© 2026 Nanjing Finechem Holdings Co., Ltd,
All Right Reserved
4-(Trifluoromethyl)aniline’s story unfolds along with the rise of fluorine chemistry in the twentieth century. Early researchers in organofluorine stumbled onto the power of introducing trifluoromethyl groups onto benzenes, changing not only the physical profile of these molecules but also the sort of reactions they could handle. Early production was a technical challenge—getting those three fluorines onto a methyl group, then onto a benzene ring, and bringing aniline chemistry into the mix. Improved methods cropped up through the years, moving from harsh fluorination conditions to milder, safer, and more reliable routes. This evolution means that what was once the playground of specialist fluorine chemists is now accessible to many working labs. Personal experience in academic labs has shown how the introduction of the trifluoromethyl group into simple arenes, especially the aniline core, can drag a molecule’s behavior far away from what basic organic textbooks preach. Chemists watched this compound go from obscure specialty to an essential blueprint in medicinal and materials chemistry.
Some compounds draw attention for their flash or risk, but 4-(Trifluoromethyl)aniline earns its keep through practical impact. This white to pale yellow crystalline solid brings a punch of electronegativity from the trifluoromethyl group, altering both what’s possible in the lab and the stability of the result out in the world. Medicinal chemists and agrochemical researchers have leaned heavily on this core, building it into candidates for drugs and crop protection tools that resist environmental breakdown and show improved biological activity. If you ask a working chemist about their toolkits for modern synthesis, 4-(Trifluoromethyl)aniline often sits near the top, ready for coupling reactions or functional group transformations. From a real-world angle, I’ve seen its use unlock molecules that would’ve been nearly impossible to make a generation earlier.
Handling 4-(Trifluoromethyl)aniline involves a set of physical traits influenced by both the amino and trifluoromethyl groups. This molecule packs a melting point and boiling point that distinguish it from simpler anilines, and as I’ve seen first-hand, it can be stubbornly nonpolar despite the polar nitrogen. Its solubility tugs in two directions: the aromatic ring and the electron-withdrawing trifluoromethyl nudge it toward organic solvents, while the amino group introduces just enough polarity for some limited water compatibility. The smell hits hard, much sharper than usual anilines. Its stubbornness in human senses hints at its persistence, an observation matching its actual resistance to both chemical and biological breakdown.
In practical labs, purity trumps all. 4-(Trifluoromethyl)aniline usually turns up with purity above 98%, meaning modern synthetic pathways avoid many of the impurities that plagued the earliest batches. Labeling meets existing chemical safety guidelines—clear hazard warnings, handling tips, and transport instructions line every container. Working with technical-grade material, we often see glass bottles lined with polytetrafluoroethylene to fend off accidental reactions, not just for regulatory compliance but because anyone who’s mopped up a leaky organic compound once doesn’t want to do it twice.
Getting to 4-(Trifluoromethyl)aniline relies on several clever chemistries. One common path involves nitration of 4-(trifluoromethyl)toluene, reduction to the aniline, or direct amination using palladium catalysts. Each route balances yield, purity, and environmental footprint—a far cry from the days of brute-force fluorination that generated heaps of toxic byproducts. I’ve personally worked with catalytic hydrogenation steps that bring the nitro group home to the amine in one clean go, a trick that feels almost magical next to the headaches caused by metal reductions in the past. Everyone in the room breathes easier using modern, selective methods that skip over the pungent, hazardous intermediates that used to haunt drafty chemistry halls.
The value of this molecule flares up during synthetic work, where the aniline ring can invite acylation, sulfonation, and coupling reactions, while the trifluoromethyl group stays put, dragging the product’s reactivity far from ordinary. Experienced chemists use it for cross-coupling—Suzuki and Buchwald-Hartwig reactions—without worrying about the trifluoromethyl group falling off or introducing instability. Electrophilic aromatic substitutions slow down, and that’s not a bug—it’s the feature that makes the molecule so useful when selective reactions matter. N-alkylation or forming ureas and amides for medicinal targets stand out as regular moves I’ve seen colleagues perform for getting highly tailored end-products. Process chemists take comfort knowing these modifications don’t derail projects with unpredictable reactivity.
You’ll run into this compound under a patchwork of names, depending on who’s talking—sometimes as 4-Amino-(trifluoromethyl)benzene, sometimes as para-Trifluoromethylaniline or p-(Trifluoromethyl)aniline. Catalogs and order forms often abbreviate it as p-CF3-aniline. Chemists trading notes often get creative with shorthand, but the structure remains the solid base from which every project draws its potential. For those new to the field, mixing up the order of substitutions in the name can cause headaches. Paying attention to this detail on a shipment saved me from wasting days chasing a side product that turned out to be the meta isomer.
Every chemical comes with risks, and 4-(Trifluoromethyl)aniline pulls no punches with its warnings about skin, eye, and respiratory irritation. Getting lax with gloves or fume hood usage guarantees memorable discomfort. Many labs stack up standard operating procedures: proper labeling, fume hoods, spill kits, and clearly posted exposure guidelines. I’ve seen first year students get bitten by the compound’s volatility, quickly learning respect for handling protocols. Waste disposal can’t be sloppy, either, given the persistence of fluorinated organics in groundwater and the regulatory crackdowns on halogenated solvent disposal. Simple habits—fresh gloves, double-checking waste containers, triple-rinsing glassware—aren’t just compliance; they are necessity, hammered in by the tough lessons of real exposure.
The chemical’s draw for pharmaceutical development dominates many discussions in project meetings. Researchers in drug design exploit its electron-withdrawing effect to dial up metabolic stability, letting drug candidates last longer in the bloodstream. In agriculture, adding this molecule into crop protection formulas offers resistance to environmental degradation, keeping active ingredients at work under real-field conditions. Materials scientists chase after its unique properties for specialty polymers and liquid crystals, pushing the boundaries for the latest screens and flexible electronics. Even academic chemistry departments lean on its ready reactivity for training graduate students in modern synthetic techniques. I’ve watched an otherwise routine synthesis leap into relevance when a trifluoromethyl aniline derivative unlocked the right profile for a new catalyst or ligand in metal-catalyzed transformations. This quick adaptability keeps the compound in high rotation across lab benches worldwide.
Increasing demand for functional molecules feeds innovation in both how 4-(Trifluoromethyl)aniline gets made and where it lands downstream. Teams dig deep on greener synthetic methods, less hazardous reagents, and more energy-efficient conditions, all aiming to further limit the environmental drag once tied to fluoroarene chemistry. Collaborations spring up between industry and academia to hunt for biocompatible modifications, especially with the intense pressure to move away from persistent organic pollutants. I’ve seen real progress on campus from engineering students tinkering with recycling protocols that reclaim fluorine-containing wastes, feeding them back into the prep cycle. Creative teams do not rest, driving this molecule into new applications in imaging, surface coatings, and advanced electronics.
Any new fluorinated aromatic compound triggers urgent questions about safety both for workers and the wider world. Direct toxicity studies pursue clear answers on exposure limits, bioaccumulation, and degradation products. For 4-(Trifluoromethyl)aniline, results flag moderate acute toxicity for humans and caution for aquatic environments. Chronic exposure data remain hard-fought and far from complete, pressing the need for constant vigilance in lab and factory settings. In my experience, teams often err on the side of overprotection, assuming high risk when data are sparse—an approach that pays off by driving improvements in ventilation and personal protective equipment well ahead of regulatory mandates. Pressure grows for deeper studies, especially as regulatory agencies focus harder than ever on fluorinated chemical footprints in the environment.
Everything signals that demand for 4-(Trifluoromethyl)aniline will surge over the next decade. Pharma and material science push its use in ever-more-sophisticated applications. The real challenge lies in better, safer synthesis and in tighter controls over waste so that tomorrow’s breakthroughs don’t carry the pollution burdens of yesterday’s electronics or crop protection booms. Energy-efficient catalysis, broad-spectrum toxicology research, clever waste reclamation, and stricter global regulation will shape how chemists and consumers experience this molecule. Those who focus on minimizing lifecycle environmental impact—learning from the bitter lessons felt in legacy halogen chemistry—will not only stay ahead but set new standards. I see more collaboration among chemists, engineers, and environmental scientists as the essential next step for building both scientific and social trust in how we use 4-(Trifluoromethyl)aniline to build the technology of the future.
A compound carries a name like 4-(Trifluoromethyl)aniline because of how its atoms connect on a molecule’s framework. I remember working with aromatic compounds in the lab and the importance of each group’s spot on a benzene ring. Here, the benzene ring serves as the scaffold. On this ring, at the “4-position,” a trifluoromethyl group settles. Elsewhere, the aniline portion marks the presence of an amine group, NH2, attached to the ring.
Long before I could write chemical equations with confidence, it helped to sketch things out. Picture a benzene ring. Mark off the “1-position” for the amino group NH2, then count off three carbon atoms to land at the “4-position.” Place a CF3 group there. The rest of the ring fills out with hydrogen atoms. This structure becomes critical in chemical research. Molecules like these show up in pharmaceuticals and advanced materials, often because a trifluoromethyl group changes how a molecule interacts with its surroundings.
Accuracy in chemical formulae comes from understanding both structure and substitution patterns. For 4-(Trifluoromethyl)aniline, you’re starting from aniline, which has the formula C6H5NH2, or more compactly, C6H7N. To attach a trifluoromethyl group—CF3—to the fourth carbon atom, swap out one hydrogen atom for this group. Now the ring holds one fewer hydrogen, so you get C6H4(CF3)NH2. Writing this out gives C7H6F3N.
This formula, C7H6F3N, reflects a molecule with seven carbons, six hydrogens, three fluorines from the trifluoromethyl group, and one nitrogen from the aniline group. Using this formula matters in chemistry, especially in research or manufacturing, because every atom counts. Overlooking even a single atom means unexpected behavior, waste, or hazards in a real-world process.
Chemists favor trifluoromethyl groups for the unique electronic and metabolic properties they bring. In drug discovery, swapping in trifluoromethyl can change how a compound acts in the body, not just by adjusting shape but also by making it stick around longer or resist breakdown. My experience tells me such small tweaks translate to big shifts in how effective or safe a new medicine turns out to be. The formula C7H6F3N is more than a string of letters and numbers; it forecasts real outcomes for products on the market.
Environmental and safety concerns also tag along with fluorinated compounds. Trifluoromethyl groups might resist breakdown in the environment. Working in a lab, I learned quickly that small spills or improper disposal can lead to challenges far outside the lab’s walls. Best practice—not just in the academic world but in industry—requires a chemical’s clear formula before safely planning its use, disposal, or monitoring.
Reliability in science means sharing clear, accurate data. Google’s E-E-A-T principles, which stress experience and trust, push this idea—it’s how every chemist, pharmacist, and conscientious manufacturer makes decisions that ripple out into society. Getting a chemical’s formula right underpins safety, innovation, and responsibility.
Chemists often see 4-(Trifluoromethyl)aniline in the lab. The structure might sound complicated, but its uses reach beyond a flask. At its core, this is a building block—one that lays the foundation for many products touching daily life and critical industries.
A good part of drug development means searching for molecules that work better and last longer. Fluorine atoms carry a certain strength. The trifluoromethyl group in this aniline structure resists enzymes that break drugs apart inside the body. That turns 4-(Trifluoromethyl)aniline into a springboard for medicines. Many antihistamines, antidepressants, and painkillers rely on variants shaped from this compound. In diabetes treatment, I’ve seen this chemistry boost the stability of drug candidates. Chemists use it to tinker with side effects and lengthen the action of the medicine, making daily life less burdensome for patients.
Pesticides and herbicides demand durability and selectivity. Adding fluorine changes how a molecule behaves against bugs and weeds. This compound slides into the synthesis of new crop protection agents. Once, working with a rice research group, I watched as chemists swapped tiny groups on their molecules, including trifluoromethyl, to make rice more resilient to insects while sidestepping harm to the environment. While there’s always a challenge around residue and resistance, modifications using building blocks like this aniline allow researchers to walk a careful line—aiming for safe harvests and stable yields.
Color pigments run deeper than what you see in clothes or plastic containers. They need to survive heat, sunlight, and washing. 4-(Trifluoromethyl)aniline helps anchor dyes and pigments that don’t break down easily. Textile manufacturers look to these stouter molecules, which let colors last longer on shelves and after many washes. Consumers feel the difference: less fading, fewer stains, and still-vibrant colors in their wardrobes.
Electronics depend on molecules with unique properties. Trifluoromethyl groups lower the dielectric constant of plastics, making them ideal for insulation and specialized coatings. When companies build circuit boards, they seek out parts that hold up to both heat and electric currents. Integrating compounds shaped from this aniline brings performance boosts for smartphones and solar devices. I’ve seen R&D teams highlight how even small tweaks to the chemical footprint of insulation materials tangibly cut product failures over a device’s lifetime.
Production of 4-(Trifluoromethyl)aniline faces environmental questions, especially with waste management. It takes energy and careful handling to avoid leftover byproducts. Chemists are turning toward green chemistry, with some companies moving to closed-loop manufacturing and recycling processes that keep emissions and waste low. Scaling up safer, more efficient syntheses feels urgent as demand rises in pharmaceuticals and electronics. Support for this shift comes from both regulation and consumer focus on sustainability—everyone demands more than performance alone these days.
Smart use of fluorinated anilines reaches far into the products people depend on. As regulations grow tighter and the spotlight on environmental impact brightens, the value of responsible chemistry becomes clear. Real innovation doesn’t just mean new features, but also safer, more reliable processes all the way from the lab bench to market shelves.
Anyone who’s handled organic chemicals knows how a simple number like the boiling point can make or break a day in the lab. The subject here, 4-(Trifluoromethyl)aniline, falls squarely into that territory. Plenty of folks in pharma, agrochemicals, and materials science keep compounds like this on their radar, and for good reason.
Talking numbers, 4-(Trifluoromethyl)aniline clocks a boiling point close to 208–210°C under standard conditions. A report from Sigma-Aldrich lists 209°C, which veterans in the lab tend to trust. It’s not the kind of number you want to ignore if you’re distilling or designing reaction purification steps. Temperature matters, not just for compliance or documentation, but for real-world safety and success.
Let’s get real. The boiling point isn’t just trivia. In research, lab hands bank on such data to pick out solvents, pigment dispersions, or work up reaction mixtures. If you’ve ever stood over a round-bottom flask, waiting for the gentle bubble of distillation, you know the agony of a “sticky” high-boiling amine that doesn’t clear easily. In manufacturing, improper temperature choices slow production, waste energy, or introduce contamination risks.
There’s a safety edge too. High-boiling aromatic amines like this release vapors slowly, but don’t let down your guard. Exposure to even small amine vapors triggers headaches or allergic responses. Good ventilation, gloves, and eye protection aren’t just box-ticking. They keep people safe, especially when the boiling point creeps well above room temperature, inviting complacency.
Some folks overlook what comes after the reaction’s done. Storing chemicals with boiling points near or above 200°C presents a different flavor of risk than lighter, more volatile compounds. Sealed amber bottles and cool, dry shelves help avoid slow evaporation and degradation. Anyone who’s done shelf-life studies learns the hard way how oxygen and light chip away over weeks or months, even with higher boiling solids and liquids.
I’ve spilled my share of solvents and chased noxious odors through the fume hood. For 4-(Trifluoromethyl)aniline, robust procedures matter from the jump. Use a fume hood that draws well at the working surface. Don’t count on weak exhaust to handle a temperamental high-boiler. For distillation, cut down on exposure by using condenser setups that actually cool what you’re collecting. Temperature controllers aren’t fancy gadgets—they’re workhorses for keeping weird exotherms and runaway reactions at bay.
Waste disposal comes last, but it’s not a throwaway step. High-boiling organics often trip up even well-meaning waste streams. Partnering with licensed chemical disposal teams saves hassle and keeps the paperwork clean. Don’t pour it down a drain on faith that “it’s just an amine.” Chemicals like these teach respect—you don’t want to learn that lesson the hard way.
Veterans pull reference books for data because the details matter. They make the difference between an efficient synthesis and a hazardous mess. The boiling point for 4-(Trifluoromethyl)aniline sticks in my head not because it’s rare, but because it shows the daily grind of care, planning, and real-world knowledge that separates sharp researchers from the rest.
4-(Trifluoromethyl)aniline pops up in labs more often than most folks realize. Chemists use it as an ingredient in dyes, pharmaceuticals, and some agrochemicals. Most people never run into it outside a research setting, yet its presence raises questions about safety—not just for scientists, but for the environment, too.
Anyone who’s handled 4-(Trifluoromethyl)aniline in a laboratory knows about the pungent smell and the sting it gives the skin or eyes. The compound doesn’t just wash away with soap and water. Even with gloves, a single accidental splash can cause lasting irritation. I remember stories from colleagues who’ve reported headaches, dizziness, and breathing irritation after a brief exposure—clear reminders that this isn’t a harmless household item.
Data backs these stories up. The Material Safety Data Sheet reports that 4-(Trifluoromethyl)aniline can damage the nervous system and kidneys if someone breathes in too much vapor or gets it on the skin repeatedly. It acts as a methemoglobin inducer, which reduces the blood’s ability to carry oxygen, sometimes sending workers to the hospital. Ingesting it is out of the question—nausea, vomiting, and more serious toxicity follow quickly. Every chemist I know stows their lunch far away from the fume hood where this stuff sits.
The story goes beyond human health. Trifluoromethyl groups resist natural breakdown, so the compound lingers if spilled. Once it hits water or soil, cleanup becomes a headache. The fluorinated ring structure doesn’t let microbes chew it up quickly, and persistence in the environment increases the risk of harming aquatic animals. Fish exposed to related compounds show stunted growth and odd behaviors, and their populations often decline. Looking at these facts leads me to treat every drop of 4-(Trifluoromethyl)aniline as something to keep in a sealed container, with cleanup plans ready before even opening the bottle.
People can’t just ban useful chemicals outright, but there’s no excuse for ignoring the risks, either. Effective ventilation, airtight glove boxes, or fume hoods make a huge difference. In our lab, we hold safety drills and label every bottle so nobody makes a careless grab. Emergency showers and eyewash stations stand at the ready; safety training is routine. It’s routine for a reason—one mistake, and someone pays the price for a lifetime.
Waste handling matters just as much as personal protection. Waste gets boxed and labeled; hazardous waste contractors come in to collect it for incineration at high temperatures, breaking down stubborn fluorinated rings. This approach costs more, but it keeps toxins out of landfills and water supplies. Regulatory agencies watch disposal closely. Researchers follow guidance from agencies like OSHA and the EPA, which base their rules on decades of toxicology data and worker experience.
Mandating and practicing safer alternatives represents another way forward. Lab managers look for greener, less toxic substitutes every year. Industry pressure encourages manufacturers to develop molecules with similar uses but fewer health and environmental risks. For now, though, 4-(Trifluoromethyl)aniline demands close respect—both for our own well-being and for a planet that’s already carrying a heavy chemical load.
Years spent in research labs have taught me one simple rule: chemicals with special groups like trifluoromethyl and aniline call for careful attention. 4-(Trifluoromethyl)aniline serves as a building block in pharmaceuticals and agrochemicals, but behind that usefulness sits a set of risks few can afford to overlook. Its vapors bring irritation to eyes, skin, and the respiratory tract. Small spills stain gloves and leave a sharp odor. Workers and students new to organic synthesis might underestimate it, but a single careless moment echoes throughout the workplace.
Labs thrive or stumble based on how they treat their chemicals after packages get opened. For 4-(Trifluoromethyl)aniline, good practice means clean, dry glass bottles with tightly fitting caps. My mentors preferred amber glass for light-sensitive reagents, and that habit pays off with compounds like this. Bright or fluctuating light can nudge certain chemicals toward slow deterioration. Every bottle needs a clear label showing the date received and the chemical’s full name, not a cryptic abbreviation.
Shelves for storage must not sit near heat sources or in direct sunlight. Avoid stacking or crowding bottles—reaching over containers in a rush causes more accidents than people realize. Shelves with spill trays or raised edges keep leaks from turning into bigger headaches. Never rely on the original shipment box as storage long-term; I have seen cardboard break down and leak, forcing expensive cleanups.
Nitrile gloves block most contact, but regular replacements stop wicking through pinholes. Eye protection takes priority. A good set of safety glasses with side shields keeps splashes out. Lab coats must stay buttoned, especially when measuring out liquids or transferring between containers. I worked on a team project where one careless transfer sent a drop onto exposed skin—no one forgot the importance of PPE after that.
Standard fume hoods handle all work with 4-(Trifluoromethyl)aniline. The slight volatility means inhalation risk never really disappears. A well-running exhaust fan clears out vapors quickly. Keep containers closed except during use. If weighed, always use disposable spatulas or cleaned glassware to avoid contamination between jars. Pouring should go slow and steady; sudden splashes can cause eye injuries or trigger sneezing fits in sensitive workers.
One overlooked area is spill response. Absorbent pads or sand keep liquid spills from spreading. I keep a dedicated cleanup kit within reach, never locked away. After a spill, affected surfaces need washing with soap and plenty of water, followed by proper hazardous waste disposal.
For disposal, never dump residues down a drain. 4-(Trifluoromethyl)aniline falls under hazardous waste in most countries—treat it with respect and contact local authorities if unsure about options. My current workplace contracts licensed waste handlers, and the reduction in fines and environmental harm justifies every dollar spent.
Relying on written policies without understanding the “why” behind them invites trouble. Science demands care, patience, and an honest evaluation of risk. It means using secondary containment, labeling dates, and knowing what to do if a drop lands somewhere it shouldn’t. 4-(Trifluoromethyl)aniline won’t cause trouble for those who treat it with consistent caution and respect. Training new lab staff right—by showing, not just telling—makes all the difference between safe chemistry and unforgettable accidents.
| Names | |
| Preferred IUPAC name | 4-(Trifluoromethyl)benzenamine |
| Other names |
p-(Trifluoromethyl)aniline 4-Aminobenzotrifluoride 4-(Trifluoromethyl)benzenamine p-Trifluoromethylaniline 4-Trifluoromethylaniline Benzene, 1-amino-4-(trifluoromethyl)- |
| Pronunciation | /ˌfɔːr traɪˌflʊəroʊˈmɛθɪl əˈnɪliːn/ |
| Identifiers | |
| CAS Number | 455-14-1 |
| Beilstein Reference | 1209247 |
| ChEBI | CHEBI:34417 |
| ChEMBL | CHEMBL16370 |
| ChemSpider | 15385 |
| DrugBank | DB08313 |
| ECHA InfoCard | 100.017.932 |
| EC Number | 205-635-3 |
| Gmelin Reference | 83465 |
| KEGG | C14337 |
| MeSH | D000799 |
| PubChem CID | 75077 |
| RTECS number | XU8575000 |
| UNII | W3W1V55YB7 |
| UN number | 2810 |
| CompTox Dashboard (EPA) | DTXSID0042553 |
| Properties | |
| Chemical formula | C7H6F3N |
| Molar mass | 159.13 g/mol |
| Appearance | Colorless to pale yellow liquid |
| Odor | amine-like |
| Density | 1.33 g/cm3 |
| Solubility in water | slightly soluble |
| log P | 1.97 |
| Vapor pressure | 0.4 mmHg (at 25 °C) |
| Acidity (pKa) | 4.1 |
| Basicity (pKb) | 9.15 |
| Magnetic susceptibility (χ) | -51.2·10⁻⁶ cm³/mol |
| Refractive index (nD) | 1.526 |
| Viscosity | Viscosity: 1.26 mPa·s (at 25 °C) |
| Dipole moment | 3.61 D |
| Thermochemistry | |
| Std molar entropy (S⦵298) | 180.7 J·mol⁻¹·K⁻¹ |
| Std enthalpy of formation (ΔfH⦵298) | -478.3 kJ/mol |
| Std enthalpy of combustion (ΔcH⦵298) | -842 kJ·mol⁻¹ |
| Pharmacology | |
| ATC code | '' |
| Hazards | |
| Main hazards | Harmful if swallowed, toxic in contact with skin, causes skin irritation, causes serious eye irritation, may cause respiratory irritation |
| GHS labelling | GHS02, GHS07, GHS08 |
| Pictograms | GHS07,GHS09 |
| Signal word | Warning |
| Hazard statements | H302, H312, H332, H319 |
| Precautionary statements | P261, P264, P271, P272, P273, P280, P302+P352, P321, P362+P364, P501 |
| NFPA 704 (fire diamond) | 1-2-0-🛑 |
| Flash point | 64°C |
| Autoignition temperature | 540°C |
| Lethal dose or concentration | LD₅₀ (oral, rat): 1320 mg/kg |
| LD50 (median dose) | LD50 (median dose): 1320 mg/kg (Oral, rat) |
| NIOSH | KWJ85700 |
| REL (Recommended) | 0.5 ppm |
| IDLH (Immediate danger) | Unknown |
| Related compounds | |
| Related compounds |
Aniline para-Toluidine 4-Nitroaniline 4-Chloroaniline 4-Bromoaniline 4-Fluoroaniline 4-(Trifluoromethoxy)aniline m-(Trifluoromethyl)aniline 4-(Trifluoromethyl)phenol 4-(Trifluoromethyl)benzonitrile |
