© 2026 Nanjing Finechem Holdings Co., Ltd,
All Right Reserved
Long before lab coats and high-tech chemistry labs took over, plant researchers noticed that certain natural compounds seemed to have almost magical effects on plant growth. Folks tried everything, from compost teas to extracts, to make crops healthier and more productive. The story behind 6-(γ,γ-Dimethylallylamino)purine, more commonly known by its shorter names like 2iP or isopentenyladenine, fits right into this broader quest. Discovered in the mid-20th century in the hunt for substances that boost cell division, it joined the class of cytokinins, a group now woven into the fabric of agricultural and plant biology research. Scientists spent years extracting, modifying, and tinkering with these molecules, fascinated by their uncanny ability to coax plant tissues into multiplying. Even now, the research keeps turning up fresh reasons to revisit the chemistry of cytokinins, and 2iP remains a familiar friend in plant labs.
2iP doesn’t always grab headlines, yet it's been a silent workhorse behind countless advances in plant biotechnology. Not only does it speed up cell growth, its ability to prompt callus formation and shoot multiplication has made it a go-to tool for tissue culture labs worldwide. People have spent decades learning just how much to use, in what form, and in which species, making it as much a tool of craftsmanship as a product of science. Its applications extend beyond research, touching large-scale agriculture projects, conservation work, forestry, and even select pharmaceutical explorations. Still, it’s the basic promise — to help plants reach their potential — that draws researchers and growers alike to this molecule.
Anyone who’s handled 2iP in the lab remembers its pale, almost chalky crystalline form. It’s not as easy to dissolve in water as some of its cytokinin cousins, often needing a bit of an acid adjustment or vigorous stirring to coax it into solution. Chemically, it sports a purine ring with a dimethylallylamino side chain, the feature that gives it its unique punch when interacting with biological receptors. That simple twist in its side chain compared to basic adenine makes all the difference — a great example of how a small change at the molecular level can shift an entire field of research. Stable under the right lab conditions but sensitive to light and high heat, 2iP teaches a bit of respect for careful chemical handling.
Any scientist who’s used 2iP knows to trust their supplier but still double-checks the labeling. Purity usually tops 98%, a crucial point since even small contaminants can muddle the results in tissue culture work. The product arrives well-sealed, often with batch records, lot numbers, and expiration dates to track stability. Storage guidelines don’t leave much wiggle room — it fares best in dry, dark, cool spots, away from acids and bases that could break its structure down too soon. Labels highlight its use as a research chemical, not approved for use in humans or food crops without regulatory clearance. These details matter because too many ambitious grad students have watched their experiments go sideways after overlooked storage notes or misunderstood solubility quirks.
Lab teams usually start from scratch with a bottle of dry 2iP, measuring it out carefully, dissolving it in a bit of dilute acid (like just a few drops of HCl), then bringing up the volume with distilled water. This careful prep captures a lesson that’s true across science: small mistakes with strong chemicals multiply quickly. In more industrial settings, synthesis runs from adenine starting material via alkylation — a reliable, well-characterized process, but not one to tackle lightly. Even a small slip with reactants or purification can throw off the purity. My own time in a college tissue culture lab taught me early that attention to these basics spells the difference between clean, thriving callus and weeks of frustrated troubleshooting.
The interesting thing about 2iP is how flexible the molecule becomes in enterprising hands. Its purine core allows for straightforward modifications, letting chemists craft analogs with more punch or better absorption in specific species. Researchers have built on the basic backbone to create derivatives tuned for slow release, improved uptake, or resistance to enzymatic breakdown. Reaction sites on the ring system open up a world of exploration for students of organic chemistry. Despite its age, this molecule still inspires syntheses in journals that tweak its side chain to solve new biological puzzles. Cycles of chemical creativity like this show that the progress in biology has never been separate from advances in synthetic chemistry.
No matter the country or supplier, 2iP recognizes a cluster of names: 6-(γ,γ-Dimethylallylamino)purine, N6-(2-Isopentenyl)adenine, isopentenyladenine. Although chemists keep the IUPAC heavy at hand for accuracy, students and researchers use the shorter names to smooth daily conversations. These synonyms ease the sharing of protocols and findings from lab to lab. In markets, suppliers often stick with “2iP” or “isopentenyl adenine”, both to keep things simple and to keep confusion with similar cytokinins at bay. This loose network of names reflects the real-world way science gets done — sometimes informal, always needing clarity.
Lab handling of 2iP asks for level-headed care, never panic or guesswork. Safety data sheets give the basics, urging gloves, goggles, and well-ventilated benches. Direct exposure brings risks like mild skin and eye irritation, so even the most confident chemist avoids shortcuts. Waste heads into proper chemical bins; open bottles never linger under fluorescent lights or out in summer heat. Standard practice counts for a lot, since close, repeated contact compounds risk. It matters that all staff read the guidelines — a standard I hold onto after seeing too many dangerous improvisations during rushed experiments. Respecting these rules isn’t red tape; it’s the only way essential research keeps moving without accidents that ruin someone’s day or worse.
Plant tissue culture takes the trophy for the main user of 2iP. The compound makes a world of difference in micropropagation, letting growers multiply hard-to-breed species, rescue endangered plants, or produce uniform lines for agriculture. Ornamental horticulture leans on 2iP for reliable, speedy shoot formation in varieties that would otherwise take years to establish. Forestry labs use it to propagate disease-resistant or drought-tolerant stock, an approach that scales up genetic gains for reforestation. Sometimes, pharmaceutical researchers recruit 2iP-regulated plant cultures to churn out valuable compounds that wild plants yield only in fits and starts. In all these settings, the substance quietly pushes plant science forward, opening doors to food security, species preservation, and new bioactive products.
Modern R&D with 2iP never rests. After decades of culture work, scientists still hunt for combinations that lift productivity or reduce costs. New formulations and delivery systems are in the pipeline: researchers test encapsulation techniques that slow-release cytokinins in field conditions, while molecular biologists engineer crops with better receptor fit for these compounds. Long-term studies dig into how repeated applications affect plant epigenetics and resistance profiles. The search for improved analogs keeps chemistry departments busy, especially for crops with unique cytokinin sensitivities. Collaborations across disciplines spark new uses, linking plant biologists, chemists, and agricultural engineers. Funding agencies continue to back projects focusing on sustainable agriculture, so the pipeline for 2iP-based innovations feels far from dry.
Work with any growth regulator means balancing potential against safety, and 2iP is no exception. Available toxicology reports flag its low acute toxicity for plants and animals at the concentrations typically used in labs and greenhouses. Still, curious researchers stay vigilant — chronic exposure studies are limited, and ecological impacts in open settings need close watching. Concerns about off-target effects, especially at higher doses, highlight the need for careful application protocols. Most guidelines suggest strict containment and waste management to avoid environmental spills or unintended plant exposure. Insights from toxicology help shape not only lab routines but also regulatory standards, protecting both workers and ecosystems. Regular training and updated literature reviews keep everyone one step ahead of surprises.
Looking down the road, 2iP’s future hangs on creative problem-solving. Researchers face field-scale challenges: how to deliver cytokinins efficiently across sprawling fields, how to tweak plant responses without constant chemical input, and how to combine this tool with new genetic technologies. Sustainable agriculture puts a premium on less waste, so formulations that last longer in soil or break down benignly after use get special attention. Advances in genomics and biotechnology open up precise applications, moving from broad stimulation to species-specific, even tissue-specific treatments. Universities, startups, and global research institutes will keep testing the boundaries, eager to push 2iP into roles nobody imagined fifty years ago. With the right balance of old-fashioned lab caution and new curiosity, this molecule could play a part in feeding more people, restoring ecosystems, and supplying health science with cleaner plant-derived products.
Walking through any greenhouse or advanced agricultural site, it’s easy to forget the chemistry quietly shaping what grows and how fast. One key player that’s been earning attention among researchers and growers is 6-(γ,γ-Dimethylallylamino)purine, better known as a synthetic cytokinin. This compound nudges plants to develop, steer resources, and even tolerate stress. For anyone who follows plant science, the name starts to pop up in studies from tissue culture to large-scale farming.
6-(γ,γ-Dimethylallylamino)purine works by mimicking natural hormones called cytokinins found in plants. These hormones drive cell division and push shoot formation. For growers raising crops in controlled conditions – orchids, bananas, potatoes, or ornamental flowers – propagating plants from small tissue samples saves time and money. This synthetic cytokinin gets mixed into culture media, helping calluses form shoots more efficiently. Some plant varieties that refuse to budge with other treatments start to grow with it. Experienced growers swear by its ability to keep plantlets healthy and vigorous.
Modern agriculture faces unpredictable weather, soil degradation, and new pest threats. In my own experience talking with agronomists, the pressure always comes down to saving a harvest. Research shows that 6-(γ,γ-Dimethylallylamino)purine helps crops handle stress from drought and salinity. When sprayed at key stages, plants show less wilting, keep chlorophyll production up, and bounce back faster. During seasons marked by long dry spells, some farmers report not only surviving crops but surprising gains in yield. No chemical replaces careful management, but this growth regulator offers another line of defense.
Cytokinins don’t just encourage cell division – they keep plants from aging too quickly. In crops like wheat, rice, or even leafy vegetables, this means more tillers or shoots, wider leaves, and heavier seed heads. 6-(γ,γ-Dimethylallylamino)purine has shown the ability to slow down yellowing leaf tissue in trials, giving plants more time to fill their grains or fruit. Real-world results can change from field to field, but harnessing this hormone sometimes lets growers squeeze more value from each square meter of land.
Like all powerful tools, growth regulators should never be used blindly. Over-application risks unwanted side effects: abnormal growth patterns, residues in harvested food, or pressure on local ecosystems. The World Health Organization and agricultural agencies have guidelines and recommended doses. Experienced consultants remind growers to combine scientific data with careful on-site trials, always checking local regulations.
Plant biologists keep digging into how 6-(γ,γ-Dimethylallylamino)purine changes gene expression and interacts with other hormones. While commercialization has been slow in some regions, especially where rules on new agrochemicals run tight, global research keeps unlocking new uses. Whether someone is growing rare orchids in a lab or keeping staple crops alive through heat and drought, paying attention to this little molecule can give them a real edge. In hands that respect both tradition and innovation, cytokinins like this one are more than chemicals on a shelf—they’re part of the future of food and sustainable agriculture.
Looking at 6-(γ,γ-Dimethylallylamino)purine, you see a name that packs plenty of information and a few clues. The “purine” at the end lays out the backbone—those familiar fused rings you might recognize from names like adenine or guanine, which play big roles in DNA. 6-(γ,γ-Dimethylallylamino) tells us something special got tacked onto the sixth position of that base structure.
Purines themselves are two-ring structures: a six-membered pyrimidine ring fused to a five-membered imidazole. In this case, scientists swapped out a hydrogen from the sixth spot for a γ,γ-dimethylallylamino group. Peeling this apart, γ,γ-dimethylallylamino is a nitrogen atom holding onto a dimethylallyl side chain. To paint a mental picture: that chain is a three-carbon skeleton, double-bonded at one end, and capped by two methyl groups stuck to the third carbon.
The science doesn’t just stay on the page—it shows up on lab benches and in greenhouses. Known in shorthand as 6-DMAP or 6-Dimethylallylaminopurine, this compound grabs attention for good reason. It joins the family of cytokinins, which influence plant cell division, shoot initiation, and delays in leaf aging. Results from decades of greenhouse trials prove plants show stronger shoots or more vigorous branching after treatment with cytokinins like this one.
Digging into the structure, that nitrogen bridge between the purine and the side chain sets the difference between this molecule and the natural cytokinins found inside plant cells. Shifting the groups around or tweaking the structure changes its performance. Researchers studying structure-activity relationships trace every change to see what gives boosts or slows growth.
I’ve watched agronomists pour over plant tissue samples hoping to crack the secret to quicker, denser yields. It turns out, the positioning of a methyl group or the placement of a nitrogen bridge influences not just growth, but how a plant copes under tough field conditions. Details matter—even the length of a side chain or a tiny tweak in molecular layout can shift results.
6-(γ,γ-Dimethylallylamino)purine stands as proof that small molecules hold huge potential. Take the basic purine ring, bolt on a dimethylallyl group through an amino link, and you’ve got a tool with the punch to guide new plant behaviors. The chemical map spells out: C9H13N5. Its structure counts for more than academic curiosity—what chemists see on paper becomes what farmers see in the field.
With potential like this, responsible use demands careful evaluation. The right molecule brings great benefits—stronger shoots, better rooting, improved crop resilience. Still, widespread field studies build the evidence that guides safe application. Every new advance should come with transparency about risks and clear communication between researchers and growers.
The beauty of 6-(γ,γ-Dimethylallylamino)purine rests in the details: a purine backbone, a clever side chain, and the promise of more productive agriculture. Chemistry on the page finds its real value outdoors, in better harvests and sturdier plants. That’s the kind of change you can see, season by season, leaf by leaf.
A stroll through plant biochemistry texts pulls you into a maze of technical names. Take 6-(γ,γ-dimethylallylamino)purine as an example. This chemical formula looks intimidating, and questions pop up the moment it’s mentioned. Some folks wonder: isn’t this just kinetin? Or maybe benzylaminopurine? These doubts even ripple through research labs, not just casual garden circles.
Experience teaches that getting these hormones mixed up leads to serious confusion at the bench or in the field. Kinetin is known as 6-furfurylaminopurine. Its roots trace back to coconut milk research in the 1950s. Kinetin plays a crucial part in tissue culture, sparking shoots to develop where only callus once stood. It prods old leaves to stay greener, and researchers trust it to keep explants alive while cells divide.
Benzylaminopurine wears several names, most folks shorten it to BAP or call it 6-benzylaminopurine. This one shows muscle in plant propagation work. A single pinch can multiply orchids like magic. It’s close to kinetin in behavior but the benzyl group gives it a different punch when placed in culture media.
Now let’s examine this curious long-named compound. 6-(γ,γ-dimethylallylamino)purine doesn’t fit as the real name for either kinetin or benzylaminopurine. Chemists know it better as 6-(dimethylallylamino)purine or isopentenyladenine, usually labeled in the lab as 2iP. This cytokinin floats around inside many plant cells naturally, not like the others that often arrive in a bottle.
2iP shows up during plant growth and bud formation. In the past, it’s helped me coax roots from hardheaded cuttings and encouraged stubborn species to branch out. Unlike BAP or kinetin, 2iP’s molecular side chain comes with a dimethylallyl group, an easy source of confusion if you squint too fast at a chemical structure drawing. But this difference shapes how the molecule signals inside plant tissue.
Confusing 2iP with BAP or kinetin can stall whole projects. Once, a grad student swapped 2iP when the protocol called for BAP. Leaf explants sat stubborn, refusing to throw new shoots. Only fresh media with the intended cytokinin got things rolling again. Errors like this waste time and stretch budgets thin, especially where funds rarely come easy.
Precise labeling and basic chemical literacy shield researchers and growers from headaches. Cytokinins may all boost growth, but not in the same way, and a single switched label spells disaster on a commercial scale. Clear training and honest communication help, too. Not every student knows chemistry, and gardening books don’t always break down hormones by their full chemical names.
Plant biologists could support each other better by crafting guides that line up common names, chemical formulas, and their real-world uses. Such charts would serve both backyard horticulturists and those setting up tissue culture facilities. A little cross-talk between chemists and gardeners would clear up confusion before it ruins a batch. People tend to get farther, faster, when plain language and hands-on evidence meet in the same room.
Walking into a biology or chemistry lab, the clutter of bottles and vials usually blends into the background. But few things stall research quicker than a spoiled reagent. 6-(γ,γ-Dimethylallylamino)purine, known as DAAP or a potent cytokinin analog, can trigger frustration if it turns bad on the shelf. Storage seems simple, but scientists learn the hard way—one unexpected temperature swing, and the next experiment veers off course.
Unlike salt or cheap solvents, DAAP has a bit of a temper. Most vendors ship it as a pale powder—pure, sure, but not as stable as it might look. Heat and moisture can undo months of work or drain research budgets. DAAP, like similar cytokinins and purines, keeps longest in a fridge, sealed against the brutal effects of air and damp lab benches. If you store DAAP at 2-8°C and keep it protected from light, you avoid a lot of headaches. Desiccant packets in the container’s cap help with humidity. Nobody wants to open a vial and find a degraded mess.
Lab results build on trust that the starting materials hold together. Research shows many cytokinins start breaking down above room temperature. Light exposure can speed up this process, too. DAAP oxidizes, losing its punch and muddying up test results. If a batch sees repeated warm-ups and cool-downs, don’t count on reproducibility. This isn’t just a money problem—publishing unreliable data can cost careers or even stop a breakthrough from moving forward.
Labs already juggle enough risks. Shortcuts—like skipping the fridge or sealing a cap without checking for powder inside—invite disaster. I’ve watched researchers struggle with inconsistent cell cultures and growth patterns, only to trace it back to poorly stored cytokinin analogs. Storing DAAP in darkness and a sealed, dry bottle in the fridge works for most bench scientists. For those running massive plant experiments, a minus-20°C freezer stops slow leaks of activity, especially over months.
We don’t always check expiration dates or log every open and close. Still, using DAAP within its recommended period makes everything run smoother. If you work with tiny quantities, splitting the original powder into small, airtight containers cuts down on harmful thaw and refreeze cycles. Simple habits—label every tube with the date received and opened—keep confusion out of the mix. Tracking storage and mixing up a fresh solution when in doubt just protects everybody’s time.
Consulting Sigma-Aldrich or Thermo Fisher websites, you’ll see they recommend cold, dry, and dark storage for DAAP. Literature backs up those vendor instructions—cytokinins keep activity longer under these simple conditions. Peer-reviewed studies report degradation at higher temperatures, and industry guidelines repeat the tough-love: keep air, water, and sunlight away.
Store DAAP—well-sealed, dry, and away from the light—in your lab fridge. Write down the date, use up older material before cracking open a new batch, and don’t let humidity sneak in. Respect the storage details, and you’ll save money, time, and maybe even a research program or two.
Anyone who’s mixed up plant hormones knows 6-(γ,γ-Dimethylallylamino)purine, better called 2iP. Researchers use it to coax plant cells into dividing, a tool that groups like seed labs and commercial growers won’t go without. My first time working with PGRs, I realized that all these chemical names sound daunting, and with good reason—being careful with powders and liquids you barely know means taking safety seriously.
There’s not much fanfare about acute danger when it comes to 2iP. Large-scale data on its toxicity just doesn’t exist. No horror stories from the lab, as far as regulatory papers show. No record of 2iP being pumped into the “deadly” category the way cyanides or common pesticides have been. Still, it doesn’t deserve blind trust. The molecule isn’t as old or as widely tested as caffeine or aspirin, so there’s no green light for reckless handling. Just because a chemical seldom appears in accident reports doesn’t mean it’s totally harmless.
The closest relatives—other cytokinins—rarely trigger big toxic reactions. Small amounts tend to irritate before causing anything severe. A Safety Data Sheet (SDS) from credible chemical suppliers will always list mild skin and eye irritation as possible side effects. Without skin barrier protection, dryness or a rash isn’t out of the question, and splashing a solution in your eyes delivers a rough, stinging reminder to respect your bench. Swallowing is a wild card. Regulators don’t have a set lethal dose in animals, probably because the demand for mass toxicity data just isn’t there. That gap in knowledge encourages me to keep my food and drinks far from my workspace.
Every chemistry instructor I learned from insisted on gloves, lab coats, and goggles for a reason. Coating your skin in powder or feeling chemical fumes sting the nose once is usually lesson enough. The powders can billow and mix into air—avoid breathing dust by working in a well-ventilated hood. Simple steps, like taping down containers and labeling everything before you open, set up a safer routine. No matter how benign a record looks, chemicals deserve the same respect—nobody in my lab has regretted washing up twice or keeping a spill kit close.
Curiosity about plant growth runs up against patchy toxicology knowledge. Companies put out product info and SDS sheets, but the lack of government-mandated testing for every laboratory product leaves a hole. People deserve to know more than “this probably won’t hurt you.” More thorough studies would help everyone, from summer interns to seasoned greenhouse staff. I’ve seen even experienced hands get sloppy when they think they’re dealing with a “safe” chemical—knowledge and habits need to keep up with each new substance we handle. Until researchers fill the data gap, treating every unknown chemical as hazardous makes the most sense. PPE, ventilation and careful technique have never failed me or my colleagues. Sometimes, common sense backed by basic science works best, especially where certainty runs thin.
| Names | |
| Preferred IUPAC name | 6-[(3-Methylbut-2-en-1-yl)amino]purine |
| Other names |
N6-(Δ2-Isopentenyl)adenine N6-(2-Isopentenyl)adenine N6-(2-Isopentenyl)purine N6-(γ,γ-Dimethylallyl)adenine Isopentenyladenine 6-(γ,γ-Dimethylallylamino)purine |
| Pronunciation | /ˈsɪks ˈɡæm.ə ˈɡæm.ə daɪˈmɛθ.əlˌæl.i.əˌlaɪl.əˈmiː.noʊ ˈpjʊəˌriːn/ |
| Identifiers | |
| CAS Number | 13632-08-7 |
| Beilstein Reference | 173548 |
| ChEBI | CHEBI:27685 |
| ChEMBL | CHEMBL168789 |
| ChemSpider | 157351 |
| DrugBank | DB02170 |
| ECHA InfoCard | 100.252.815 |
| EC Number | 1.2.7.5 |
| Gmelin Reference | 81792 |
| KEGG | C11115 |
| MeSH | D03.438.221.173.320.150.437 |
| PubChem CID | 177539 |
| RTECS number | DJ1975000 |
| UNII | 1B6P7N9H4E |
| UN number | Not assigned |
| CompTox Dashboard (EPA) | DTXSID0059478 |
| Properties | |
| Chemical formula | C10H13N5 |
| Molar mass | 247.29 g/mol |
| Appearance | White solid |
| Odor | Odorless |
| Density | 1.2 g/cm³ |
| Solubility in water | soluble |
| log P | 0.67 |
| Acidity (pKa) | 5.17 |
| Basicity (pKb) | 4.28 |
| Magnetic susceptibility (χ) | -72.0e-6 cm³/mol |
| Dipole moment | 3.09 D |
| Thermochemistry | |
| Std molar entropy (S⦵298) | 205.6 J⋅mol⁻¹⋅K⁻¹ |
| Pharmacology | |
| ATC code | C01CA23 |
| Hazards | |
| Main hazards | May cause respiratory irritation. Causes serious eye irritation. Causes skin irritation. May cause an allergic skin reaction. |
| GHS labelling | GHS labelling: "Warning; H315, H319, H335; P261, P305+P351+P338 |
| Pictograms | SGH" |
| Signal word | Warning |
| Hazard statements | H302, H319 |
| Precautionary statements | P264, P270, P273, P280, P301+P312, P305+P351+P338, P337+P313, P501 |
| Flash point | Flash point: 230.5 °C |
| LD50 (median dose) | LD50 (median dose): 1400 mg/kg (oral, mice) |
| NIOSH | DJ1245000 |
| PEL (Permissible) | Not established |
| REL (Recommended) | 0.036 mg/L |
| Related compounds | |
| Related compounds |
Adenine 6-Benzylaminopurine 6-(γ,γ-Dimethylallylamino)purine riboside |
