storage preserves more than money—it keeps experiments on track.
Exposure to light threatens sensitive nutrients like folic acid and some vitamins. The phenol red in DMEM also reacts to light, fading or turning shades that can scare a researcher into thinking something worse occurred. I learned early not to trust a bottle left near a window or under bright bench lamps. Simple storage in dark, opaque, or covered refrigerators avoids these headaches and keeps results trustworthy. Foil-wrapped bottles may look odd but often make the difference during long study periods.
Every lab veteran can recall tossing out a bottle of DMEM past its expiration date because someone hoped to “squeeze out one more experiment.” Silly thrift never pays when it comes to cell cultures. Most unopened bottles, when kept chilled and protected, hold up well until the expiration stamped by the supplier. Once opened, the risk grows quickly. Sterility slips and even a small amount of contamination—cloudiness, floating specs, changes in color—spell ruined samples and wasted weeks of work. Using aseptic technique and never double-dipping with pipettes protects the stock solution.
Forgetting to refrigerate DMEM or leaving it in the light happens, especially in a crowded lab. Investing in dedicated refrigerators, installing unofficial “do not store food” signs, and creating checklists for media prep days all help. Many labs label bottles with open dates and use a strict rotation to finish older stock first. Extra vigilance around busy times pays off; one missed step can sabotage months of planning.
Most problems with DMEM have far less to do with the media’s formula and more to do with basic storage shortcuts. Each researcher who treats their media supplies with care stands to benefit from smoother experiments, reliable results, and much less time wasted on troubleshooting. The lesson is simple: consistent cold, low-light conditions, clean handling, and respect for expiration mean fewer bad surprises in the incubator and fewer headaches for everyone at the bench.
In cell culture labs everywhere, DMEM high glucose often lands on the shelf as a convenient go-to. The large crowd of researchers tends to reach for this medium with the logic that faster cell growth makes for better experiments. After spending years in shared incubators and peering at Petri dishes under microscopes, I’ve realized that convenience sometimes overshadows smart cell culture choices. DMEM, or Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle Medium, comes in several flavors, but high glucose stands out because it promises turbocharged cell proliferation.
Many cell types, including popular lines like HeLa and HEK293, thrive in the high sugar environment. More glucose translates to more fuel for glycolysis, which means rapid cell division and healthy-looking cultures—at least, on the surface. But each cell line has its quirks and secret needs. Rushing to use high glucose for every cell culture is a bit like watering all your garden plants with the same amount, no matter their actual needs.
Some primary cells, such as neurons or pancreatic beta cells, react differently to an excess of glucose. Researchers have seen that too much sugar can push cells into metabolic stress, trigger oxidative damage, or even change the way genes express themselves. I’ve watched perfectly healthy-looking neurons start acting odd after switching to high-glucose DMEM. They sent out fewer dendrites and simply looked unhappy. Those signs suggested the medium was overwhelming their normal metabolism.
Studies back up this hands-on observation. Elevated glucose can cause oxidative stress in certain stem cell populations and disrupt normal differentiation. Glucose spikes mimic diabetic conditions, making high-glucose DMEM valuable for studying disease, but risky for growing sensitive cells. In immune research, macrophages grown in high-glucose settings shift their cytokine profiles and alter their response to pathogens.
Cell medium is more than a calorie source. Glucose supports quick energy, but other ingredients—amino acids, vitamins, minerals—play just as important a role. In my experience, a culture’s health hinges on the right mix, not just more of one ingredient. Just as athletes need a balanced diet, cells function best with nutrients tailored to their lineage and application.
Some labs adapt their culture strategies by running comparative tests. For example, they grow split cultures of the same cell type in both high and low DMEM glucose levels. They measure proliferation, metabolic activity, and look for changes in protein or gene expression. Such practical confirmation comes before scaling up experiments or investing in costly reagents.
Successful research depends on matching the medium to the cellular job at hand. Before stocking DMEM high glucose by the case, researchers should consider the literature and even the original method papers that describe their cell lines. Documenting growth patterns, keeping records of cell behavior under different conditions, and sharing observations within the lab sharpens best practices. Details matter. Even commonly used lines, if grown under the wrong conditions, can drift over time and show confusing phenotypes.
Culture work asks for a bit of humility. Instead of thinking in shortcuts, it pays off to respect the complexity of cell biology and experiment with different forms of DMEM. The right medium choice improves reproducibility, protects unique cellular traits, and sparks better science.
Anyone working in a cell biology lab will recognize DMEM High Glucose as one of the staple cell culture media options. It's often the first thing fresh graduate students learn to prepare when starting tissue culture work. Every bottle seems to have a slightly different label. “With phenol red.” “Without phenol red.” “With L-glutamine.” “With sodium pyruvate.” For those actually caring about what’s going into their experiments, reading these labels starts feeling like checking the fine print on food packaging—never quite straightforward.
Most folks know DMEM High Glucose by its pink color, which comes from phenol red. This pH indicator helps researchers notice when cultures become acidic—media turns orange-yellow in acidic conditions and fuchsia in basic environments. For standard cell lines, having phenol red is useful for quick visual checks. But for sensitive experiments, like working with estrogen-responsive cells, phenol red acts as a weak estrogen mimic and sways the results. Companies know this, so you’ll find DMEM High Glucose in both phenol red and phenol red-free formulas.
From my own bench experience, those tiny differences matter a lot. I once spent weeks tracing odd background activity in an estrogen receptor assay, only to realize phenol red had crept in through our “control” medium. Commercial suppliers like Gibco, Corning, and Sigma will usually state right up front: “with phenol red” or “without phenol red.” If it’s important for your work, double-check the catalog.
DMEM High Glucose by default offers 4.5 g/L glucose—a bump up from standard DMEM, made for faster-growing or more demanding cell lines. This higher glucose keeps immortalized lines, like HeLa or HEK293, stocked with enough sugar to race through cell cycles. But what else lands in the bottle?
L-glutamine is often included, since this amino acid doesn’t stay stable for long in solution. Suppliers add fresh L-glutamine just before bottling, giving cells more time to thrive before the bottle expires. Some formulas swap L-glutamine for GlutaMAX (a stabilized version), which resists breakdown and lasts longer in storage.
Sodium pyruvate shows up in a few mixes as an extra energy source, useful in oxidative stress or mitochondrial studies—especially when glucose metabolism alone won’t cut it. Standard bottles might not include it, and many protocols spell out whether you need to add it separately.
Then there’s the fiddly problem of vitamins and trace elements. Classic DMEM base covers the basics, but certain cell types crave more. Supplementing with extra non-essential amino acids, albumin, or additional electrolytes happens outside the factory—customization usually falls on the lab. Serum, added at 5-10%, supplies most remaining micronutrients and growth factors.
Buying DMEM High Glucose isn’t one-size-fits-all. Companies produce dozens of formulas targeting niche research needs. Getting the right medium requires more than just grabbing the first pink bottle. Whether you’re studying hormone response or forcing cells down a specific metabolic path, the details on that label deserve close attention.
For anyone starting out in cell culture, reach for the data sheets—manufacturers spell out exactly what they put in each product. Experienced scientists keep track of lot numbers, validate media compositions with certificates of analysis, and even run batch checks for sensitive projects.
The best solution for reproducibility comes from documenting every aspect. Write down the catalog numbers, describe any media supplements in your protocols, check for phenol red, and don’t assume one version fits all projects. Lab work rewards the careful and punishes shortcuts.
| Names | |
| Preferred IUPAC name | 4-(2-hydroxyethyl)-1-piperazineethanesulfonic acid |
| Other names |
DMEM High Glucose Dulbecco’s High Glucose DME High Glucose DMEM HG |
| Pronunciation | /ˈdʌlˌbɛkoʊz ˈmɒdɪˌfaɪd ˈiːɡəlz ˈmiːdiəm/ |
| Identifiers | |
| CAS Number | 12800-058-8 |
| 3D model (JSmol) | 6ZSBWRRLAFYFEO-UHFFFAOYSA-N |
| Beilstein Reference | 3587263 |
| ChEBI | CHEBI:6004 |
| ChEMBL | CHEMBL4307624 |
| ChemSpider | NA |
| DrugBank | DB8861 |
| ECHA InfoCard | 03b00cb9-0000-4c81-b053-8c13eee2c148 |
| EC Number | 319-010-9 |
| Gmelin Reference | 82267 |
| KEGG | C00267 |
| MeSH | Dulbecco's Modified Eagle Medium |
| PubChem CID | 71565261 |
| RTECS number | KT4587E3GM |
| UNII | 212Q9ZZ32R |
| UN number | UN1172 |
| CompTox Dashboard (EPA) | DTXSID4046935 |
| Properties | |
| Chemical formula | C12H22O11 |
| Appearance | red, clear solution |
| Odor | Faint odor |
| Density | 1.005 g/cm³ |
| Solubility in water | Soluble in water |
| log P | -11.2 |
| Acidity (pKa) | 7.4 |
| Magnetic susceptibility (χ) | -8.9×10⁻⁶ |
| Refractive index (nD) | 1.336 to 1.344 |
| Viscosity | Viscous liquid |
| Pharmacology | |
| ATC code | V04CL |
| Hazards | |
| Main hazards | Not hazardous according to GHS classification. |
| GHS labelling | GHS07 |
| Pictograms | GHS07 |
| Signal word | Warning |
| Precautionary statements | P280, P305 + P351 + P338, P337 + P313 |
| NFPA 704 (fire diamond) | NFPA 704: 1-0-0 |
| NIOSH | Not Listed |
| PEL (Permissible) | Not established |
| REL (Recommended) | 500 mL |
| Related compounds | |
| Related compounds |
Amino acids L-glutamine MEM non-essential amino acids Sodium pyruvate DMEM (Low Glucose) RPMI-1640 Medium Fetal Bovine Serum (FBS) Penicillin-Streptomycin |