© 2026 Nanjing Finechem Holdings Co., Ltd,
All Right Reserved
Chromatography has transformed chemical analysis over the past century, and in the middle of this evolution, materials like the Aphera C18 polymer HPLC column played a key role. Scientists didn’t always have access to stable, high-efficiency columns; early work relied on hand-packed silica beds that broke down quickly. The search for more durable, versatile columns came out of frustration with lost samples and short equipment lifetimes. Traditional silica-based C18 columns handled reverse-phase separations well but showed real limitations in high-pH environments or repeated use. Advances in polymer chemistry through the late twentieth century made it possible to replace fragile beds with more rugged polymers. This wasn’t just an incremental improvement. Polymers offered what silica never could: true stability at a broader range of pH values and operational conditions. Aphera’s C18 columns followed in this tradition, answering the call for higher-throughput, longer-lasting columns able to deal with demanding samples and solvents. The introduction of these novel polymer phases shifted methodologies in environmental testing, clinical analysis, and pharmaceutical R&D—not just improving results, but changing the very questions scientists could ask.
The Aphera C18 polymer HPLC column isn’t a niche item. Chromatographers often reach for it when standard silica columns can’t take the heat—both figuratively and literally. Built from a cross-linked polymer backbone, the Aphera C18 starts by addressing the soft spots of legacy columns. The polymer material doesn’t just last longer; it maintains separation performance after repeated runs, so users see less batch-to-batch variation. In day-to-day use, a lot less time goes into troubleshooting and swapping out hardware. As a working chemist, I’ve lost hours wrestling with inconsistent retention times caused by column degradation; polymer-based options like this one cut down on that stress. Laboratories running hundreds of analyses in regulated industries—environmental, food safety, pharmaceuticals—gain stability and reliability. The column’s functionalization with C18 chains enables efficient separation of nonpolar and moderately polar analytes. Unlike some highly engineered, niche products, this one strikes a balance: tough enough for rough work, precise enough for publication-grade analytics.
Polymer-based columns like the Aphera C18 owe much of their advantage to chemistry. The backbone, often poly(styrene-divinylbenzene) or similar, stands strong against acidic, basic, or oxidizing environments. Extra chemical bonds lock the particles together—cross-linking keeps the packed bed from collapsing, leading to impressive mechanical endurance. This level of integrity matters most during long runs, where ordinary columns sometimes bleed impurities or visibly lose packing density. Physical resilience goes hand in hand with chemical inertness. The C18 chains are firmly attached, so the stationary phase resists leaching, even under aggressive solvent gradients or harsh washing steps. Such characteristics let scientists explore a wider range of solvent pH, making the column a tool for problems that would cripple other materials. Pore size, particle diameter, and surface area all come together—fine enough for fast, reproducible separations; spacious enough for compounds from small drugs to larger peptides. The end result is a column that shrugs off conditions that frustrate traditional supports and gives robust performance over months of heavy use.
Labels and technical details don’t exist to fill up spec sheets—they give real meaning in a lab setting. The Aphera C18’s labeling communicates not only compatibility (with instruments, solvents, and pressure limits) but real operational guidance. Pressure ratings, recommended flow rates, particle size range, and optimal pH limits matter every time a method gets written. Compare this to trying to repurpose a column outside its rated range: that often brings loss of resolution, ghost peaks, or worse, catastrophic failure. Detailed labeling on these columns saves time by preventing costly mistakes before they happen. It also streamlines method validation processes in regulated spaces. Laboratories racing through sample queues benefit from knowing exactly what to expect from their setup before injecting a single sample. As someone who’s had to justify method changes to auditors, I know how clear technical documentation turns compliance from a headache into routine.
Production of the Aphera C18 column brings together organic synthesis chemistry with careful engineering. The core process typically polymerizes monomers such as styrene and divinylbenzene, producing a rigid, porous bead. Surface modification, often through grafting or bonding octadecyl (C18) chains, follows with special attention given to reproducibility and coverage. Strict washing and conditioning cycles remove leftover reactants or byproducts. The process always targets a balance between high coverage (for retention) and accessibility (preventing slow mass transfer and peak broadening). Each production step shapes critical column characteristics—batch consistency, pore structure, and phase stability. Those in the business of scaling new methods or developing pharmaceuticals trust processes that eliminate hidden variables. I have worked through plenty of failed method transfers; columns like Aphera’s that deliver reproducibility every batch help readers move from lab trials to real-world analysis without drama.
Stationary phases in HPLC depend on robust surface chemistry. For the Aphera C18, chemical reactions add C18 chains to a strong polymer core. The effectiveness of this modification impacts selectivity and retention time. The surface coverage and the density at which C18 groups pack onto the polymer prove crucial—low coverage means poor separations, too high causes slow flow and poor peak shape. Some labs take customization into their own hands, introducing end-capping agents or embedding special functional groups to tweak the selectivity of the column. Innovative chemists occasionally push these modifications further to meet specialized research needs, combining hydrophobic and hydrophilic groups for mixed-mode separations. The ability to adjust surface chemistry hands more control to analysts, letting them optimize performance for their unique sample matrices. Success often hinges on that control—method developers pressed to resolve complex samples don’t accept “good enough,” and columns built for modification give them a solution.
“C18 column” gets tossed around a lot, but in this context, not every C18 means the same thing. Aphera C18 polymer HPLC columns might get labeled as reverse-phase C18, ODS (octadecylsilane) polymeric columns, or hydrophobic polymer RP columns. Some companies push proprietary trade names, but the chemistry under the hood matters most. As method development grows more complex, analysts should be wary of assuming all “C18 columns” will behave identically, especially across manufacturers or support types. The polymer backbone sets Aphera’s products apart from those based on traditional silica, and that distinction shapes performance, durability, and application space. Seeing the variability between two “C18” columns in a trial drive that fact home; method transfer headaches usually stem from these subtle but significant differences. Researchers should always dig into technical descriptions, not just go by a familiar product name.
Safety standards in chromatography address risks that sometimes go overlooked. Packing pressure, solvent compatibility, and temperature ratings show up on safety sheets for a reason. The polymer foundation of Aphera C18 columns also offers a measure of protection: no fine silica dust to worry about inhaling, and compatibility with a wider range of solvents reduces chemical surprises. A tough column might protect against needle clogging and catastrophic leaks, both of which can ruin a day and sometimes an analysis. Good columns aren’t just workhorses for separations—they safeguard investments in equipment and keep the workflow clean. Labs working under regulatory standards such as ISO or GLP benefit from these safety margins; fewer unexpected breakdowns mean less wasted sample, less downtime, and fewer chances of non-compliance. I’ve seen labs burned by sudden column failures mid-validation—experiences which cemented my respect for robust hardware.
The Aphera C18 column’s versatility encourages adoption across sectors. Environmental labs use it for tracing pesticides in drinking water or soil—a task once complicated by column degradation and matrix effects. Food safety scientists rely on it to separate residues in complex samples. In pharmaceutical quality control, its consistent retention and selectivity help track impurities, active ingredients, and degradation products in finished drugs. Peptide chemists can push column life much further, especially during purification of hydrophobic peptides that tend to ruin other beds. Not every laboratory task lines up neatly with product categories; real-world samples throw up challenges around pH, solvent strength, and throughput. The Aphera C18 keeps its edge under these pressures, making it the default choice for analysts who have to trust their separations day after day. This widespread applicability reflects feedback from users tired of cutting corners or making apologies for inferior equipment.
Progress in HPLC column technology doesn’t slow down. R&D around the Aphera C18 focuses on pushing the boundaries—higher throughput, even longer lifetime, sharper separations, and controlled selectivity. Current projects look at further optimizing polymer structure, adjusting pore architecture, and experimenting with mixed-mode phases. Real scientists play a major part in this feedback loop, communicating pain points and performance gaps directly to developers. Demands from biopharma and environmental sectors, especially, push R&D teams to refine phase chemistries that handle both small molecules and large biopolymers without losing resolution. Migration into two-dimensional LC and hyphenated techniques (such as LC-MS) drives continued exploration of phase stability under even harsher conditions. The Aphera C18’s longevity in the market depends on this investment—there is nothing static about real analytical challenges, and the best manufacturers partner with users to keep pace.
Polymers used in chromatographic columns don’t have the same toxicity concerns as many silica dusts or functionalized supports. The cross-linked polymer backbone resists leaching, so the risk to both operators and samples stays low. Published studies track extractables and leachables during repeated operation, supporting claims of low sample contamination and safe use. In regulated industries, ongoing toxicity research underpins acceptance for pharmaceutical or environmental analysis. The Aphera C18’s clean performance profile allows analysts to focus on the compounds they want to track instead of worrying about background interference or toxic byproducts. In cases where sample purity underpins public health or scientific progress, this matters more than almost any other feature. Having spent years in labs where contamination kept creeping into blank runs, I can say the assurances that come with polymer columns feel like a real service to the scientific community.
Looking forward, the future for columns like the Aphera C18 points toward greater adaptability and smarter integration with automated workflows. Customization of surface chemistry and column format will increase, letting users tailor separations for ultra-complex samples or emerging contaminants. As analytical science pushes into newer forms of omics and real-time monitoring, columns have to keep up—not just as passive parts, but as engineered solutions capable of dynamic adjustment. Advances in polymer design (from nanostructuring to hybrid co-polymers) hold the promise of columns that master both speed and selectivity, while reducing waste and environmental impact. In my experience, the most reliable tools stick around, but always keep evolving—the Aphera C18 sets a strong example of what the next generation of HPLC columns could, and should, deliver to science.
Everyone in the analytical chemistry game knows that HPLC columns shape results. It’s tough to get reliable peaks from poor materials. The Aphera C18 Polymer HPLC Column steps up with some serious benefits—especially for those who want both flexibility and consistent outcomes.
This column doesn’t use traditional silica. Instead, it uses a high-purity, robust polymer base. From my own lab days, polymer columns hold up in conditions where regular silica packs it in. Picture a column that shrugs off high pH and tough solvents. That’s what you get here.
Polymer-based columns solve real headaches in QA and research labs. Extended pH range supports tricky separations, especially peptides and basic drugs. I’ve seen projects stall when silica columns bleed or dissolve in harsh mobile phases. That’s where Aphera’s C18 polymer design steps in and keeps the workflow moving. In biopharma, the longer lifespan cuts replacement costs.
The column’s efficiency matches up with demanding regulatory environments. Suppliers report efficiency in the 70,000–100,000 plates per meter range. That means tight, reliable peaks, essential for proper quantitation. I recall trying to validate methods with underperforming columns—time wasted on reruns because the equipment couldn't deliver. Having a column with solid efficiency cuts that grief.
Proper use needs careful sample preparation and the right mobile phase selection. Avoiding strong acids—unless really needed—prolongs even the best polymer column's life. Flushing with mild solvents between runs keeps fouling at bay. Integration with UHPLC brings new efficiency, but only if the system’s plumbing and detectors can match the pressure this column endures.
Strong specifications mean little without the right application. Workhorse columns like the Aphera C18 Polymer are upgrading chromatography for tough methods and new drug entities. In my own experience, that translates to less troubleshooting, less downtime, and more solid data—something every lab tech and scientist can appreciate.
Anyone who’s worked in the lab understands the daily challenge: choosing the right column for the job. The Aphera C18 Polymer HPLC Column often lands on the list for method development, especially if you’re running into trouble with traditional silica-based columns. The reason comes down to resilience and versatility. I’ve learned through hands-on experience how C18 polymer technology keeps workflow steady and results sharp—essential qualities for complex or sensitive samples.
The hydrophobic nature of a C18 polymer surface fits well for separating small-molecule drugs, peptides, and a host of natural products. Some of my work has involved extracting active pharmaceutical ingredients from plant matrices, which usually contain lots of sticky or highly polar elements. Silica columns can break down when exposed to strong bases or acids, and polar modifiers don’t always help. In contrast, the Aphera C18 Polymer HPLC Column keeps its shape under a wider range of pH and temperature conditions. This opens the door for basic or acidic samples, and for solvents like water, acetonitrile, or methanol, no matter how harsh the run conditions get.
Proteins, peptides, and metabolites rarely appear in isolation. In clinical or environmental analysis, samples might come from plasma, urine, or soil. These sources bring along fats, salts, and proteins that clog up traditional silica. Polymer-based C18 architecture resists fouling, which keeps results consistent run after run. One project on water pollutants made this clear: run after run, the polymer-based C18 kept going without losing resolution or pressure, even as matrix effects piled on.
Certain research questions call for extended pH gradients or high-temperature environments. The Aphera C18 Polymer HPLC Column holds together from pH 1 to 14, letting you use reagents or buffers that would destroy silica supports. For anyone running stability studies on basic pharmaceuticals or working with bio-samples that require deproteinization using strong acids, this broader range provides better data and longer column life. In peptide mapping—where samples might see temperature spikes and chemical extremes—the difference becomes very clear, as columns last much longer and performance stays high.
With polymers as the backbone, these C18 columns can handle not just small molecules but some oversized molecules, too. Oligonucleotides, peptides, and certain synthetic polymers often stick or degrade on silica but elute cleanly from a polymer-based surface. When doing trace-level impurity analysis in raw drug products or digging into unknowns in food safety, this compatibility cuts down on background signals and supports more accurate quantitation.
Green chemistry and safer solvents keep gaining ground. Many labs cut back on organic solvents, so a column that handles 100% aqueous phases matters more and more. The Aphera polymer doesn’t collapse in pure water, sidestepping a classic headache in reversed-phase HPLC. This helps both in method validation and routine QC, since you don’t need to constantly babysit the column between runs with organic washes.
There’s always pressure for reproducibility. The resilience of these columns translates into fewer changes during method transfer, less downtime, and steadier results across laboratories. For anyone sending methods to other sites or dealing with regulatory submissions, this steadiness is valuable. Fewer surprises mean fewer re-runs and more trust in the final results.
With polymer-based C18 HPLC columns like Aphera, the lab gains freedom for method development, more room to tackle tricky samples, and a longer-lasting tool for the endless parade of analysis challenges. From everyday pharmaceutical QC to advanced omics or environmental trace work, versatility and reliability all hang on the right column choice.
Aphera C18 polymer columns do a lot of heavy lifting in the lab. After weeks of repeated sample injections and buffer flushes, residue builds up. This build-up doesn't just mess with retention times—it robs separation and sensitivity. From my own time in chromatography, a well-maintained column delivers consistent data set after set. On the flip side, neglect invites baseline noise, ghost peaks, and sudden pressure spikes. A short burst of regular upkeep keeps budgets in check and experiments on track.
Rinsing columns isn’t about sticking to a strict routine; it’s about paying close attention to run results and injector histories. For everyday cleaning, I use a mix of high-purity water and an organic solvent like acetonitrile or methanol. After each set, flushing the system with 20–30 column volumes of water can chase away buffer salts and loosely bound material. Then, running another 20 column volumes of 100% acetonitrile dissolves stubborn organics. It’s a reliable approach for most reversed-phase applications.
Sometimes, protein or lipid fouling calls for something stronger. I reach for a solution of acetonitrile and a splash of isopropanol—maybe even a gentle detergent like 0.1% TFA if things get greasy. Flushing slowly works best; ramping the flow too quickly can create channeling or delaminate the polymer bed.
High backpressure suggests aggregated junk in the bed. Don’t wait for pressure alarms—track this metric each week and compare to your column’s starting value. If washing with hot solvents doesn’t clear it, reversing flow through the column works in a pinch to dislodge packed-in debris, but keep flow rates modest. I've rescued more than one column this way, but only if I acted before things got out of hand.
Gray peaks or carryover between samples often ties back to leftover analytes. Running a gradient wash, ramping from water to pure acetonitrile, cleans out trapped hydrophobic residues. If complex samples still cause issues, dedicating a guard column catches a surprising amount of the mess.
Good habits start before the injection. I only run samples filtered through 0.22 μm membranes. Even the highest-grade columns can’t tolerate repeated injections of particulate-laden extracts. Each Friday, I park the column in 50–70% acetonitrile to stop microbial growth; storing in water breeds mold.
Logbooks make life easier. I jot down solvent used, pressure readings, and any signs of drift. When performance drops, checking these notes points me to sources—a forgotten buffer, a patterned build-up, or stretching the column past its ideal pH range.
Most polymer C18 columns handle a wider pH range than silica-based types. Still, they prefer stability: jumpy pH changes or sudden solvent swings knock years off their lifespan. I plan method changes in gentle steps and let the system equilibrate after each.
Even the toughest columns deserve planned replacements after thousands of runs. Cleaning extends working life, but magic doesn’t last forever. I reckon any investment in careful cleaning and thoughtful storage returns real value—saving clicks in the purchase order system and headaches by the bench.
Choosing the best operating conditions for a high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) column shapes how well separation and detection work in the lab. Plenty of chemists, including me, have underestimated the impact of flow rate and pressure on column life and chromatographic clarity until run-after-run troubleshooting leads the lesson home.
With polymer-based C18 columns like the Aphera, you get some unique strengths over silica material—higher chemical stability and easy transitions between pH extremes. That flexibility only helps if the setup matches what the column can handle. The recommended flow rate typically falls between 0.2 to 1.0 mL/min for a standard 4.6 mm internal diameter column. For analytical tasks, settling around 0.5 to 0.7 mL/min keeps components resolving sharply without cranking backpressure into risky territory.
Pressure can stress both the packing inside the column and the polymer backbone itself. Most genuine Aphera C18 columns can take up to 400 bar (about 5800 psi). Once pressures creep above this, channeling, leaks, and even permanent deformation can show up, especially when running viscous mobile phases or temperature programs. Day-to-day, aiming for up to 250 bar gives a solid safety margin. If system pressure starts rising, extra cleaning or replacing inlet frits saves you a lot of future pain.
Some folks assume running faster—cranking up the flow—speeds up the whole analysis linearly. It does cut time, but the gain never matches the tradeoff in resolution you lose and the stress you add to both the pump and column. I once tried pushing 1.5 mL/min in a hurry. The column lasted less than half its normal lifespan, and samples later showed baseline drift—an expensive lesson in patience.
Watch how your pump responds at different mobile phase compositions. A higher percentage of organic solvent drops the backpressure, so you can use the lower end of your flow rate range safely. Buffer-heavy aqueous phases push pressures up, so drop closer to the minimum recommended flow. Always let the mobile phase fully degas; trapped air bubbles have caused strange shifts in pressure that didn’t show in even careful method development tests.
Laboratory teams often overlook how consistent column care simplifies troubleshooting. Regularly flushing the column with pure water then with the strongest solvent helps remove lingering contaminants that increase pressure over time. Never store the column in just water. The polymer stationary phase keeps its capacity far longer if stored with a high fraction of organic solvent.
Keep a logbook for every column. Note flow rates used, pressure readings at the start of each run, and mobile phase compositions. Small changes caught in that log can warn about frit blockage or fouling before you lose an important batch of data.
Sometimes, sample complexity, high salt, or proteins make columns clog sooner than expected. In those tough situations, pre-columns or guard cartridges shield the main column and minimize the risk of losing an expensive investment. Proper filtration—nothing fancy, just syringe filters or 0.45μm spin filters—before injection can make all the difference.
For labs working with unusual pH or aggressive solvents, checking the specific column documentation for updated limits makes sense. Manufacturers update their protocols based on real lab experience, so these details usually reflect common pitfalls.
The Aphera C18 Polymer HPLC Column rewards careful attention to flow and pressure. Slightly slower, well-documented runs will almost always produce cleaner separations, longer-lasting columns, and fewer surprises. Small habits—regular logbooks, using proper mobile phases, respecting the recommended range—turn into solid productivity and reliable data over time.
Anyone spending time around a busy chromatography lab knows how strongly chemists swear by their C18 columns. But walking past those benches lately, a new contender pops up: the Aphera C18 Polymer HPLC Column. At first glance, this doesn’t look like the gear you’ll find in an undergraduate’s starter kit. The shift from silica-based to polymer-based packing material raises eyebrows—and questions.
Silica-based C18 columns have built research empires. Their particle uniformity and reliable surface chemistry deliver great peak shapes for small molecules. Still, relentless use in challenging matrices—high pH, proteins, biofluids—leads to deterioration. Silica bonds break down outside of certain pH windows, usually between pH 2 and 8. Anyone in proteomics or clinical chemistry has watched expensive columns foul after weeks of running crude lysates or tough pharmaceutical samples. Once the silica breaks apart, back pressure jumps. Chunks can clog the plumbing.
Polymer-based options like Aphera C18 challenge these weak spots. Their structure avoids siloxane bonds, which means the pH window swings much wider, sometimes from 1 to 13. That means you can tackle basic compounds without worrying about a column’s death at alkaline conditions, or see your peak shape drift when buffer composition shifts. This kind of stability becomes invaluable in method development, especially for companies releasing products in tight timeframes. Longevity can cut real costs—less downtime, fewer panicked calls to vendors, less time spent re-validating methods.
Any chromatographer values predictability. Silica tanks with extended use, but across batches, most manufacturers keep quality tight. Yet, drift exists, and variability can tank an entire data set. Polymers offer another route. The Aphera C18 packing comes engineered for consistent lot performance, partly due to how the base polymer gets manufactured and functionalized. Scientists report sharper reproducibility run-to-run and column-to-column—a huge deal when regulatory agencies start combing through validation data.
Let’s talk about separation itself. Silica-based C18 columns shine for classic reversed-phase HPLC. They pull crisp peak shapes with well-characterized small drug molecules or peptides. Polymers initially lagged—broadening peaks for hydrophobic compounds, or offering less resolution. But developments like Aphera’s new functionalization process close that gap. Many labs now report nearly indistinguishable separations for small molecules. The hydrophobic surface binds just as efficiently, and selectivity matches old favorites for a surprising range of analytes.
Pressure tolerance is another overlooked trait. Polymer beads pack tightly, but swelling can pose issues for early columns. Aphera C18 sidesteps this with cross-linking techniques, letting the column handle high flow rates with less risk of changing its structure during repeated use. Fast gradients become less daunting, and preparative scale purification benefits, allowing much larger sample volumes without a drop in performance.
In my team’s projects with antibody–drug conjugates, we faced endless fouling and short lifespans with silica material. Switching to Aphera’s polymer design more than doubled the operational lifetime. The columns ran through aggressive wash cycles and saw harsh matrix components. Beyond reliability, we saw less frequent column replacement and smoother handoff between regulated runs. That extra stability may not show up as an obvious line item on a budget spreadsheet, but project managers appreciate workflows that just keep running.
Polymer columns come at a higher up-front price, but their longevity and versatility often pay that back. For labs handling diverse applications, or wanting to simplify training and inventory, moving away from silica can be freeing. Problems with certain hydrophobic analytes or challenging regulatory requirements may still warrant a good old-fashioned silica C18, but Aphera’s approach moves the field forward.
It’s not about throwing tradition away, but about picking the right tool for modern challenges and building confidence in results. Polymer C18 columns like Aphera deliver an edge for labs seeking reliability and resilience in a fast-changing analytical world.
| Names | |
| Preferred IUPAC name | poly(octadecylsiloxane) |
| Other names |
Aphera C18 Column Aphera C18 HPLC Column Aphera Polymer C18 Column |
| Pronunciation | /əˈfɪə.rə siː eɪˈtiːn ˈpɒl.ɪ.mər eɪtʃ piː ɛl siː ˈkɒl.əm/ |
| Identifiers | |
| CAS Number | 181826-46-8 |
| Beilstein Reference | 4926740 |
| ChEBI | CHEBI:60004 |
| ChEMBL | CHEMBL2108508 |
| ChemSpider | No ChemSpider entry exists for the product 'Aphera C18 Polymer HPLC Column'. |
| DrugBank | DB13751 |
| ECHA InfoCard | The product "Aphera C18 Polymer HPLC Column" does not have a specific 'ECHA InfoCard' because InfoCards are assigned to chemical substances registered under REACH, not to finished products or columns. |
| EC Number | APH200005 |
| Gmelin Reference | The product 'Aphera C18 Polymer HPLC Column' does not have a 'Gmelin Reference'. |
| KEGG | kegg:C18627 |
| MeSH | D020345 |
| PubChem CID | 129701 |
| UNII | 5WJ2N65R4F |
| UN number | Not regulated |
| CompTox Dashboard (EPA) | DTXSID5040345 |
| Properties | |
| Chemical formula | (C8H8)n |
| Appearance | Column with stainless steel body, white end fittings, and product label indicating 'Aphera C18 Polymer HPLC Column' and specifications. |
| Odor | Odorless |
| Density | 0.67 g/cm³ |
| Solubility in water | Insoluble in water |
| log P | 3.0 |
| Acidity (pKa) | 6.5 |
| Basicity (pKb) | 7.7 |
| Refractive index (nD) | 1.52 |
| Viscosity | 6 cP |
| Dipole moment | 0.00 D |
| Pharmacology | |
| ATC code | C18 |
| Hazards | |
| Main hazards | May cause respiratory irritation. |
| GHS labelling | GHS labelling: Not classified as hazardous according to GHS. |
| Pictograms | Wash hands, Wear gloves, Eye protection, Fume hood, Avoid sunlight, Storage temperature 2-8°C |
| Signal word | Warning |
| Hazard statements | No hazard statements. |
| Precautionary statements | Precautionary statements: Not a hazardous substance or mixture according to Regulation (EC) No. 1272/2008. |
| NFPA 704 (fire diamond) | NFPA 704: 0-0-0 |
| REL (Recommended) | 4.6 x 250 mm, 5 µm |
| Related compounds | |
| Related compounds |
Aphera C8 Polymer HPLC Column Aphera Phenyl Polymer HPLC Column Aphera CN Polymer HPLC Column Aphera Amide Polymer HPLC Column Aphera Polar Polymer HPLC Column |
